foxtrot101 wrote: » He does come very from humble working class roots. Albert Road, used to known as Jew Town. His mother persuaded the Head of Pres to let her pay them the fees in installments. He would of been from the poorest background in the school.
Harry Angstrom wrote: » There were far worse places to come from than Albert Road.
foxtrot101 wrote: » Maybe there was, but that doesn't mean he didn't come from a humble background - because he most certainly did.
Harry Angstrom wrote: » Everything is relative. Hook would have us think his background was of Angela's Ashes proportions. It most certainly wasn't.
Vorenus400 wrote: » Hook recently said he was poor compared to his school friends because they bought records and he didnt. His idea of poverty is relative to those he used to associate with. His stories of washing in a metal tub in the living room was very common id imagine. Jesus there was a lot of houses in the west that didnt have the water connected up to the late 80s. They had the electric connected though. I always take georges stories with a pinch of salt, he has never done the walking to school shoeless uphill both ways:D
foxtrot101 wrote: » Look, you were wrong in your original assertion and now you just don't want to admit it. That's up to you, but I'm not going to get into a big circular argument over it.
Harry Angstrom wrote: » What??
Harry Angstrom wrote: » What?? I couldn't be arsed having an argument over George Hook of all people. Go and get some fresh air for yourself or something.
southstar wrote: » So don't start a bloody argument then!
PeterTheNinth wrote: » My god I'm sick of Newstalk and their "equality" agenda... Some wan on now asking why women aren't bricklayers. Did she actually ask any women if they wanted to become bricklayers?? Such absolutely bullsh1t.
Mancomb Seepgood wrote: » A look at Newstalk's weekday lineup should make any notion that they are advancing some kind of equality agenda laughable.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » That's right. One of Pat Kenny's guests pointed out yesterday that Newstalk shouldn't be free from criticisms over gender representation, saying that you have to wait until 4pm in the weekday evening to hear the first female voice (co)/hosting a show. And even then, Sarah McInerney is the last female host for the rest of the day. One female presenter during weekdays? This is an "equality agenda"?
kneemos wrote: » The women they have are rubbish presenters.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » And the men? If Newstalk didn't have a male host until (say) Paul Williams at 4pm, I doubt many people would be silent on it, or saying 'ah the men are all rubbish anyway'. People would be raving about the unfairness of it all. But even mention the lack of women and it's instantly dismissed as something along the lines of 'sure they don't want these (high profile, well paid) jobs'.
kneemos wrote: » Kenny,Coleman,Moncrieff are all excellent,even Hook can do a good interview.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » If Newstalk didn't have a male host until (say) Paul Williams at 4pm, I doubt many people would be silent on it, or saying 'ah the men are all rubbish anyway'.
nuac wrote: » Are the male presenters any better?
PeterTheNinth wrote: » I think they are doing a good enough job try to burn the station to the ground (with the current lineups) without trying an all female lineup.
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Why would it be harmful to replace the male presenters with females, and vice versa?