John.G wrote: » This is fascinating information and does cast some doubt over the T90 SR, my friend has been reading these posts as well and is getting cold feet (no pun intended). I,m amazed he didnt check the heating can resistance(s) etc, don't know if it contravenes safety rules but I wonder did he check the voltage at the shower terminals while it was running on full load, one would think that the service engineer would have some type of wiring harness made up so that he could safely monitor this. Even with 226V average and allowing for a cable voltage drop of 3V then the 9.0 KW shower should still have been producing almost 8.5 KW and anyhow your old shower would/should have been running under the same conditions (same cabling). If Triton offered to get that unit replaced with another T90 SR, including free installation, would you consider it?
Wearb wrote: » What size is shower cable? What is the length of the run? Is it exposed or covered? Is anything else taken off it?
Sleeper12 wrote: » If it was an issue with the shower then the only part it could be is the element. I'm baffled as to why he didn't at least try a different element. You'd know once & for all. Your electrician friend was spot on about calibration. Usually in shower repair calibration isn't that important. We want to see around 230 volts. Most of the other tests aren't voltage and can be done with the power off. If it's not the voltage coming into the house then it has to be a faulty element. I wonder is it possible that a 7.5kw element fell into the wrong pile in the factory in the UK. They all look the same. Black body & copper top. No markings to know what kW it is.
John.G wrote: » Triton would want to get their act together or people will be going back to the "bad" old Mira!
Wearb wrote: » Pity there wasn't more extensive testing on it, but I suppose if the engineer got 216V on his first test, he just more or less gave up. Anybody else following this thread with the SR that could do some simple tests for us for comparison?
John.G wrote: » How many people I wonder are running with faulty showers because of that multimeter because any house that would read 230V on it would need a actual voltage of 241V. As you say it would be great if some users of this model did a few simple tests.
Sleeper12 wrote: » Just put the multi meter on my own Triton T90SR. Meter has never been calibrated but its less than a year old. Good quality fluke. Voltage with shower off 236 volts & running the shower flat out it dropped to 226 volt but it functioned perfectly at that rate. Shower is downstairs. Cable run is 4 to 5 metres. 10mm cable to a 40 amp rcbo
John.G wrote: » What about that jug test?, as your shower is obviously A1 then it would be interesting to see its flowrate now. I would expect around 3.6 to 3.9 LPM.
Wearb wrote: Do you measure the voltage at meter box AND close to shower? I am interested to know if any of that voltage drop was due to you ESB supply or tails.
Wearb wrote: We have to get him into the attic as well John There'll be no sleep for sleeper now
Sleeper12 wrote: » 236 at the meter & dropped to 230 with the shower on full. Resistance on the elements are 13 and 11
Sleeper12 wrote: » I'm not taking the ladder out of the van. Its a Saturday night ffs.
John.G wrote: What about that jug test?, as your shower is obviously A1 then it would be interesting to see its flowrate now. I would expect around 3.6 to 3.9 LPM.
Sleeper12 wrote: » Didn't put a thermometer on it but had it hot enough for a very hot shower its running around 3.3 litres per minute
John.G wrote: I think all this is very conclusive proof that this shower can produce the goods and Triton have just made another sale to my friend.
John.G wrote: » That sounds spot on, gives a showering temp of around 45/46C. I think all this is very conclusive proof that this shower can produce the goods and Triton have just made another sale to my friend.
Sleeper12 wrote: » It's a pity the engineer didn't replace Damoedges element. They are loosing what sounds like a lifelong customer by lazy diagnostics
Damoedge wrote: I hate saying this....Your lucky is hot enough to have a shower in that's great...but....what is the water pressure like at that setting?
Damoedge wrote: » I hate saying this....Your lucky is hot enough to have a shower in that's great...but....what is the water pressure like at that setting?
Sleeper12 wrote: » It was 3.3 litres per minute
Damoedge wrote: I take it that 1.9 liters is bad sure I know it is!
Sleeper12 wrote: » Sounds like you are operating on just one element. Will you try one more test. Turn it on & get the water to the temperature that you would shower in. Then turn the top dial from two elements to one element. Dial will now be at 12 o clock. Does the temperature of the water drop off?