PARlance wrote: » Meath 96.
Baron Kurtz wrote: » Bit of a Mandela effect with Dublin. They won the SM 3 times from 1983-2011. Hardly prolific. From 2000, they have won it 4 times. Pretty impressive, true, but many are talking like these latter achievements are unprecedented in GAA. They're certainly not. Lately the soundbytes seem to ring out like they've been whipping everyone for decades, which isn't the case.
davedanon wrote: If Dublin weren't there, how many All-Irelands would Mayo have won by now?
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » You could argue Mayo should have beaten Dublin in those 3 AI? If's and but's but they really should have won in 2013 and this year anyway
davedanon wrote: » If Dublin weren't there, how many All-Irelands would Mayo have won by now?
corny wrote: I've heard this more than once now and its baffling me. Why should they have won? They lost the battle (much like Sunday) when the game was a contest in the second half. Their goal was the only score they got from play in the second half in 2013 IIRR.
bucketybuck wrote: » Of course, it must also be noted that this Dublin side getting repeatedly challenged by other top sides would only make them a better team as well.
bucketybuck wrote: » I do think this Dublin team is one of the greatest ever, for many reasons, and that they will probably do 5 in a row. However, I also think that if this exact Dublin side were around ten years ago it would be a different story. They would still be a great side and would win some titles, but I can easily see the Tyrone, Kerry and Armagh teams of the early to mid 2000's beating them in crunch games. Repeatedly now Dublin have only just scraped over the line against Kerry and Mayo sides that simply aren't as good as some of the teams mentioned. Mayo stood toe to toe with them but 2005 Tyrone would have brought just as much energy and physicality but allied to a far greater scoring threat than Moran and O'Connor. Kerry also had that scoring threat, defenders who could cope with the fast and mobile Dublin forwards, and importantly had a lot of cute hoors who would have seen out those tight games instead of losing by a point every time. I think Dublin have changed the game a little, there were always teams that were the best in the country, the problem now is that Dublin don't have the best 15, they have the best 30, I genuinely think any of their subs would be a guaranteed starter on any other team in the country. The extremely high level of quality across so deep a squad gives them options and an edge in games that is very hard to compete with. But they are beatable and I think a lot of those other great sides would beat them, so if the criteria is who would beat who its hard to call them the greatest team ever. Of course, it must also be noted that this Dublin side getting repeatedly challenged by other top sides would only make them a better team as well.
Bridge93 wrote: » The Wexford team of the 1910's being criminally overlooked. 4 in a row and that after losing the previous two finals.
Gael85 wrote: » You could argue that Kerry team lost all the tight games in the noughties against Armagh/Tyrone. Armagh 02, Tyrone 05 and 08 were games Kerry lost in the melting pot.
Sonny678 wrote: » So many counties are going through a bad time. This means the competition is weaker.