torqtorq wrote: » Its beyond me why anyone would think that Aki has no equal as a 12. The Ulster midfield has had Aki's number for the past 3 seasons. In their most recent game Aki made all of 21 metres from 16 carries for an average of 1.3 m per carry. McCloskey made 46 metres from 10 carries for an average of 4.6 m per carry. That is 3.5 times further per carry! As for offloading, McCloskey wins this hands down. His limbs are so long that he can reach round the corner of the defender and pass backwards as witnessed by some of Ulster's early season tries. He can also reach over the top of most defenders and offload that way, something that the much shorter Aki cannot do. Aki's Bosh game is actually not that effective against a good defending side and is certainly inferior to McCloskeys.
pickarooney wrote: » Ugh. We have players like Ringrose and Carbery and you want to play Gattyball?
[Deleted User] wrote: » We could let things get a bit silly and have a backline of Stockdale, McCloskey, Aki, Byrne and Henshaw. Would be by a long way our largest ever backline with a lot of hard carriers yet still plenty of guile. It's a real shame if Adam Byrne can't develop his game because his size and ability to beat the first man would be so valuable on the international stage. With a backline like that and with the pack coming along as they are we could really bully teams.
Deleted User wrote: » James Downey with a surprise recall...
pickarooney wrote: » It's all a ruse. Play the 6N with beefy giants (Peter Robb to get a call up soon?) and spring Carbery at 12 for the world cup.
Webbs wrote: » It will be interesting come the world cup how Ireland set up as a lot of countries are now looking at a 10 -12 playmaker, something that Schmidt is not looking at with his selections to date. (the pairing for the Fiji game shows a clear marker being set down?)
D14Rugby wrote: » While i think henshaw is a better 12 for Ireland i believe he was saying things henshaw does better than aki not implying he can't do other things well
irishfan9 wrote: » henshaw can't tackle? can't pass? can't offload? weird... how is he a professional rugby player?
ronnoco13 wrote: » 12 aki , 13 ringrose , 15 henshaw. Henshaw hasn't played at 15 in years but he said it during an interview after he cam back from lions tour. It has a lot of potential if it works out would definitely be worth trying out for a few games
Neil3030 wrote: » I just can't see how anyone gets in at 12 ahead of Bundee. He can distribute as well as any, bosh it as well as any, and then there's his offloading game which I'm sure we'll build some moves around. He also fit seemlessly into defensive duties last week. Everyone else is fighting for the 13 shirt, imo.
Neil3030 wrote: » Pretty much everything; kicking may be Henshaws only edge on him.
irishfan9 wrote: » what can aki do that henshaw can't?
Neil3030 wrote: » Who is the better inside centre? Oh and before you respond to this - you're wrong.
irishfan9 wrote: » Bundee should never be the first name down.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Yeah from what I've seen of everyone so far I still think Ringrose is likely to be first choice out of all the centres. Horses for courses and fitness will dictate Bundi or Henshaw at 12. Interesting that Henshaw has a decent chance of getting gametime at fullback this weekend. Still think McCloskey could force his way into contention with the way he is going this season.
FellasFellas wrote: » From the original squad named, is Adam Byrne the only player not to be in a 23 yet?
Neil3030 wrote: » Playmaky 12s need to play behind a monster pack. We're big enough but we don't bully top teams the way England do, for example. I'm not in love with the idea us going down the Wales route either, mind you, i.e., planets colliding in midfield. I think Bundee/Ringrose will have the best balance.
Bazzo wrote: » I ****ing knew that was coming