FCIM wrote: » I see all the real tough cases have taken to Facebook... "F*****g peado f**k" "He sent pictures of his d**k to what he though was young girls and he admitted it. He is a filthy scumbag are you one too?" "BETTER HOPE I DONT COME ACROSS YOU IN DUBLIN YOU DIRTY B*****D." Shakespearean quality if ever I saw it!
LionelNashe wrote: » He's hoping Ross Kemp will see the video and ask him to be mates. I had to laugh at his TV-cop-drama-inspired interrogation technique, and also when they asked the guy if he realised that what he had done was wrong, and would he agree not to do it again if they let him go, and then they said "Tough, we're not letting you go." His heart must have broke.
ohnonotgmail wrote: » who in the name of jaysus are ye all taking about now? who is Mr Vigo?
Stab*City wrote: » I agree it is a bit confrontational the way there snare these rotten humans. I know they deserve jail but they also deserve for their whole lives to be ruined which in effect this group is doing. I cant help but smile at the fact that these people are being exposed online which i think is much worse than 12 months in jail.
Jim Bob Scratcher wrote: » Don't forget about the knobs posting about how many friends he has left :rolleyes:
LionelNashe wrote: » Are they equal opportunity vigilantes, or are they trying to target outsiders, such as Irish and Muslims?
anna080 wrote: » I really didn't like the main hunter guy. There's a way to do this kind of thing if you're going to do it at all and to just take so much joy and revel in a miserable situation is just wrong. "Merry Christmas ya filthy animal"... like what? There's no need to be such a gowl like. Also he kept referring to him coming over and "meeting our girls".. His concerns should be about all underage girls not just the ones that fall within the parameters of the UK.
humberklog wrote: » Huh??? There was no girl.
Chrongen wrote: » How can an imaginary girl have parents? Unless they're imaginary parents. But then how do imaginary parents have views? Imaginary views?
Rubberchikken wrote: » How can someone be charged with an intention. There was no actual girl in this particular case. Vigilantism at best.
wakka12 wrote: » Good thats he's caught. But really hate those kind of vigilante groups, they're completely unprofessional. You just know they're getting off on being famous for catching criminals rather than anything about childrens welfare, well they probably care but its definitely secondary. otherwise they wouldn't act the way they do
anna080 wrote: » I really didn't like the main hunter guy. There's a way to do this kind of thing if you're going to do it at all and to just take so much joy and revel in a miserable situation is just wrong. "Merry Christmas ya filthy animal"... like what? There's no need to be such a gowl like. Also he kept referring to him coming over and "meeting our girls".. His concerns should be about all underage girls not just the ones that fall within the parameters of the UK. Methinks someone watches too many tv crime shows.
Stab*City wrote: » Im sure the parents of the young girl he was grooming would have a different view of him.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » They guys on the video are a bit dum de dum, a bit simple.
orangerhyme wrote: » The rte producer doesnt seem too bright either. The fake girls profile looked clearly fake. Also these "catch a predator" style shows have been around for years. "Arrested Development" even satirised it years ago