bangkok wrote: » He plays more forward passes and his average pass distance is higher than matic
Mitch Connor wrote: » I find it insane Carrick's passing is being questioned. I would have thought his passing would be an attribute no one disagreed on, that he is/was a great passer. Maybe not Pirlo or Scholes, but you don't have to be at their level to be a great passer. If Carrick wasn't a great passer, imo, he'd have had little place in the United side imo.
jayo26 wrote: » As ye all told me yesterday stats don't mean anything. When I pointed out that Matic was creating and assisting with his passes it didn't matter what he did with them. His pass length was point one of a meter longer then Matic.
jayo26 wrote: » I dont think anyone is questioning him and I'm definitely not I just said that Matic was a better passer in my opinion.
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » Keane was a far superior passer of the ball then any United player of PL era other then Scholes. Keane "right pass" all the time was exceptionally high.
Kerrydude1981 wrote: » Happy with the Matic signing,he should be a good solid addition to the team and squadBeen watching clips of this Aurier lad,he looks like an all action RB.
Giggsy11 wrote: » Beckham's passing ability is very underrated. What a crisp passer he was, both short and long, from center or wide.
bangkok wrote: » Would like to see fosu mensah play cup games and a few league games at rb to cover valencia with a view for him to be our rb for the next 10 years
bangkok wrote: » Ah dont think it was now, becks was world class, probably the best crosser of a ball in the history of the game with passing to match
beno619 wrote: » How has he performed during pre season ? He utterly underwhelmed me last season and just doesn't look a wide player.
bangkok wrote: » I agree with you by the way. Every pass keane made was the right one, xavi the same but yet some use carricks short game as a stick to beat him with
adox wrote: » Hi is all pace power an muscle but his ball control and decision making still lets him down. Hes like a poor version of Valencia at the moment when playing RB. I dont think hes anywhere near ready to fill that role on a regular basis.
The_Kew_Tour wrote: » hmm you got me thinking now about having Keane ahead of him. I can sure now see argument for him being ahead. I should have been clear in my comment when I suggested more CM positions then out wide, but ya Beckham could pick out a 2p coin from across the field. Nobody could ever touch him for a long pass, cross or freekick.
Adamocovic wrote: » While we're talking about Becks why not take a trip down memory lane. We should have a dedicated day for nostalgic videos and pictures of former players, matches and moments.
Mitch Connor wrote: » I just don't think he will ever be a right back. Centre back, maybe DM, can't see another role for him - either at United or elsewhere. Getting played at right back because he has (a) played in defence and is (b) right footed. I don't see any other main reasons for it.
beno619 wrote: » yes at times he could have been more direct but there's no question his ability to pick out a man when he tries to.
bucketybuck wrote: » I've seen a few people say now that they thought Mikhitaryan was good in the second half of last season, am I the only one that thinks the opposite? He had a good spell when he finally broke into the team but I was very disappointed with him as the season went on, at a time when we could have done with big performances I thought he was very ineffective. Similar to Mata in many ways, looked good at times but never a player that was going to drag the team kicking and screaming to victories. I gave him a pass last season, time to settle and all that, but that excuse is gone now and he really needs to step up or ship out.
bangkok wrote: » Xavi and Pirlo are probably 2 of the best passers of all time. Carrick was a bit below their level but was still a class act and one was still one of the best passers in europe and probably the best in england for a few years. Matic was never and will never be anywhere near as good as carrick was
TheDoc wrote: » That is a gross exaggeration of Carricks ability to be honest. He is starting to get to Scholes level of inflation. I don't understand why it is fans just spin myths and overblow a players ability as they come to the end of their career. Carrick had a wonderful instinct of looking to pass forward first, but his passing was above average, but nowhere near special. He recycled as much as anyone else, and every now and then would hit a lovely long range pass setting someone in on goal or down a flank. Personally, I've seen Blind be more productive and talented with his passing during his brief stint at DM, at CB and LB. It's why I just don't get why I'm constantly alone calling for Blind to figure more, he's just a better player then Carrick at the time the pair have been teammates, but then if people have that sort of mythical opinion on Carrick there really is no debate.