LadyMacBeth_ wrote: » I've had a gay guy grab my boobs, I suppose I'd see it in the same way as a straight woman grabbing my boobs, I'd be a bit taken aback but I wouldn't be overly annoyed, I suppose because there's no sexual element to it. I do think that as a woman I get away with more if I do grope a man, a lot of my posts are smutty but if I were a male poster I think I would have been called up on it, or possibly called up on some of my posts anyway, but by being female I am let off the hook. Having said all of that though, by and large, the people who have groped me the most have been straight men, now I am not saying that all straight men do this, they are in the minority, but to clarify that I don't think that gay lads are the biggest culprits, well they haven't been in my experience anyway.
rusty cole wrote: » ok so two total strange men grab your boobs, guys you never knew or had any relationship with, the difference is one is gay and the other is straight!! you wouldn't be offended by the gay guy cos there's no sexual element to it? but you'd #metoo the f*ck outa the straight guy???.
EndaHonesty wrote: » Do you have a link to backup your claim that TV3 were looking to reboot "Jim'll fix it"? TBH I think you're making it up as I do not believe for one second that any broadcaster would even consider producing anything so closely linked to Jimmy Saville.
alan partridge aha wrote: » Perhaps the reason is that there are far more straight guys
Brego888 wrote: » Think you missed the joke
EndaHonesty wrote: » Think you misunderstand what a joke is. First and foremost they are supposed to be funny...
LadyMacBeth_ wrote: » Nope, I'd be more annoyed about the straight guy and I'd tell him to get off and that would be the end of it. No #metoo or sexual assault claims.
Brego888 wrote: » It wasn't my joke. But it certainly went over your head.
EndaHonesty wrote: » You're implying it was identifiable as a joke. I disagree.
Roger Hassenforder wrote: » Ah! The cow was blind-folded...
EndaHonesty wrote: » Trace back Roger instead of lazily joining in at the end! :rolleyes:
TeddyTedson wrote: » Something tells me he's going to become a Channel 4 star after all of this.
Titzon Toast wrote: » Has anyone seen the messages floating around on WhatsApp? He really should've been more careful.
everlast75 wrote: » For the record, I don't care if he rode one guy or twenty guys, whether he uses course language in describing those times with his mates, snorts cocaine or is high as a kite before he performs on stage. I don't care and I don't need nor want to know. It is his own business. The sexual misconduct is all that should be talked about. Anything else is just salaciousness and we really should try rise above that.
glenfieldman wrote: » No any chance of a screen grab ? or a PM ?
pilly wrote: » Couldn't agree more, people now have such a tendency for tearing apart every detail of someone's life because they make a mistake in one area. Let he without sin and all that.
jack hackett wrote: » The thing is, just because Porter isnt in the media any longer doesnt mean hes not still a sex pest, the guy should seek help as he obviously has a big problem, not only has he destroyed his panto, radio and tv careers but he cant very well do stand up any longer, all his material was filth and now that he has been outed as a sex pest he cant very well do that kind of show any longer now that people know he is a sex pest, in a way i do feel (no pun intended) sorry for the guy but how did he ever think it was acceptable to go around grabbing guys by the goolies? you just cant do that type of thing
Bambi wrote: » Like the sin of touching up mental patients? I'm pretty comfortable casting stones in this instance
splinter65 wrote: » He will be able to do stand up though. Plenty of people have no problem with his behavior and don’t know what all the fuss is about.