prawnsambo wrote: » If he was DoR, they'd surely call it that, no? DoR always seems to be a head of coaches role rather than an operational/logistics role.
MJohnston wrote: » The problem with such an attitude is you lose responsibility and clarity of decision making and it becomes up to the CEO to choose who leads. Which is potentially fine if you have a rugby CEO, but we have a pure businessman. I have no doubt that our vague and ill defined structure is contributing massively to our ongoing coaching problems, because they aren't new with Kiss.
Interested Observer wrote: » Not necessarily, even at Ulster they changed the definition of the DoR role after Humphreys left, he had a much more hands-off role when it came to the rugby team. People are getting too hung up on names. They don't really matter. I don't believe there's any lack of clarity what-so-ever in the Ulster coaching setup. Kiss is in charge, Gibbes and then the rest of the coaches are below him.
MJohnston wrote: » That's just hierarchical clarity, but there's loads more to it - does Kiss have to divide his time between managing the players and coaches, and managing the business side of the rugby for example. Clarity of responsibilities more than anything else.
Interested Observer wrote: » I haven't seen any indication he does and considering he's spent his whole career as a rugby coach then that would be odd.
MJohnston wrote: » Exactly, it is very odd, but there's nobody in the management structure of Ulster between Kiss and Logan, so it's impossible that he could avoid any business involvement, or indeed having to direct operations on the non-senior teams at the club. Again, if Logan was rugby man that might be avoidable, but imo the man responsible for leading the teams should never be that close to the business side. It's just a distraction. Which is why I think head coach should be head coach, and not subordinate to anyone where coaching is concerned.
Interested Observer wrote: » Why do you need anyone between Kiss and Logan? I don't really understand this tbh, it seems like pure speculation to me? I doubt there's anyone between Cullen and Mick Dawson either but that seems pretty normal. Kiss is the head coach. He's called something else but he's the head coach. I haven't seen any evidence to the contrary.
MJohnston wrote: » Take a look at the IRFU guidelines for Director of Rugby and you'll see all the stuff they are supposed to do that isn't coaching. If Kiss isn't Director of Rugby, then he didn't need to be given that title.
.ak wrote: » Rewatching the game, for the first try Ringrose is an absolute cute hooer. Byrne calls a move off a phase which appears to be a centre runs a short crash diagonal line with a blindside winger coming across. The move almost breaks down due slow ball, but Ringrose rescues it with a really good timed run and completely takes the defender out of the game, and makes sure to hold them after the ball goes. Ferg has a massive gap to run through because of him. It’s that sort of smarts/Rugby IQ that was mentioned earlier on the thread that will make Ringrose an Irish great for years to come.
.ak wrote: » Other notes from rewatching it... Henshaw may no longer utilize the flashy plays that brought him into the limelight for Connacht, but he’s just such an intelligent player. His carrying, tackling and work rate make up for the lack of guile and zip. His passing is so clean and crisp. That pass-on for larmours second was world class. Without making the headlines he quietly went around his business and allowed everyone else around him to shine. Another motm preformer for me. Ringrose did a lot better than people are giving him credit for, No trade mark line breaks but consistently spotted soft shoulders, made yards, and sucked in defenders. His reaction to turn overs a d sloppy ball was incredible, for the larmour almost try he dives on a loss ball and is popping it up for a support runner without even looking, pity about the injury cuz he’s looking sharp. Jack Conan seemed to be on JVDF duty. We picked up so many injures but never looked troubled. Our depth is truly a massive asset to me.
.ak wrote: » Other notes from rewatching it... Scott Fardy is some sort of rugby demigod. Larmour may have put on the dazzle but Scott was everywhere. That pass to McFadden for his try was seriously impressive, what’s even better is he calls it with McFadden a phase earlier. Good communicators on a rugby field are winners. Henshaw may no longer utilize the flashy plays that brought him into the limelight for Connacht, but he’s just such an intelligent player. His carrying, tackling and work rate make up for the lack of guile and zip. His passing is so clean and crisp. That pass-on for larmours second was world class. Without making the headlines he quietly went around his business and allowed everyone else around him to shine. Another motm preformer for me. Ringrose did a lot better than people are giving him credit for, No trade mark line breaks but consistently spotted soft shoulders, made yards, and sucked in defenders. His reaction to turn overs a d sloppy ball was incredible, for the larmour almost try he dives on a loss ball and is popping it up for a support runner without even looking, pity about the injury cuz he’s looking sharp. Jack Conan seemed to be on JVDF duty. Tackles everything that moved was given freedom to leave the line at will, like letting a dog off a leash. Ulster were wary of any quick play because of him. We picked up so many injures but never looked troubled. Our depth is truly a massive asset to me.
.ak wrote: » McFadden tho... that was some performance. Forget the two tries, his work rate was outstanding. In the 2nd half when we decided to pick it up another gear he was a man possessed. At one stage he runs a latch on a prop pick n drive, carries him over the line, another forward pod run the next phase and he’s the first man to clear out! At the time I thought it was Deegan or someone but watching back I was surprised to see a 14 on the back! He had a massive, massive performance, and aside from the line breaks and tries he rolled up his sleeves and delivered total Rugby performance.
Yeah_Right wrote: » I agree. It was a fantastic all round performance by McFadden. If Adam Byrne played like that, everyone would be going full Venjur over it and we'd all be drowning.
Former Former wrote: » Ricky Lutton was very vocal about the non-native character of the Ulster line-up. Considering he was an Ulster player up to 8 months ago, I think it's fair to assume that others in the current squad would share his feelings.
Buer wrote: » I think Lowe will have next week off, actually. McFadden, Larmour and Daly all looking comfortable along with RK and Nacewa. Lowe looks great but if they were going to drop JGP they wouldn't have left McCarthy on the bench until very late and the game was long won.
swiwi_ wrote: » Always a wee frisson when Buer is wrong :P
Bazzo wrote: » First Nahologate and now this. He's losing it.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://wd.vanillicon.com/v2/dd23f423fe14831a2a84d9f17c825ecc.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w6.vanillicon.com/v2/6081e4655739e0887aaf16222f88b015.svg)
