SusieBlue wrote: » The amount of imbeciles I'm seeing posting to facebook groups on both sides of the campaign asking if their vote still counts if they did a tick or put a circle around Yes. How hard is it to write an X?!? So many spoiled votes from people not following directions properly.
revelman wrote: » If something is more polarising, it can have the opposite effect: some people will feel like staying at home. I'm not saying your wrong but it will be interesting to see if men vote in the same numbers as women. If the voting holds up after 5pm this evening, then I think we are in for a higher turnout than SSM. (By the way, even though I'm old, I'm not implying that men are at work and women are at home. I'm simply relaying the fact that statistically-speaking there are more stay-at-home parents who are women who may have already voted).
Working class heroes wrote: » I’m on the No side myself. However I gave my vote to my 16 year old daughter and she is on the yes side, just about. Not entirely legal I know but I reasoned it’s a lot more relevant to her than me.
juanjo wrote: » My GF's parents and her uncle, all late 60's early 70's, and 2 of them churchgoers, have voted yes. I guess that life experiences and ability to walk on someone else's shoes count a good deal as well.
Rossie11 wrote: » No Wife voted yes as did few of her friends all of who's husbands all voted No 30-40s age group
_Dara_ wrote: » Well, the phrase refers to the two poles as in people strongly feeling one way or another. Those are not the kind of people who are ditherers.
revelman wrote: » Yes, but that does not mean that all 3.3 million voters are at one pole or the other!
Working class heroes wrote: » Once there is a clear indication of the voters intent it will be counted.
BarryD2 wrote: » As far as I know, a clear mark is required? Once it's in the box and not crossing both boxes or outside a box. O, X or tick - what's the difference. Who signs their signature with an X these days?
pumpkin4life wrote: » Voted no. On a sidenote, no one talking about Varadker taking funds from big pharma abortion pill manufacturing companies no?
SusieBlue wrote: » Apparently one of the women went back and asked after she realised her mistake and she was told it would be considered spoiled and not counted, this was from the person overseeing the station. I hope they're wrong though and they're counted!!
seamus wrote: » No, people tend not to talk about things that didn't happen.
lilsparkle69 wrote: » I voted Yes! Such a good feeling
pgj2015 wrote: » yeah, I love babies being killed as well.
revelman wrote: » If you want to ensure a No vote you should think about this rationally. There may be a chance that undecided voters are reading this thread given that it is currently trending on Boards.ie Do you think that this is the best way to persuade them to vote No? I think the official No campaign turned a lot of undecided away from them over the past week.
august12 wrote: » selassie wrote: If you put a tick instead of an X is your vote not counted? Not counted
selassie wrote: If you put a tick instead of an X is your vote not counted?
seamus wrote: » pumpkin4life wrote: » Voted no. On a sidenote, no one talking about Varadker taking funds from big pharma abortion pill manufacturing companies no? No, people tend not to talk about things that didn't happen.
