RuMan wrote: » Fair enough if ur both happy good luck 2u. Others prefer alternative lifestyles and you shouldnt project your own personal morals on them no more then they should on you.
freshpopcorn wrote: » Some of the posts I had to actually delete because it could have lead to trouble for the site. My aunt also said it that a woman would never take part in group sex. This isn't the case in my experience.
NAGDEFI wrote: » Personal morals. A lot of the so called 'alternative' lifestyles you wouldn't see animals behave like that. A lot of it is depravity. F*cking eadgits thinking they're pornstars and probably not enjoying it as much as one on one sex.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So they don't talk like that with you. That is all you know. I can tell you in the big bad world they do. I have worked in a bar, on and off and I cann assure you they do. It is nothing abnormal and it isn't about 'womankind' it is about specific types of women. They will also talk in the same way about specifiC types of males, 'horndogs' and even male 'sluts'.
freshpopcorn wrote: » I have seen friends get very upset after sex they consented to.
FrancieBrady wrote: » So you do want to be in other people's bedroom laying down the moral law. :rolleyes:
freshpopcorn wrote: » I went to college in the late 2000's went out to night clubs. I saw women get very upset for a lot of reason be it they slept with somebody and cheated, they did things that they regretted, they were afraid people might find out.
facehugger99 wrote: » Really? Seen this regularly have you? What were the circumstances?
DanDan6592 wrote: » Clearly you know nothing of these alternative lifestyles you speak of.
Silentcorner wrote: » Sorry now, you deleted posts where people demonstrated prudishness? Where they said women would never take part in group sex!! Because it would get the site in trouble???? If you only deleted some, they're be more left... Like I said, we get it, you have had threesomes...it's to be expected with legends like you!!
RuMan wrote: » Its not ur thing we get it. I'm pretty indifferent on the sex lives of others myself as long as there is consent. I'm really not sure why you are getting so upset its not like they're calling around to your house and forcing you to partake.
freshpopcorn wrote: » I deleted posts that could have lead to legal issues for the site and nothing to do with prudishness. If you actually read my posts previously in the thread. You'd know I am not into kinky sex but just have seen it at house parties.
freshpopcorn wrote: » I saw it a good bit at college to be honest. I mixed well with lots of groups. I got on well with women and guys. I saw women get historical after sex sometimes it was because they cheated on a boyfriend, others was because they were afraid mammy and daddy would find out and once because she was sore after words. In all these cases the women agreed to have sex but regretted afterwords. I often get left trying to calm them down because apparently I was understanding and nice.
NAGDEFI wrote: » I'm just giving my opinion. That's what ye're all doing Roll your eyes all you like. Whether mine is popular on here or not won't bother me too much!
FrancieBrady wrote: » No, you are moralising about the behaviour of others. And it is totally irrelevant.
facehugger99 wrote: » Struggling to understand what any of this has to do with the case this trial was about. Did any of these hysterical and regretful women decide to make a formal complaint to the relevant authorities? Why bring it up?
NAGDEFI wrote: » You're advocating your opinion and definition of 'banter'. I'm standing up for what i believe is appropriate behaviour. You have your old word 'moralysing' to bandy around and you think you're *****ng miracles debating. Well you're playing the 'lads banter card'. 'We can say what the fc*k we like in groups of lads, doesn't matter if there are young impressionable young men there, we can say what we fc*king like so ye can fc*k off! Are ye all a bunch of wimmin or wha?'
GreeBo wrote: » To the people who don't think women have threesomes...who do you think the men are having their threesomes with exactly?
Appledreams15 wrote: » Consent classes needed here. Consent classes are badly needed.
FrancieBrady wrote: » You ok there? The 'lads' used a few rude (not rude among their peeRs) words and this is enough for you to be happy their careers are ruined. You are positively salivating about it. Sooner that moralising bolleexs is gone in this country the better.
freshpopcorn wrote: » No they didn't. The reason why I brought it up was because some people can get very upset/historical after sex and it doesn't mean they were raped.
NAGDEFI wrote: » Your more worked up and upset than me. Will you need counselling when 'Jacko' never plays again for Ireland? Ryle Nugent 'and now coming on for the injured Sexton we have Paddy Jackson!! Listen to the noise in the stadium! Paddy hasn't played in 2 and a half years since he stared on the Tour to South Africa, which Ireland lost, South Africa were beaten subsequently in the autumn of 2016 by Italy'. Never fear Jacko's here!! Apparent from all the other little issues he's going to be very rusty. I think Carberry, Ross Byrne and even Ian Keatley are better bets for the no. 2 role to Sexton.
NAGDEFI wrote: » No you get idiots who don't know the boundaries of banter. They also don't realise that anything sent by phone, twitter etc is the same as spoken on the training ground or in the pub. I have more concern for the lads, in that they weren't educated properly. But i have problems with lads like you who see nothing wrong with the 'banter' and start a cycle of similar events because young fellas think 'idols' like 'Big Francie' thinks it's ok. You need to sharpen up in the head boss. What age are you?
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4c2f272c464d99a9eee64a80fbe71a0c.svg)