Mitch Connor wrote: » Just came to mind when I saw the contract.... Financially, in terms of accounting, a player price is spread over the length of their contract (options not included, iirc). So at 35million matic is 11.6 or something like that per season. From an accountancy perspective, we could have signed Dier at 55million on a five year contract for what would be considered the same money. I'm not saying its that simple in reality, or we shouldn't have signed Matic, or that we could have even got Dier for 55 - but just something I found briefly interesting when looking at the (quite reasonable in todays market) 35million, and then saw it was a 3 year contract.
jayo26 wrote: » Probably our most important signing of the summer just been announced so lets just nit pick at each other's arguments for two two game bans. To put it into perspective you would get 3 games for delibrety elbowing a player or other violent conduct.
TheDoc wrote: » Don't know if you are an accountant by trade or were reading some of the same stuff as me lately I got lost in a web of papers on how footballers are now assets with associated revenues, and their wages being filed as operating expenses and just basically how all that is reported. Was pretty interesting but also pretty ridiculously complicated, but I imagine it's done that way to twist figures to the public or something or there might be some form of loopholes.
Giggsy11 wrote: » 35 million plus 5 million in addons is a good deal. We have very good midfield now.
Deleted User wrote: » I dont know though like, could you imagine usain bolt being pulled in straight after he won an olympic gold medal to do a drugs test instead of getting to do a few laps of honour there would be uproar about it. I'm not sure of the timeline of events but players should be given time to enjoy winning a cup win. If it happened after a reasonable amount of time mind its silly. Its silly anyways I guess but I could understand if they werent given reasonable time
jayo26 wrote: » By the way Mitch it's an initial 3 year contract so I'm guessing its like most of the other contracts we signed recently and we have the option of an extra year which would make it four years. I think it's a very good deal all round the bit of transfer talks with Chelsea have got the price down for him.
fatherted1969 wrote: » To be fair to Mourinho his signings so far have been spot on so I'm sure he knows the strengths that Matic brings to his team. Starting to look very much like a Mourinho side now. Won't be seeing Matic go past the half way line much I'd imagine
JamboMac wrote: » How many more players will be banned for the super cup, how come we can't do a Madrid/Barcelona job and ignore the rules, all this is very convenient for Madrid. Only Phil jones could get banned without playing.
jayo26 wrote: » Love transfer news
pjohnson wrote: » I thought we used Upton/Riley. Whos that?
HONKEY TONK wrote: » Anyone know how good Serge Aurier is? I know nothing about him