Cienciano wrote: » Ken is loving sticking the boot into Jose! As someone who doesn't like Jose, that was an enjoyable podcast
Nokotan wrote: » George has a recent issue with player's names.
lawred2 wrote: » How were you on Jimmy McGee? nice use of garrulous btw
“Real Madrid are like a rabbit in the glare of the headlights in the face of Manchester United’s attacks. But this rabbit comes with a suit of armour in the shape of two precious away goals.”
Loafing Oaf wrote: » I'm the opposite, never rated Hamilton at all, find him far too garrulous, always on hand with an irrelevant stat.
lawred2 wrote: » Listening to the 1000th pod this morning on my extra long commute... Really enjoying it. There are very few commentators with the natural sense of timing that Hamilton has. Like everything - we won't know how good he was until he's gone. He is the voice of Irish football for me. So many people would go into raptures about Jimmy McGee but I could hardly stand him as a commentator. I always thought George was in a league of his own.
PhilipsR wrote: » Dots1982 wrote: » You see irony, I see a queue of posters coming up to have a pop at someone who had critical views of the pod....much as I predicted. It’s the mood around here...it’s so ingrained that those that do it don’t even acknowledge to themselves that they can’t handle criticism of the pod. I had a look at your posts on the search function. I only looked at the first two pages but it was all negativity. It just seems bizarre that you'd keep listening when you don't have much positive thoughts at all about it.
Dots1982 wrote: » You see irony, I see a queue of posters coming up to have a pop at someone who had critical views of the pod....much as I predicted. It’s the mood around here...it’s so ingrained that those that do it don’t even acknowledge to themselves that they can’t handle criticism of the pod.
lawred2 wrote: Two different Tonys I think
Utopia Parkway wrote: Tony Evans lads. It's not that hard. Was the football editor of The Times up to recently enough I think.
Utopia Parkway wrote: But yes he is a professional grump.
PhilipsR wrote: » One thing I find disappointing (and would make the pods longer) is that they don't revisit items they've discussed. For example, they discussed the World Series Game 7 on Wednesdays pod and all about the build up with US Murphy, but then it's Friday now and not a mention of how the game went or anything. Would be no harm having an extra ten mins on a pod discussing the outcome too.
Trent Houseboat wrote: » I'm shocked that there hasn't been a grand triggering from the usual outrage brigade on here railing against political correctness and right-on south Dublin leftism after Jayo and the lads suggested that racism was bad yesterday. They're either less petty than I thought or have stopped listening.
batistuta9 wrote: » Doesn't he go by Tony Barret also What was he saying anyway?
Utopia Parkway wrote: » Tony Evans lads. It's not that hard. Was the football editor of The Times up to recently enough I think. But yes he is a professional grump.
Dots1982 wrote: » lawred2 wrote: » Everywhere the realm of the weird a bit here. I think it best if we just move on. Apologies to all for any role I've played in derailing this thread. Best me and the others he was dismissive towards are going to get by way of an apology. Hopefully you post here in a way that fosters discussion from now on.
lawred2 wrote: » Everywhere the realm of the weird a bit here. I think it best if we just move on. Apologies to all for any role I've played in derailing this thread.
Dots1982 wrote: » Has the world/this forum gone mad!? Why the **** would I give a flying **** about a ****ing 80s goalkeeper’s ****ing journey towards ****ing Twitter self-discovery.
Seamy Fitz wrote: Ken on RWC was priceless. The "gold Lamborghini" metaphors had me in stitches. It certainly made me feel better about Ireland not getting the RWC.
this Liverpool-based imbecile
that Liverpool fella
That Liverpool guy
that Liverpool guy
that joyless Liverpool guy