ted1 wrote: » These guys had a consensual threesome. Al Porter Sexually molested a co worker, where are the ads asking RTE, Today FM, TV 3 etc not to allow him back?
"Any sluts get fucked?" "We are all top shaggers" "There was a bit of spit roasting going on last night" "There was a lot of spit roast last night" "Last night was hilarious" "Walked upstairs and there were more flutes than the 12th of July" "Did you pass spit roast brassers" "Why are we all such legends" "Pumped a girl with Jacko on Monday. Roasted her. Then another on Tuesday"
cloudatlas wrote: » They weren't drunk it was in the morning they were sober.
almostover wrote: » The only mobs I ever remember hearing about were those who wore point white masks and rounded up young black men who the accused of defiling their young daughters.
jm08 wrote: » No, I don't care if his career is ended. I think it would be good for Ulster and the 2 lads if they left. The best thing for Ulster imo is a big clear out and a fresh start.
erica74 wrote: » Can I just ask the posters defending the group chat and texts as essentially a once off or a snapshot or whatever, do you honestly think that that one night and the following morning (or whatever time period the released messages span) are the only times these guys use that kind of language? They talk about this sort of stuff like it's a regular occurrence, and while that's fine if all involved are willing participants, the claims that there's only a few texts is a bit naive. Maybe all involved will use this as an opportunity to examine how they view women. I'm not talking about the group sex and all that fun stuff, that's grand if everyone is a willing participant, I'm talking about the way they speak. They themselves acknowledge their choice of language is bad.
"His apology probably did more damage than anything because he came across as very pompous and very arrogant," he said. "They were really the words of someone who had lost the run of themselves. "It's not the Al Porter I remember meeting as an intelligent, bright, bouncy chap from Tallaght." Asked if he would like to see the Tallaght comedian return to the stage, Callan added: "I believe in the idea of redemption, nobody should be written off. But to get back into the public eye, you need to face point blank the allegations made against you publicly."
erica74 wrote: » Can I just ask the posters defending the group chat and texts as essentially a once off or a snapshot or whatever, do you honestly think that that one night and the following morning (or whatever time period the released messages span) are the only times these guys use that kind of language? They talk about this sort of stuff like it's a regular occurrence, and while that's fine if all involved are willing participants, the claims that there's only a few texts and these texts are an anomaly is a bit naive. Maybe all involved will use this as an opportunity to examine how they view women. I'm not talking about the group sex and all that fun stuff, that's grand if everyone is a willing participant, I'm talking about the way they speak. They themselves acknowledge their choice of language is bad.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Will the be checking past WhatsApp conversations of new signings? Is this what you require for a 'fresh start'?
FrancieBrady wrote: » I have a different attitude to my partner and female friends and those that I respect than I have to other types of women. Why is that so hard to understand? My view of one type of woman is not my view of all woman kind. The same goes for how I view males.
freshpopcorn wrote: » I'm not excatly defending the group chats but my point is people do silly things from time to time for what ever reason. It doesn't make them woman haters in my opinion.
erica74 wrote: » Can I just ask the posters defending the group chat and texts as essentially a once off or a snapshot or whatever, do you honestly think that that one night and the following morning (or whatever time period the released messages span) are the only times these guys use that kind of language?]quote Probably not the first time four fellas said that and probably won't be the last. Not really bothered either what they say amongst themselves in private. It's the same reason I don't ask to have a look at my daughters diary. It's her / their business.
Mrsmum wrote: » Are you saying in the past (before current partner) you've had sex with women whom you thought of with utter contempt. Because that's the problem with Paddy and mates.
LLMMLL wrote: » You heard wrong. She did not refer to them directly as rapists in her tweets.
wexie wrote: » Out of curiosity (cause this whole discussion is descending further and further into farce)....does this qualify for Godwin?
FrancieBrady wrote: » In the past I was quite happy to meet with sexually promiscuous young women as I am sure they where happy to meet the male equivalent. Regrets, I have had a few, as I am sure women do too.
FrancieBrady wrote: » With the list of alcohol allegedly consumed I would say they were not sober. Would you drive a car first thing in the morning after that? A giddy conversation among males about a wild night out. Nothing much more to say about it. There is zero evidence in that conversation that they raped anyone and it was merely to paint them as women haters and misogynists that it was introduced as evidence at all.
freshpopcorn wrote: » Some men I know go out and hook up with people just for the ride women also do it. They don't go out looking for a future partner that they want to marry.
tretorn wrote: » , can you believe they had a consensual threesome on a Monday night and they went out again and found another woman to play with them on Tuesday night.
Mrsmum wrote: » You aren't really understanding where this is at, are you. Usually people consensually hook up for sex without feeling the need to degrade that person the next day.
facehugger99 wrote: » tretorn wrote: » , can you believe they had a consensual threesome on a Monday night and they went out again and found another woman to play with them on Tuesday night. They seemed to have a well practiced modus operandi. One of them get the woman on her own, start having sex with her before the other one suddenly appears and starts joining in. Doubt if there was any of this discussed or consented to before hand. I presume most of these women were probably quite drunk and young. The women were ****ed, cum over, tossed away and then laughed about the next day with their mates. Sound like a great bunch of lads.
facehugger99 wrote: » They seemed to have a well practiced modus operandi. One of them get the woman on her own, start having sex with her before the other one suddenly appears and starts joining in. Doubt if there was any of this discussed or consented to before hand. I presume most of these women were probably quite drunk and young. The women were ****ed, cum over, tossed away and then laughed about the next day with their mates. Sound like a great bunch of lads.
Mrsmum wrote: » You aren't really understanding where this is at, are you. Usually people consensually hook up for sex without feeling the need to degrade that person the next day, not to mention the fact that they leave on good terms.
Mrsmum wrote: » Men are strange creatures, quite happy to be at their most intimate with people they highly disrespect as opposed to those women you "view differently".
Mrsmum wrote: » not to mention the fact that they leave on good terms.
cloudatlas wrote: They weren't driving cars they were texting, they also went out to a cafe so they could all meet together unusually, without their phones to not discuss the night before... sounds sober enough to know what you're doing to me.
PJ: Here lads, let's go the café that I always go to, where all the staff know me and the rest of ye, and it's just give minutes from my place to discuss these 'sluts' and how we'll get out of this rape. Then we'll head out and do the same tonight.
