Mrs Shuttleworth wrote: » Their actions and behaviour and correspondences were morally puerile and act as confirmation bias to women who've have bad experiences with men.
Mrs Shuttleworth wrote: » The entire fallacy of "love" and "romance" is based initially on sex, and not on connections in any other way. Men sleep with women first then decide if they want to get to know them beyond that. Those who aren't very good at the "merry go round at the carnival" (to quote the defendants) get left behind. This case proves that quite probably they are better off.
Fann Linn wrote: » He was found not guilty of a criminal charge. He sends crass texts.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » And what about women who speak of men they hook up in a similar fashion? Calling them fcukboys and how they'd ride them till they broke them etc etc. You really think talking crass about the opposite sex is something only men do? Give over. You'd swear women were all angels the way some go on.
AudreyHepburn wrote: » He was defamed, hence the sueing for defamation. And given what he’s been through and what he has potentially lost as a result of the trial he has every right to be angry. Why are people so determined to ignore that fact that Paddy Jackson is innocent?
FixdePitchmark wrote: » If Aodhan has any real conviction - he should call the bluff of the Jackson Legal team. There would be an absoulte top of the league legal team ready to take PJ to court and would do it pro bono. The Jackson team should keep the head down.
The Talking Bread wrote: » It doesn't take away from what was said in that message group though to brink in "whattaboutery" retorts.
RuMan wrote: » Aodhan has no convictions. He'll be under pressure now not to back down from the Twitter mob. Having to apologise to Jacko will destroy his credability. Welcome to senior hurling Aodhan. Hope Jacko gets a few quid out of u
irishman86 wrote: » irishrebe wrote: » No, they don't. You must associate with total scumbags because most decent people do not talk like that. There are a minority of crass scumbags with no class who go on like that. It's very sad that you think using dehumanising and degrading language while talking about private sexual acts is in any way normal. It seems to be that people who behave like this believe that everybody behaves like this, as if they're living in a bubble. It's like people who do drugs and think everyone does drugs. No i associate with every day people I'm just not in denial how people speak The word bravado exists for a reason I honestly think you havent a clue what you are talking about, as clearly you have never met a young lad in your life Dont worry clearly there is a few like you who have lived a ridiculously sheltered life
irishrebe wrote: » No, they don't. You must associate with total scumbags because most decent people do not talk like that. There are a minority of crass scumbags with no class who go on like that. It's very sad that you think using dehumanising and degrading language while talking about private sexual acts is in any way normal. It seems to be that people who behave like this believe that everybody behaves like this, as if they're living in a bubble. It's like people who do drugs and think everyone does drugs.
Conservative wrote: » I was thrilled to read that Paddy Jackson intends to sue Aodhan O'Riordan. I have very mixed feelings on the case overall but I agree with the verdict. His tweet was disgraceful and I hope he is taken for every penny he has. I also hope those that named the victim online are prosecuted also. The internet really brings out the worst in people.
RuMan wrote: » Crass text singular
Conservative wrote: » I was thrilled to read that Paddy Jackson intends to sue Aodhan O'Riordan. I have very mixed feelings on the case overall but I agree with the verdict.
anthonyjmaher wrote: » I was delighted to hear this as well. For far too long it has been acceptable that you can say what you like about particular people, simply because the mob on Twitter and the media support what you are saying. O'Riordan tried to capitalize on Paddy Jackson's situation to get himself a few retweets and a few more supporters by jumping on the "bash the four men" bandwagon. I hope Paddy Jackson cleans him out. It's amazing. All the reports of this court case, and not one of them has mentioned the damage done to these guy's careers and lives. Blane McIlroy has lost two years of his life for purportedly showing somebody his penis. How is that justice??
BBDBB wrote: » must be one hell of a penis
Outlaw Pete wrote: » I'm not trying to take away from they way they spoke, just putting it in context. The notion that they need to answer for how they spoke in private is absurd.
steddyeddy wrote: » I think Olding's lawyer acted completely irresponsibly too TBH. He made some sort of bigoted distinction between class and tolerance of rape which was highlighted in the following article. Again, likely a symptom of Ireland's stellar ability to have barristers from a very limited socio-economic class.
Flipper22 wrote: » Again, Jackson did NOT send any crass or nasty messages. It was Mcilroy, and to a lesser extent Olding. The worst messages were from others in the group, not any of the four accused. He is completely right to consider action against anyone that is defaming him. Even the threat seems to have already led to a mass deletion of defamatory and moronic tweets. O riordan tweet was disgraceful.
anthonyjmaher wrote: » Conservative wrote: » I was thrilled to read that Paddy Jackson intends to sue Aodhan O'Riordan. I have very mixed feelings on the case overall but I agree with the verdict. I was delighted to hear this as well. For far too long it has been acceptable that you can say what you like about particular people, simply because the mob on Twitter and the media support what you are saying. O'Riordan tried to capitalize on Paddy Jackson's situation to get himself a few retweets and a few more supporters by jumping on the "bash the four men" bandwagon. I hope Paddy Jackson cleans him out. It's amazing. All the reports of this court case, and not one of them has mentioned the damage done to these guy's careers and lives. Blane McIlroy has lost two years of his life for purportedly showing somebody his penis. How is that justice??
suicide_circus wrote: » So if they had been found guilty no one would be talking about the case anymore. But because the "WRONG" verdict was reached people have a meltdown and actually take to the streets despite having no information to prove them guilty? Is this actually happening? Am I taking crazy pills?
Cyrus wrote: » All of those advocating consent classes for young men and speaking about the sense of entitlement these rugby players have regarding women , Where do they think that sense of entitlement comes from ? Girls who throw themselves at famous athletes one would imagine So should there also be a don’t throw yourself at famous people class alongside the consent classes ?
