Katgurl wrote: » Yes a few years ago. A terrible experience. I would not recommend. Tinder (or equivalent) and real-life stuff like clubs etc are a way better bet. I know they are time-consuming and frustrating but think about it; it is very rare to meet someone you connect with. How likely is it that they will be on the books of your matchmaker? I met my guy on tinder a couple of years later. I had to date a lit of frogs first though unfortunately.
ronaldol wrote: » Thanks guys for your replies....finding it really tough to meet people. I'm on tinder & pof for over a year & haven't even had a date
Mags2018 wrote: » This is what drives girls like myself to these so called matchmakers who take complete advantage of the situation Going out for a drink is lovely if it was just that. But 4/5 pubs later and it just begins to feel like actual work - all I want is to be at home curled up under my bed covers. The pub scene takes a lot of energy, between blaring music, being pushed and shoved and don't even get me started on trying to order a drink at the bar...it's not my cup of tea but I do it as what's the alternative?...Saturday night with Miriam...No thanks I have tried the whole taking evening classes, joining a gym, volunteering, online dating and it's just never led me to anything in terms of meeting fellas It was so much easier in my college days and early on in my working career whereby you're part of a big institution and can 'spot' other guys on a regular basis. Not just a quick glance in a bar whilst passing by each other and then never to be seen again. Now I just focus being in the present as I've spent way too long worrying about how, where, when, who - whatever will be will be
Mags2018 wrote: » With the pub scene I get chatted up and a number of times have been asked for my number but no follow through...then of course with some I just wouldn't be giving my number to them As for online dating I dabbled with it but probably gave up too soon. But again it suits some people and works for them but not for others
swaner wrote: » Exactly, I was involved in such thing, because of a friend of mine, so sharing your experience. Hookup sites (http://onenightstand1.com/sex-hookup-sites) and apps like Tinder, Bumble, Down, Pure, etc can do a much better job and most of them is free to use... Or simple examining social circles of your friends on FaceBook can do sometimes a job...
erudec wrote: » The problem there is that Tinder filters out all the people who don't photograph well, or just don't know how to take a good picture. Lots of men look a lot better in person than on a phone screen. By depending on Tinder instead of real life, you're also going up against harder competition. If you meet a person in real life, you can let your personality and body language help you. But on Tinder, he may get another match with a boring, stupid cold-hearted girl who just looks amazing on a phone screen. I'd bet huge money that couples who met on Tinder will have vastly more divorces than couples who met face-to-face. Does anyone think the opposite? In short, join whatever agency or website that helps you see people for the first time in real life, face to face. Use Tinder for casual, first-date sex, if that is what you enjoy, because that's what it is for. It's a gay men's casual sex app for people with the desire for immediate, anonymous, relationship-free sex. That's not me, and I don't think it's for many women on boards.ie. For a few nymphomaniacs, it is perfect, but those girls know how to pick men up in real life too. And the men who do well on Tinder are very eager to meet the nymphos. Nymphos are much more likely to be able to do all the complicated tricks that porn actresses do. I would need years of yoga and fitness training to do that stuff, even if I was so inclined. I'm saying: social media is only good as an introduction. If you actually want to select a guy without meeting him first, you have to accept that the chances of it going badly are much higher.
ginandtonicsky wrote: » Guys want speed on dating sites, whereas women want comfort. The two things don't align. Feeling like you're just a number and you've received a cut-and-copy message or an uninventive "hi how are you" is about as romantic as a hole in the head.
Mags2018 wrote: » I once got talking to a really lovely guy in a pub in Dublin few years back by pure accident it was very busy and packed and as I was passing him I asked if he knew where the loos were located. But as it happened he was in the same boat and we just hit it off. Both up from the country for the night and it just seemed to have a good flow to it. Unfortunately I was then duped by a friend of mine at the time who I brought into the conversation but who then decided to ask him straight out which one of us was he interested in (when I did eventually get to go the bathroom) So I came back to a very different scenario. Anyways my point is I have stepped up and made first move but probably in a subtle way but not in last year.
Katgurl wrote: » erudec wrote: » The problem there is that Tinder filters out all the people who don't photograph well, or just don't know how to take a good picture. Lots of men look a lot better in person than on a phone screen. By depending on Tinder instead of real life, you're also going up against harder competition. If you meet a person in real life, you can let your personality and body language help you. But on Tinder, he may get another match with a boring, stupid cold-hearted girl who just looks amazing on a phone screen. I'd bet huge money that couples who met on Tinder will have vastly more divorces than couples who met face-to-face. Does anyone think the opposite? In short, join whatever agency or website that helps you see people for the first time in real life, face to face. Use Tinder for casual, first-date sex, if that is what you enjoy, because that's what it is for. It's a gay men's casual sex app for people with the desire for immediate, anonymous, relationship-free sex. That's not me, and I don't think it's for many women on boards.ie. For a few nymphomaniacs, it is perfect, but those girls know how to pick men up in real life too. And the men who do well on Tinder are very eager to meet the nymphos. Nymphos are much more likely to be able to do all the complicated tricks that porn actresses do. I would need years of yoga and fitness training to do that stuff, even if I was so inclined. I'm saying: social media is only good as an introduction. If you actually want to select a guy without meeting him first, you have to accept that the chances of it going badly are much higher. I don't agree with this. Tinder doesn't have to replace real life. The two aren't mutually exclusive. I wasn't interested in hookups so i made that clear. I met guys IRL but just happened to meet my boyfriend on tinder. (Granted, he had a few casual encounters on it before me.) When using tinder i was quite open-minded about the pics but ruthless about the messaging. If they didnt catch my attention / tried to make the conversation sexual early on in used the unmatch function. It's better to get a date organised quite quickly I'm if he looks and sounds interesting. No need to go sharing all your personal info or innermost thoughts, just see do you have rapport.
TeaBagMania wrote: » Maybe Ireland is different in that respect. My experience has been just the opposite. Almost everyone is up for a short chat between set's, however, there are a few diehard focused people that just don't want to have a conversation but they are ulta rare. I think "stalking ground" is a bit extreme, just be yourself and you'll find many friends
Mags2018 wrote: » Calling all single ladies in the ladies lounge we need to come up with a plan for uniting people wanting the same thing !!!!?? Forget your speed dating and matchmaking agencies - something else must be waiting to be explored - shouldn't be this hard Anyone into events planning !!?? ;-)
Emme wrote: » In my experience most singles events turn out to be 80% female no matter how much effort is put into getting men to attend.
Emme wrote: » and didn't frighten the horses, so to speak
TeaBagMania wrote: » sounds just like the kind of event im looking for how do I go about finding them?
Emme wrote: » he would have no need to fork out the guts of a grand to join a dating agency. That is why women have such dire experiences with dating agencies. The men just aren't there.
Emme wrote: » A single man of a certain age is always in demand.
Emme wrote: » . The men just aren't there.