littlemouse22 wrote: » https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2CeCgAPCJVg
anna080 wrote: » Where's my thanks??
neonsofa wrote: » Snooze ya lose
crustybla wrote: » Can't wait to see tomorrow what our Shane did. Sounds like it was a good episode. Lots a-brewing. Night lads.x
crustybla wrote: » Can't watch at the mo but I'm reading the thread and thanking posts 'cos I know I'm gonna agree when I get to watch.
anna080 wrote: » How old is Ashley? 30? Yet when "her man" playfully suggests he wants to bake that potato she runs away and tells her mommy? Fauxmance.
anna080 wrote: » Oh so it's like that ya???Whatever. I leave the thread for two days and I'm already pushed out of the clique. Whatever guys. Suck it.
MistyCheese wrote: » I know I feel all Tyra Banksy about it.
deco nate wrote: » What if I told you never in the clique....*oh crap, don't know how to put a pic in.... *
anna080 wrote: »
Adamocovic wrote: » fin12 wrote: » It was great seeing Kim on BOTS. India fancies Daniel. Only watched BOTS now, the whole India fancying Daniel was a bit of a shock!
fin12 wrote: » It was great seeing Kim on BOTS. India fancies Daniel.
MelanieC wrote: » I'm actually scared to post this........ Right, don't kill me but I'm getting kind of sick of Shortney. I think it's because he/she has monopolised the show for the last few episodes. And if he doesn't get told off for his behaviour tonight, that's so not right. Remember when the guy from baywatch got straight kicked off coz he pulled on some girl's dressing gown or something? Also, was reading the posts about Andrew & Daniel's comments that had put people off and when I think about it, Shortney has been just as crude but I think it's because he/she sounds so eloquent doing it, it's forgiven! I miss the whole India "misgendering" drama, they're all too nice nicey now. OK, I'm ready for the onslaught of shortney love. Am I going to be forced to resign from the clique? :-(
anna080 wrote: » I think Shane will be devastated to be given a formal warning for his behaviour. It's obvious he's trying to trademark the whole "consent is sexy thing" and make it his catchphrase, so I've no doubt he'll see his own actions as a massive fcuk up. I think he just got carried away and although he probably shouldn't have done that, I'd hate for him to feel too bad over it because he has shown himself to be a very decent person by how he speaks during certain precarious topics. I think comparing what he did with that fool who pulled the girls dressing gown off is incomparable, 1, because it's clear these two were messing around, and 2, that girl Chloe was mortified and really upset over what happened to her so I've no doubt that fuelled Big Brother's decision. Andrew didn't seem to gaf. To me it just looked like harmless fun between friends.
MelanieC wrote: Hence the "oh, I'd hate for him to feel too bad about himself coz he's such a nice person" when it would be "what a perv, makes me sick" were it Daniel. Which is not right on reflection. The same actions should warrant the same response really.
anna080 wrote: » I'm not blinded by anything. I'm seeing the situation for what I thought it was, two friends messing around and one pushed the boundaries slightly too far but that's it. There was no intent to intimidate there and they seemed mutually playful to me. I'm just not one for the whole shock "omg, kick him out, wtf", spiel because to me Andrew didn't seem to give a fcuk so why would I? And I'd think the same if it was any of the housemates in a similar situation.