Arsemageddon wrote: » Internment worked really well in Northern Ireland, there were no repercussions whatsoever. That's why the troubles ended peacefully when it was introduced in 1971.
AudreyHepburn wrote: » By associating I meant being involved in extremisim with your friend or sympathising with him, keeping secret his plans for an attack etc not just greeting each other on th street.
tomwaterford wrote: » I am noway involved with terrorism...never will be (it's day is gone in Ireland)
tomwaterford wrote: » Do you think terrorists talk openly of their plans?
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » The type of explosion that was to weak to break the train, so a fire ball travelled both ways , engulfing people within its flames. It's a nasty attacked, people are scarred for life, both physically and emotionally.
Billy86 wrote: » That's not associating, that's plotting, colluding and sympathising. Big difference there.
gitzy16v wrote: » Yes educated,as in somebody who can read,unlike you. "Im no expert" means "know nothing about" now does it? Go back to school.
todders wrote: » Miss the point much? :rolleyes:
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Look you know well what I meant, stop trying to twist my words.
Billy86 wrote: » No I did not, because I am not a psychic. Your position seems to be changing with every second or third post, so it's not exactly easy to keep up with this scattergun approach of ideas devoid of much thought.
Bambi wrote: » It didnt work in the north but worked really well in the republic in previous instances
gandalf wrote: » Wtf? :Rolleyes:
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » So many little comments from witnesses about school kids, and how the adults simply pushed and trampled them to get away, didn't help them, did the opposite. That's so not cool. Every witness seems to mention how kids were trampled while adults left them behind.
beans wrote: » These attacks are intended to cause this kind of societal break-down. This kind of reaction is almost as saddening to me as hearing of fatalities.
M!Ck^ wrote: » It shows that people are more and more terrified. Exactly what these scumbags want to happen.
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » I just hope none of you ever have yourself or a loved one involved in a terror attack. I was about 500 yards from one myself a decade ago for a side which in general I thought I was on. It stays with you for long long time. Hence why I end up having a higher quota in threads like this then some of the norm. It just seems some of you are all too happy with way things are. Its same faces making fun of other posters opinions.
AudreyHepburn wrote: » Who put you up on that pedestal? You know what I meant and no amount of blustering and pontificating will change that. Instead of acting high and mighty every post why don't you try offering some suggestions of your own?
gitzy16v wrote: » Seriously? Thats a fcuking disgrace.
Arsemageddon wrote: » You could make a case for it having worked during the civil war. On the other occasions it was introduced to deal with the RA it could be argued that it only worked because the numbers interned were very small, and the authorities knew all of the leaders involved. Different times, different circumstances.
BorneTobyWilde wrote: » Only going what why I heard witnesses describe. One woman said there was a school kid, 8-10 on the ground screaming and everyone ran and left him in the heart of it. She said he was injured maybe, and needed to be carried, but no one did.
Cheerful Spring wrote: » Have you got a source for this news report?