Hitman3000 wrote: » That's brilliant for you, however not everyone is in a position to spend hours planning, shopping and cooking. Cutting out the sugary snacks and drinks goes a long way and takes little or no time just a strong will.
Romantic Rose wrote: » A chicken and vegetable stirfry takes 20 minutes to prepare and cook. Not hard to do. Nutrition is so important for a growing child. I detest laziness and taking the easy option.
Hitman3000 wrote: » Nope, other parents.
B0jangles wrote: » Odd that all of your invented phrases are written in a woman's voice, especially given that the obesity issue is slightly worse among men than it is women.
givyjoe wrote: » So you don't spend hours meticulously shopping for food, planning and preparing meals then..?
Romantic Rose wrote: A chicken and vegetable stirfry takes 20 minutes to prepare and cook. Not hard to do.
AnneFrank wrote: » think you touched a nerve there Rose !!
Romantic Rose wrote: Feeding a little child plates of junk on a regular basis is disgusting and will give them poor health in the future.
....... wrote: » Do you?
....... wrote: » It seems to knacker you so much that you neglect your relationship though.
Romantic Rose wrote: » Very mature. Stick to the topic at hand.
Romantic Rose wrote: » Yes I have great empathy for innocent little children who are weaned onto junk. I am in a position to see what parents put into children's lunch boxes and I think to myself, do you not care about your child and their health. Nutrition and developing good diet habits early is an integral part of parenting.
Wibbs wrote: » It is indeed. Personally I would have less sympathy for men who get fat and then own about it. Now I'm not talking about people who are properly obese. IMHO that's more of an actual emotional/psychological illness coming out as weight gain. I mean the guys who are a bit porky, soft around the middle, let themselves go sorta thing. Men have fewer excuses for gaining such weight. We have way more testosterone than women and that hormone builds lean tissue and "burns" fat(in the days when they had eunuchs one of the most obvious signs was weight gain). We have more of that lean tissue and less fatty tissue than women and our hormone profiles don't vary nearly so much during life and we don't get pregnant.
....... wrote: » Youre the one pontificating about spending hours meticulously planning, shopping and cooking meals for children. While failing to mention that all this work has you knackered.
Romantic Rose wrote: » Of course I am. Feeding a little child plates of junk on a regular basis is disgusting and will give them poor health in the future.
Romantic Rose wrote: » Part of my parcel of being a parent. If I wanted an easy life, I could go to Iceland, load the freezer up and throw nutritionally dense chicken nuggets and chips at my children every day. I'd rather not take the easy road. I care about their health.
pilly wrote: » Must be great being perfect is it Rose? Do you actually know how horrible you sound? If you're in a position to see what parents put into their childrens lunch boxes I presume you're in a school or something in which case you're not doing your job very well as any school my children ever went to did not allow junk food in lunch boxes.
osarusan wrote: » The 'it's because they eat too much' argument only goes so far though. It is always true but that doesn't mean it's always illuminating. how bizzare. It's true, accept it.
....... wrote: » Arent you great? Do you pat yourself on the back and tell yourself how great you are every day?