jobbridge4life wrote: » As have I, but that is my point, she treats his publically professed sexist tripe as a joke, as a 'shur we know what you are really like' situation. It isn't good enough, it isn't consistent with her attitude to sexism generally. I also don't accept that having a few women on now and again discludes the possibility of him being a sexist, or regularly trotting out sexist drivel. I like Dr Kelly, but she lets George away with things that she ought not to. The vaccination stuff being the most crucial. She spends her days tweeting against anti-vaxxers, only in the last few days she was demanding the resignation of Finian McGrath, she rightfully views it as a life and death matter. Yet she will turn up on George's show and happily laugh at his inane medical remarks?
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » I have heard her remind George, numerous times on air, to stop his bluster because she knows him off-mic, and he is genuinely supportive of women in the workplace. This has an air of credibility about it. Despite all his potentially pejorative language about 'broads' and 'dames', George seems genuinely willing to promote women on air with slots like 'Here Come the Girls' on a Friday, where the panel discuss contemporary issues and current affairs. Now, whatever you think of the contributors, and I'm not always a fan, that is not the behaviour of some profuse sexist. We sometimes forget that these presenters know one another off-air, and I honestly don't think Dr Kelly would have such good chemistry with George were he not a promoter of women on air, which I believe he is. George Hook has many views that I find primitive, frankly; but I don't think it's fair at all to attribute sexism to him.
sligojoek wrote: » At 30c a pop
ThisRegard wrote: » I've said it many times before, compare him to how he was when he had his drive time show. I believe a lot of his bluster on his afternoon show is to generate texts and tweets and just to wind up people for the craic. And it works.
Chelsea Miniature Somehow wrote: » This idea that he's OK behind his public persona doesn't wash for me. (same idea trotted out for Mcgregor) If you trot out sexist, islamaphobic, anti vax, egotistical, etc. rhetoric all day it doesn't matter what you do off mic.
jobbridge4life wrote: » She ought to, but she won't. Much like she happily treats his sexism as a little nod and a wink joke, but then goes on like a proper feminist stalwart on Twitter.
Del.Monte wrote: » She pretty sexist herself as I recall a couple of weeks ago she said that she was getting "warm" during a discussion about George Clooney - ugh...
Don't Chute! wrote: » No no no, it's "Peter" Weller!
jooksavage wrote: » Will Ciara Kelly take Hook to task next time she's on? She's publicly dismissed the vaccine "debate" as "scaremongering" and she's available at the drop of hat for every media appointment. It would be a public service to shut down Hook's layman dithering about vaccinations once and for all.
sligojoek wrote: » Is George trying to tell us he never heard of The Jam or Paul Weller?
delaad wrote: » Such as he have been labelled "emotional terrorists" on this issue in this mornings papers,... hence his hysteria.
jobbridge4life wrote: » Now I am wondering which was the real George.
jooksavage wrote: » Only a few months ago the president of the IMO voiced concern over a serious drop in uptake of the HPV vaccine and went as far as citing ill-informed media as one of the reasons. Whether your like him or think he's an idiot, what Hook is doing here is highly irresponsible.
bot43 wrote: » That would be regular shtick for George alright, pretending not to know anything at all about pop culture. I flicked in briefly but switched as soon as I realised it was him. I used be a big fan of his shows, but the more he turned into a caricature of himself the less I listened. Now I cannot bear his voice.