Deleted User wrote: » ...today I brought my daughter to the playground to meet Slovakian friends with their kids. Also met my cousin and his African partner and their little daughter. After that, I went to my Turkish Muslim barber and to her delight he produced a lollipop. And I thought, she'll grow up experiencing diversity and cultures that I could only dream of when I was a child in white Catholic Ireland in the late '70s and '80s. And it felt good.
Widdershins wrote: » I recently had a conversation about Jehova's Witnesses. It's amusing the way the same people who deliberately overlook the failings and flaws of Islam for example tend not to be shy about not only condemning the JW's but I suspect keeping their distance from them in such social situations as the OP describes. And imo the JW's are another weird cult with its own creepy conduct and its own parallel society. I just cannot imagine this post with the ''Jehova's Witness barber even produced a lollipop! swoon!'' but maybe I'm wrong. JW's maybe don't hold any allure because they're sort of familiar. I don't get the love affair with the exotic here. It's like the grass is always greener on the other side.
Deleted User wrote: » His is the only one I know. Think the Slovakians and African are Christians of some form or other.
GerryDerpy wrote: It is an instinct. It is slowly being unselected though. But back in the days of tribal living it was beneficial to be a racist or have a dislike to others outside of your population. Modern day racism and xenophobia is a carry over from that trait selection. It is this trait that makes people kill off or drive out outsiders from their area, in order to best preserve their own kind. Hitler being the most extreme case.
philstar wrote: » kinda ironic that you would use a Ian Paisley quote supporting the GAA
fatknacker wrote: » Slovakian, African and Turkish Muslim. But you left us hangin with the religion of the Slovak and the religion and country of the African. Why does the Turkish Muslim get their country and religion a mention but not the rest? Is it because he produced a lollipop. So uncharacteristic of those lads!
fryup wrote: » oh its definitely a good thing we've become more sophisticated and cosmopolitan as a nation instead of the backward backwater that we use to benow if only we could get rid of the GAA
Benjamin Buttons wrote: » NEVER NEVER NEVER
Deleted User wrote: » As I said, I grew up in a very Catholic country...do you think Catholicism "benefits" people?
Deleted User wrote: » I think exposure to different cultures is very good. But to be honest, I can't say I've really studied, say, Shinto enough to say "oh that'd be good for her".
[Deleted User] wrote: » Was Taoism the right answer so? I shouldda gone with Taoism. Not sure that Kavanagh had the same issues. He didn't like his childhood. I loved mine...I just think my daughter will be exposed to more cultures than I was, and I think that's good. Do you think that's "self flagellation"?
One eyed Jack wrote: » Omackerel asks you what religion if any is going to benefit her at all, and you answer him with a question that provides nothing in the way of an answer, instead inquiring as to whether he thinks Catholicism "benefits" people?
[Deleted User] wrote: » As I said, I grew up in a very Catholic country...do you think Catholicism "benefits" people? I think exposure to different cultures is very good. But to be honest, I can't say I've really studied, say, Shinto enough to say "oh that'd be good for her".
One eyed Jack wrote: » Conor I'm Catholic, but even that level of self-flagellation is beyond the pale.
Sleeper12 wrote: » No deflection. Racism can't be evilution or even natural selection. It's not natural instinct to be racist. Racism is a learned behaviour. A child will be mean to another child. He will call him blacky if he's black and fatty if he's fat
Omackeral wrote: » OP just wondering if you could get back to this question.
Deleted User wrote: » But it was a bit of a non sequitor. Do you think the Irish going to other countries is a really bad thing for the natives because of the Guildford and Birmingham pub bombings? So no one can possibly say that the Irish influence was beneficial?
Omackeral wrote: » Conor you said your daughter will grow up in a better climate than you did as she'll be exposed to more customs and religions. Which religions, if any, are gonna benefit her at all?
marcus001 wrote: » There are some things which aren't legally enforceable but are happily part of our culture, like treating your daughter as equal to your son. Just because someone follows the law does not mean they are a good person or an asset to society.
One eyed Jack wrote: » You don't appear to appreciate Irish laws yourself there HP, they're too slow to catch up to your views, but they're too liberal for your views in other areas. Yet you object to people who do not share your views even though they are law abiding citizens of our country? Sounds like a severe case of double standards.
Sweetemotion wrote: Deflect, deflect, deflect.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » I'd rather wait until after the referendum before I agree that it's "part of our social values", I believe that Ireland has advanced and that our laws are simply slow to catch up. Regardless, your question is a little odd - I have no issue with people going to other jurisdictions if they don't like Irish laws or social customs, and I'd have no problem with an ultraconservative muslim family going to Saudi Arabia if they want to raise their daughter without any personal freedom. I just don't think they should be allowed to do it in this country. If you're in Ireland and you raise your daughter to believe that she has no agency, you are in my view committing child abuse, plain and simple.
99nsr125 wrote: » It's not discriminatory it's the truth
[Deleted User] wrote: » You do realise that's a very discriminatory remark?