lazybones32 wrote: » I think they should stfu. Or go liberate the rohingya in person. You'd swear the freedom of Dublin is up there with the Nobel's the way the boys go on...
SuperSean11 wrote: » Freedom isn’t free Vote Trump Make Ireland great again
10000maniacs wrote: » I don't know, but should it be used as a political bargaining tool or is it ok? I don't think it should be in Geldofs or Bonos remit to put pressure on the city to rescind Aung San Suu Kyi's award. Is this yet another example of liberal fascism.
Zebra3 wrote: » Bob Geldof has accepted honours in the name of the British Empire. I don't think anyone should listen to somebody who is happy to accept an award steeped in genocide, slavery and ethnic cleansing. PS: The Burmese one is a kunt. Bono too.
Pithythefool wrote: » Giving the nobel peace prize to barack Obama for.....something*.....was the death knell for its respect.
...something*...
(being black?)
Dr Crayfish wrote: » Who cares what these 2 pontificating gobsh*tes have to say?
Joeytheparrot wrote: » So basically you dont think Geldof/Bono should have have freedom of expression and you are calling Geldof and Bono fascists. Bizarre.
Hande hoche! wrote: » Telling that the article is written about six years after the prize was awarded.
10000maniacs wrote: » Bono, Geldof, RTE, BBC and certain forums should allow us to make up our own minds about such issues. These people and organizations are not supreme custodians of the absolute truth that should be agreed with at all times. I will make up my own mind about it. And so should Dublin City Council. Let them give back their awards. All they are doing showing disrespect to their home town. Ronald Reagan once said "if fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism." So very true.
Odhinn wrote: » ....and as a man who backed more than a few death squads, he'd know allright.
dotsman wrote: » She was awarded the Freedom of the city because of U2. That's why it matters when they ask Dublin City Council to remove it from her. U2 are doing the right thing. If they didn't, the lazy cúnts would be criticising Bono/U2 for not doing so. So now, let's hear all the lazy cúnts complain when they are doing the right thing*.*For the purpose of this post, the definition of a "lazy cúnt" is someone, at the mere mention of bono/u2, have to post that they don't like him/them. It wasn't funny/cool/real 30 years ago, and it's just lazy and retarded repeating the same ****e in 2017. Please find some other way to entertain yourself.
Pithythefool wrote: » What a pretentious load of shyte, the whole thing. What did U2 ever do for anyone? What about your woman? She got locked up for 5 thousand years in Claymation land, so some eejits in Dublin give her the "freedom" of the city. What? I threw a knackered toaster at a bus earlier today, cant wait for the Japanese to give me the Okinawa Medal of Outstanding Achievement for Awesome Biscuits
worded wrote: » Yeah and build a wall around limerick and make them pay for it
10000maniacs wrote: » Love your generalization soundbite. Reagan took a stand against communism in Central America. Maybe the alternative would have been ten times worse, who knows?
Odhinn wrote: » Reagan "took a stand" by backing any goon who trundled up to him, and it resulted in hundreds of thousands of dead.
brainfreeze wrote: » No it wasn't. Only people that don't understand the history Nobel peace prize say that. It has even been given to people that have been accused of terrorism and of committing war crimes. The Nobel Peace prize has always been given to certain people as a guilt award. To make sure a certain leader fulfills a promise or statement they have made, by bringing light to it to the entire world, and therefor pressuring them to follow through otherwise facing shame to the entire planet for being a bull****ter. That's what they did with Obama. They wanted to empower a specific promise he made. No it wasn't for being black, also the "something*" isn't a mystery. It was written on the award, stated in the announcement, and reported by the world media. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for his promises on nuclear nonproliferation . The something* is nuclear nonproliferation.Which his administration did have great strides in, with both Russia and Iran. This whole "It's lost it's meaning since Obama!!1!" narrative is drivel spread by Rupert Murdochs various media outlets (Fox/Sky/Tabloids), to play on peoples ignorance of the history of the award. It clearly worked, here you are 10 years later repeating it.
Pithythefool wrote: » The mental hoops you have to jump through to get to this conclusion..."a guilt award", "I believe the dribble put in the statement", "I cant see any precedent set beforehand", "I can ignore Obama's admitted confusion over receiving it" and on and on. I think I'll solve world hunger sometime in the future. That would be nice. Now please give me a nice, big sum of money to "guilt" me into actually doing it. Great stuff! Reading between the gulf in the lines, Obama was the first black president in the united states and the idiots couldn't contain themselves with "virtue signalling". So yeah, the respect for the award took a big blow.
