JackTaylorFan wrote: » No, not all what I'm trying to do... just saying it was bloody rampant And i get the hypocrisy of someone calling Jimmy Saville a paedo whilst rocking out to a Jimmy Page number. Led Zeppelin are **** anyways.
Don Kiddick wrote: » You're the one bringing whataboutery & Led Zeppelin into this , nobody else...not much of an argument there is it... Oh A is a kiddie fiddler...but sure B was doing it too? ...that's some messed up thinking
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Look for the part on the thread where I said I liked Elvis... you won't find it...
Don Kiddick wrote: » Irrelevant
JackTaylorFan wrote: » You are trying to say by posting in a thread I am somehow advocating child abuse. Yeah, okay... No more oxygen for you...
Don Kiddick wrote: » Oh, the ninja edit wasn't fast enough... Your "everybody else was doing it" was a poor attempt at defence in itself....please try harder.
Wompa1 wrote: » Took black music and repackaged it for a white audience
Don Kiddick wrote: » Well, he was in the army and sleeping with her when she was 14...not the only young person he slept with...even Natalie Wood remarked when she was being set up with him that she was too old for him..she was 18. I genuinely never liked his music, I found out about the other stuff later I don't think it's sanctimonious to say you don't respect a child abuser?... But look, I'll leave it alone....I'm in a minority here
Lorelli! wrote: » I think it may have been a different time and I say that as a woman/girl who could claim to have been "groomed" by loads of blokes when I was 14. All my brothers "pals" tried it on with me then, specifically when i turned 14 because i "changed". I wouldnt go into details on that but with some it was difficult othèrs just backed away straight away. My own mother was 16/17 when she got married. Not defending anything from Elvis because I don't know the whole story of him and Priscilla. I do find it, sanctimonious though for anyone to judge his life when people are only putting up parody threads to have a bit of fun and enjoy the music he produced?
JackTaylorFan wrote: » I suspect KidDick's intention is to derail the thread rather than raise awareness of historical child abuse... Anyways to more relevant matters Let's not allow ourselves to get weighed down in the heavy juxtaposition of priests dressed as Elvisesesesesesessssss... It's a whole child molesting minefield...
Don Kiddick wrote: » You're entitled to your opinion, as I am mine
Don Kiddick wrote: » ciao
JackTaylorFan wrote: » A fitting sign off. Sums up, in one word, your whole sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, faux virtue-signalling ridiculously pompous attitude better than I could have in a a million.
Lorelli! wrote: » Ah ffs Don! I think 14 is too young for anyone to be in a serious relationship or anything like that but as I said at that time people were getting married at at least 16. Things are different now. My dad still classes me as a kid at 30 plus rightfully so But I don't think it is a fair assessment to brand Elvis as some kind of child abusèr and Priscilla Presley has never come out as saying that's how she felt or was treated at that time afaik
Don Kiddick wrote: » Was never a fan of his music, and tbh I can't respect a guy who liked to have sex with children
Dr Crayfish wrote: » I remember years ago reading about Elvis, he used to get girls all around 14ish to line up in his house and inspect them to see if they fit his criteria of being allowed stay in his house. He had a weird thing for their feet. Also David Bowie banged loads of child groupies. I wonder if he was still around now if the hounds would be out to get him, given what's going on nowadays. Instead he was made out to be some kind of Saint when he died.
splinter65 wrote: » Well Robert Plant and Jimmy Page are still very much around. You can set the hounds on them if you like?
Dr Crayfish wrote: » I'm unaware of whatever it is they may have done. If they did sleep with children, how come they were spared from the recent purge of 70s celebrities?
splinter65 wrote: » Because none of the young teen aged girls who slept with Led Zeppelin or any of the rock groups of the time have complained. How could they complain? If you sneak past hotel receptions and climb up fire escapes to get to the hotel bedroom of someone in order to have sex with them it’s difficult to come back later and complain.
Dr Crayfish wrote: » Right but it's still pretty gross on behalf of the Rock Stars.
JackTaylorFan wrote: » Google Lori Maddox... not only has she not complained... she fondly remembers being fondled by both Bowie and Page as a minor
JackTaylorFan wrote: » We are all in agreement it was gross. Nobody on this thread has ever said anything to the contrary - despite what KIdDick would have you believe. Other hideous abuses of groupies have been well documented... like stuffing a passed out girl's holes full of dead fish in a hotel room - a very famous tale.