Burial. wrote: » Why are ye even wasting your time lads...spare your sanity.
Sweet Science wrote: » I have the strongest piece of evidence that is possible . He is not a boxer . Im better than Rory McIlroy at golf . Prove me wrong you have nothing to back it up with
wonderfullife wrote: » Floyd gets hit (by boxers) a lot more than people on this thread are making out, though. He's not some elusive ghost. Every opponent he has ever faced has landed on him frequently. He just makes it look like nothing because he's rolling away from the blows.
Sweet Science wrote: » But i've seen McGregor box in sparring , seen him box a heavy bag , seen him box in MMA , note his amateur pedigree in Dublin , can see how bad his footwork is , can see his speed isnt great, can see he has a very bad jab, can see he will be boxing for his 1st time ever, can see he fighting an all time great pro boxer. I have all the evidence i need to make a very solid prediction that in the pro boxing game he is not at all good.
walshb wrote: » Yes, but he is getting hit by experienced boxers. Conor is not close to this. So, I think it's logical to assume/think that Floyd may have an easier time not getting hit by Conor. OR, maybe Floyd won't care that Conor can or will land, as Conor is not a man who he believes has the combined elements of technique and speed and delivery and power to really bother him. In other words, Conor being so not a boxer means Floyd doesn't give a fook if maybe Conor lands. I would not be surprised to see Floyd playing with Conor and allowing Conor bits of success here and there to make out that this is a real affair. Just in case you wet your pants, that is me saying that Floyd does this all by himself. Nothing to do with a staged agreement. The gulf in class is so much that it really is cat and mouse stuff...
Gamebred wrote: » There is video footage of him sparring a professional boxer, I think that alone gives people evidence enough to form an opinion of some sort.
wonderfullife wrote: » I think Conor will annoy him so much in the build-up that Floyd will want to go in there and want to rip his head off. Conor will probably bring his domestic violence history into it, his kids into it, etc.
walshb wrote: » And there goes your 9 rds prediction for Conor!
wonderfullife wrote: » Dangerous road to go down to judge people on training footage. Conor has looked muck against Artem in sparring in the past.
wonderfullife wrote: » That's not evidence.Paul McGrath and Ledley King barely trained in soccer because their knees were so bad but they were still beasts come match-day. You're just making an informed guess and you might be very right or you might be very wrong. We will all have evidence August 26th and then we can give much better opinions. From purely MMA terms, Conor's jab is not good. His footwork and movement are exceptional. His hand-speed is average. His accuracy is amazing. Let's see what he brings to the ring. The key concern is the lack of a jab given how important that is in boxing.
wonderfullife wrote: » To be clear my initial prediction was Floyd to win via 9th round TKO (not Conor to win). But I'm open minded enough to change my pick if I see any encouraging reasons to do so.
wonderfullife wrote: » That's not evidence. Paul McGrath and Ledley King barely trained in soccer because their knees were so bad but they were still beasts come match-day. You're just making an informed guess and you might be very right or you might be very wrong. We will all have evidence August 26th and then we can give much better opinions. From purely MMA terms, Conor's jab is not good. His footwork and movement are exceptional. His hand-speed is average. His accuracy is amazing. Let's see what he brings to the ring. The key concern is the lack of a jab given how important that is in boxing.
wonderfullife wrote: » How do you know that Conor doesn't? You've zero idea how much boxing ability Conor has and neither do I. Until we see him in a boxing ring in an actual match, we can only speculate. All his sparring partners are saying he's an extremely good boxer. They're all getting paid so I'll take their reviews with a pinch of salt but the one guy not being paid is Conor Wallace because he's not in the camp and he is saying the same thing. I suppose even with him, he might be hoping for future call-ups to the camp for Diaz 3. For all we know he turns up on fight night with an improved jab, crisp counters, good footwork, precise combinations and makes a fight of it.
wonderfullife wrote: » There's nothing Conor can do in the ring to earn the respect of old-school boxing fans. He could piece Floyd up for 12 rounds and win a 118-110 decision and people still wouldn't show him respect.
walshb wrote: » I would not be surprised to see Floyd playing with Conor and allowing Conor bits of success here and there to make out that this is a real affair.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Let's hope so............
Sweet Science wrote: » Are you and Wonderforlife the same person ? Can you imagine a boxer throwing a punch like your man its embarrassing to look at
Outlaw Pete wrote: » The point is that if Mayweather "allows Conor bits of success" he is liable to regret it given that sweet left of McGregor's.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » You're missing the point....... Of course Mayweather is in a different league to Ivan Buchinger... wasn't trying to compare the two of them... and mma gloves are being used here, so much less force transfer. The point is that if Mayweather "allows Conor bits of success" he is liable to regret it given that sweet left of McGregor's.
walshb wrote: » No, he is not liable.....nonsense to think he will regret it.
What does success mean to you? That Floyd sticks his chin out and say away you go, Conor hit me full on as hard as you can?
And by the way, Floyd still beats Conor with one arm/hand in a boxing ring!
Sweet Science wrote: » I dont think he will allow him any success. Nobody likes being punched
Outlaw Pete wrote: » I honestly think at this stage you are confusing Floyd Mayweather with Mike Tyson.... as nothing else could excuse saying such idiocy.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » you're in lala land if you think just because Floyd is an excellent boxer (maybe the best p4p ever, defensively anyway) then that therefore makes him immune to being affected by Conor's punches.
walshb wrote: » Funny how nobody else thinks like you on this.......Nobody that I am aware of
Floyd with the left hand, where he can jab and hook and uppercut would still break Conor down...And he'd still have way too much movement and skills and defense for Conor.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » What are you on about..... I'd say millions of people would agree that Floyd allowed Conor 'success' might not work out to well for him. You're the one saying stuff that you'd only likely read in the comment section of YouTube vid. You're deluded. How the hell could Floyd defend against body and head punches with one hand........ Conor would annihilate him if Floyd could only use one arm ffs. I can't believe I'm having this conversation. You seem to think boxers have some kind of superpower.
walshb wrote: » Who said Floyd would be immune to Conor's shots?
Outlaw Pete wrote: » What are you on about..... I'd say millions of people would agree that Floyd allowed Conor 'success' might not work out to well for him. You're the one saying stuff that you'd only likely read in the comment section of YouTube vid.