Sweetemotion wrote: » Your back tracking is spectacular.
Bubbaclaus wrote: » Ah, I see you are all 'Black' this and 'white' that too. All I see is a rowdy teenager not liking being told what to do. Teenagers of all shapes, sizes and colour do that. To answer your skin colour divisory hypothetical situation that you have both made up and made up my response to already, if a white teenager had done similar I'd just call him a silly bastard like anyone else that age. I must go back and see the basis as to why that anecdote was even posted. Particularly in this thread with the racist OP.
Bubbaclaus wrote: » I didn't say there was an excuse for it. My point was that teenagers can be rowdy for the sake of it and there's a way of handling it. You also never stated in your original post that it was your third time going out to them. You implied you had stormed out and given out to them for an accident like some old grump. Interesting how it's all 'Black' this and 'white' that in your posts about it though. All I see is a few rowdy teenagers acting up when they are being told what to do (which teenagers of all shapes, sizes and colours will tend to do believe it or not).
The Fake Sheikh wrote: » I couldn’t give a sh*te how you or anyone else thinks I look. Your posts are there for everyone to see and I’d be surprised if many would draw a different conclusion. You tried to excuse a racial taunt from a black person and having noticed some of your posts around here I concluded that you wouldn’t excuse it from a white person. Lock me up!!!
Bubbaclaus wrote: » So now you've moved on to: 1. Imagining something I might post, if 2. hypothetically a boards user made a post 3. about a scenario that didn't happen? You can stand by that if you like, but you're making yourself look quite the fool by doing so. Maybe that's the look you're going for? Who knows, I'm not going to assume I know what you are striving for here.
Brian? wrote: » What question? All I saw was the expected hand wringing about “social issues”.
Avoiding the problems of immigrants integrating into society will have nothing to do with magic. If it happens it will be because we learn from our neighbours.
Deciding to generalise immigrants based on their skin time is part of the problem.
Brian? wrote: » That’s some serious pontification.
No one is denying there could be potential issues.
People like you are part of the issue.
Generalisation based on race is part of the problem. It leads to marginalisation and discrimination. Once ethnic minorities are marginalised you can then shout “I told you this wouldn’t work”. It’s exactly what happened in Britain and I can see it happening here.
Is this the singular cause of the social issues in Britains ghettos? No. Is it a contributing factor? Yes.
This narrow minded bull **** only makes things worse
Bambi wrote: » And yet still around 73% paleface
The Fake Sheikh wrote: » The skin colour part wasn’t in your post but you absolutely would not be making excuses for someone saying ‘white power’. Not in a million years and rightly so but you did for the black kid, so yeah, I still stand by what I said.
Odhinn wrote: » well people get selective about what "ordinary person" they quote. The country is still ranked as one of the best places to live in the world, however, which rather undermines the notion its a cesspit.
Sweetemotion wrote: » Everybody is wrong, only you are right.
Odhinn wrote: » I thought the media were wrong too? And the people that rank countries?
Sweetemotion wrote: » You know what? That's it, it's just a load of mickey. You are right everybody else is wrong.
Odhinn wrote: » ....because its a load of mickey?
Sweetemotion wrote: » It is the people who are saying there are issues, They see it from living there. Why are the media not reporting it?
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » which to be fair it's not. Going by their media and on ground the ordinary person in gemetal feels it's been a bad move
Odhinn wrote: » If they are hidden why would people be able to say there are issues, logically?
Odhinn wrote: » If the issues were that bad, then surely it wouldn't be still rated so highly? Unless of course those issues were exaggerated out of all proportion.....
anewme wrote: » can you clarify what you mean please.? Are you saying that did not happen. I am relating a first hand experience. Why would you say that? .
Odhinn wrote: » We're taking the anecdotal as fact now?
Bubbaclaus wrote: » I never even mentioned the colour of their skin in my post, so you've literally tried to make up some point I never made. You can stand by what you said all you like by it only makes you look like an idiot if you're going to accuse me of saying something that clearly isn't in my post. I've reported your post anyway so hopefully the mods will take care of you.
Sweetemotion wrote: » Or hidden.
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » why are Sweden getting it so wrong? they are having issues yet it's meant be one of best countries to live in. so what can we do that Sweden cant?
Bubbaclaus wrote: » I never even mentioned the colour of their skin in my post, so you've literally tried to make up some point I never made. You can stand by what you said all you like by it only makes you look like an idiot if you're going to accuse me of saying something that clearly isn't in my post.I've reported your post anyway so hopefully the mods will take care of you.
anewme wrote: » You were making excuses for racist abuse and blaming it on the white person in a very condescending manner. You should learn to be nicer attitude and it would not happen. There’s no excuse for waving a fist in a woman's face and saying black power threateningly. None.
anewme wrote: » You were making excuses for racist abuse and blaming it on the white person in a very condescending manner. You should learn to be nicer attitude and it would not happen. Condoning racist abuse. There’s no excuse for waving a fist in a woman's face and saying black power threateningly. None.
pitifulgod wrote: » The United States of America is an incredibly diverse country that was literally built on immigration of many ethnic minorities.
Dr Brown wrote: » Irish government official Sean Deegan said that he vast "majority" of asylum seekers he met were bogus. So yeah I would say it is a very substantial issue. "Non-Nationals" is not my term.
If this gentleman she refers to had a job in his own country, why is he looking for the protection of this State – protection that he is claiming, as an asylum seeker, is not available to him in his home country, for such is what a real refugee is. This man, clearly, is an economic migrant and not a refugee, similar to the undocumented Irish in the US.