Fight Time From 4am-McGregor vs MayweatherMOD Warning in 1st Post

Joeseph Balls wrote: »

Great stance and right guard....

What do you want him to do? Re-invent himself as a traditional southpaw boxer?

He's going to do what he knows best (for better or worse) - wide karate stance and carrying his hands low.

We'll see how far that takes him.

Joeseph Balls

wonderfullife wrote: »

What do you want him to do? Re-invent himself as a traditional southpaw boxer?

He's going to do what he knows best (for better or worse) - wide karate stance and carrying his hands low.

We'll see how far that takes him.

What I want him to do is show up and do well. Will you settle a bit, you're that wrapped up in fanboism, that you take offense to anyone saying a bad word about him.

Burial.

I want him to get seven shades of ****e battered out of him. Do all the feng shui hippy Ido Portal nonsense for all I care.

Joeseph Balls wrote: »

What I want him to do is show up and do well. Will you settle a bit, you're that wrapped up in fanboism, that you take offense to anyone saying a bad word about him.

You don't have to scream "fanboy" anytime someone challenges you on your snarky posts.

I asked what do you want him to do in all seriousness. If you were his head coach here what would your plan be? Carrying a high guard has never been his thing and he very rarely shells up either. Nearly all of his KO's and TKO's have been punches thrown from the hip or counters after slipping punches with no guard.

Do you think Conor has enough time to practice fighting with a high guard?

To this day, Floyd maintains Emanuel Augustus was one of his toughest opponents. He was very similar to Conor in the sense he didn't move like a pro boxer, he didn't defend like a pro boxer and he gave zero fooks.

Fair enough Floyd still stopped him in the 9th but Augustus landed plenty early on while Floyd was figuring out his goofy awkward movements.

My point is this - Conor isn't a boxer. If he tries to become a boxer (fighting in a traditional stance and traditional guard) then he will just add his name to the other 49 boxers Floyd has beaten. His shot at victory (however small) is by doing things none of the others have done. A karate stance and carrying his hands low would certainly be something Floyd hasn't seen before :pac:

StringerBell

Just because it is unusual doesn't mean it is of any use.

I dunno why people bother arguing this, in a boxing match this is over whenever Floyd wants to go home. It is that simple.

He is old, he is slower, his offensive output is poor, he is still going to slap the head off McGregor and any of the pre fight hype to sell tickets will be done away with once the bell rings, the gulf in class will be apparent.

Would it be sweet to see Mayweather sparked out in the middle of the ring? Oh hell yes, but lets not give this bout any more credibility then it deserves, its a money making excercise that all involved are doing very well out of. Fair play to them, but lets no try to kid anybody with regard to what this is.

CatFromHue

StringerBell wrote: »

Just because it is unusual doesn't mean it is of any use.

I agree.

An example put forth on this thread was how Italy played against England in this years 6 Nations, they didn't contest the ruck which is pretty strange but makes no offside line.

They still lost by 21 points!

noc1980

James Toney's reaction to being asked about Conor's boxing coach saying he would knock Floyd out... "He doesn't have a boxing coach"

100m payday and you've got MMA coaches and Irish amateurs to spar with in preparation for battle against our generation's greatest boxer.

Imagine Roger Mayweather coaching Floyd wrestling for an MMA bout. C'mon!

Too Tough To Die

wonderfullife wrote: »

You don't have to scream "fanboy" anytime someone challenges you on your snarky posts.

I asked what do you want him to do in all seriousness. If you were his head coach here what would your plan be? Carrying a high guard has never been his thing and he very rarely shells up either. Nearly all of his KO's and TKO's have been punches thrown from the hip or counters after slipping punches with no guard.

Do you think Conor has enough time to practice fighting with a high guard?

To this day, Floyd maintains Emanuel Augustus was one of his toughest opponents. He was very similar to Conor in the sense he didn't move like a pro boxer, he didn't defend like a pro boxer and he gave zero fooks.

But one key difference between Conor and Augustus is that Augustus had a tonne of boxing ability.

Genuinely is he comes in messing with a karate stances etc in a boxing bout i will knock it off immediately

Its already a farce as it is dont make it worse.

Come in , box properly, lose , cash your cheque, go home happy .

AlmightyCushion

CatFromHue wrote: »

I agree.

An example put forth on this thread was how Italy played against England in this years 6 Nations, they didn't contest the ruck which is pretty strange but makes no offside line.

They still lost by 21 points!

The strategy still worked for them and it was useful. England wanted to absolutely batter Italy and build up a huge try/points difference. Everyone expected England to absolutely batter the shít out of Italy. We bet Italy by over 50 points. There was people saying that England would trounce them by more than that. If I remember correctly, the England game ended up being Italy's closest game of the tournament points wise and Italy were winning the game at half time. Italy made a game that should have been a one sided slaughtering into a somewhat competitive game at least for the first half or so. It was an embarrassment for England and Italy surprised a lot of people.

There are a lot of similarities here to the Mayweather McGregor fight i.e. everyone expects Mayweather to make a fool of McGregor and for it to be a completely one sided fight where McGregor hasn't a chance. Imagine if the same happens in this fight as happened when Italy played England. If Conor loses but still manages to win a few early rounds, lands some big shots and makes it look competitive if even only for a while then he will surprise and impress a lot of people. Sure, it's still a loss but he would have done far better than most people ever expected him to.

This is why there are the comparisons with Italy. Their unusual tactics didn't get them the win but it made them do far better than everyone expected and they surprised and impressed a lot of people. If Conor can do the same (and I'm not saying he can) then I think it'll be a good result for him.

section4

Burial. wrote: »

Floyd doesn't get pissed off. There's rarely a more calm fighter in the ring than Floyd. Conor isn't a unique snowflake that'll change that. Floyd's very calculated, there's no reason for him to end the show in round 1. A prolonged beating where he lands every punch he throws over a few rounds before stopping him would be far more impressive. If he landed a beaut in the first that ended the fight you'd have clowns saying it's a fluke punch and calling for a rematch.

I think that is the main point, flood mayweather never took chances even when he was younger and with an older head he certainly not going to take them now .
He will just box and when he thinks it time , then and only then will he take a chance.

It's basically a skip Lorry driver against a formula one driver

section4

AlmightyCushion wrote: »

The strategy still worked for them and it was useful. England wanted to absolutely batter Italy and build up a huge try/points difference. Everyone expected England to absolutely batter the shít out of Italy. We bet Italy by over 50 points. There was people saying that England would trounce them by more than that. If I remember correctly, the England game ended up being Italy's closest game of the tournament points wise and Italy were winning the game at half time. Italy made a game that should have been a one sided slaughtering into a somewhat competitive game at least for the first half or so. It was an embarrassment for England and Italy surprised a lot of people.

There are a lot of similarities here to the Mayweather McGregor fight i.e. everyone expects Mayweather to make a fool of McGregor and for it to be a completely one sided fight where McGregor hasn't a chance. Imagine if the same happens in this fight as happened when Italy played England. If Conor loses but still manages to win a few early rounds, lands some big shots and makes it look competitive if even only for a while then he will surprise and impress a lot of people. Sure, it's still a loss but he would have done far better than most people ever expected him to.

This is why there are the comparisons with Italy. Their unusual tactics didn't get them the win but it made them do far better than everyone expected and they surprised and impressed a lot of people. If Conor can do the same (and I'm not saying he can) then I think it'll be a good result for him.

The problem with that theory is that both teams have been practising the same sport for years but sometimes different tactics
Mayweather and mcgregir have been practising different sports for years
Tactics won't make any difference here

CatFromHue wrote: »

I agree.

An example put forth on this thread was how Italy played against England in this years 6 Nations, they didn't contest the ruck which is pretty strange but makes no offside line.

They still lost by 21 points!

Isn't the argument more - "How much would they have lost by without doing their offside trick?".

Wasn't Haskell and Dylan Hartley scratching their heads and looking for the ref to explain to them what the story was?

I.e. If Conor can come up with a set of tactics that would disrupt the rhythm of the fight and throw Floyd off his normal game even for 4 rounds, it'd be pretty beneficial to him - even if he ultimately loses.

This thread will be some craic if Conor lands a left hand counter and Floyd does the chicken dance before being TKO'd.

wonderfullife wrote: »

.

This thread will be some craic if Conor lands a left hand counter and Floyd does the chicken dance before being TKO'd.

Sure will

Let's say that happens.

What exactly does it prove? He landed a KO shot on Floyd...

I'd still back so many boxers to obliterate Conor in a boxing match....

He won't suddenly become a respected boxer...

Too Tough To Die wrote: »

But one key difference between Conor and Augustus is that Augustus had a tonne of boxing ability.

How do you know that Conor doesn't? You've zero idea how much boxing ability Conor has and neither do I. Until we see him in a boxing ring in an actual match, we can only speculate.

All his sparring partners are saying he's an extremely good boxer.

They're all getting paid so I'll take their reviews with a pinch of salt but the one guy not being paid is Conor Wallace because he's not in the camp and he is saying the same thing. I suppose even with him, he might be hoping for future call-ups to the camp for Diaz 3.

For all we know he turns up on fight night with an improved jab, crisp counters, good footwork, precise combinations and makes a fight of it.

walshb wrote: »

Sure will

Let's say that happens.

What exactly does it prove? He landed a KO shot on Floyd...

I'd still back so many boxers to obliterate Conor in a boxing match....

He won't suddenly become a respected boxer...

It would prove everyone saying Conor has 0% chance and will land 0 punches were just wrong.

There's nothing Conor can do in the ring to earn the respect of old-school boxing fans. He could piece Floyd up for 12 rounds and win a 118-110 decision and people still wouldn't show him respect.

wonderfullife wrote: »

How do you know that Conor doesn't? You've zero idea how much boxing ability Conor has and neither do I. Until we see him in a boxing ring in an actual match, we can only speculate.

All his sparring partners are saying he's an extremely good boxer.

They're all getting paid so I'll take their reviews with a pinch of salt but the one guy not being paid is Conor Wallace because he's not in the camp and he is saying the same thing. I suppose even with him, he might be hoping for future call-ups to the camp for Diaz 3.

For all we know he turns up on fight night with an improved jab, crisp counters, good footwork, precise combinations and makes a fight of it.

Yes i do

This isnt make belief . This is the real world . There is no tooth fairy or Santa Claus . Its perfectly logical to assume an amateur boxers ability is very poor in relation to an all time great pro boxer.

wonderfullife wrote: »

There's nothing Conor can do in the ring to earn the respect of old-school boxing fans. He could piece Floyd up for 12 rounds and win a 118-110 decision and people still wouldn't show him respect.

What?

So, Conor steps in the ring and beats Floyd 118-110 and no respect?

That would be far more far fetched than the KO, but surely it would garner respect....

Sweet Science wrote: »

This isnt make belief . This is the real world . There is no tooth fairy or Santa Claus . Its perfectly logical to assume an amateur boxers ability is very poor in relation to an all time great pro boxer.

But Conor is not even an amateur boxer in the sens of a competing amateur boxer. He is not any type of boxer...

weldoninhio

CatFromHue wrote: »

I agree.

An example put forth on this thread was how Italy played against England in this years 6 Nations, they didn't contest the ruck which is pretty strange but makes no offside line.

They still lost by 21 points!

I'd have to say I agree too. Boxing is not a new sport, its been around years. You can look back to the matches from the 20's etc onward and see how it evolved. If a different stance( i.e. karate) worked better, it'd be the stance used by the majority. The reason most boxers use the standard stance is because that is the one that has evolved to be the most effective, offensively and defensively.

Sweet Science wrote: »

Yes i do

No you don't.

All you have are assumptions, no evidence.

walshb wrote: »

What?

So, Conor steps in the ring and beats Floyd 118-110 and no respect?

That would be far more far fetched than the KO, but surely it would garner respect....

Ok so to get your respect as a boxer he needs to beat Floyd on points?

Burial.

Why are ye even wasting your time lads...spare your sanity.

maximoose

wonderfullife wrote: »

Ok so to get your respect as a boxer he needs to beat Floyd on points?

How many times across how many threads are you two going to have the same argument. Over and over and over again, it's getting painful.

wonderfullife wrote: »

No you don't.

All you have are assumptions, no evidence.

Ok so to get your respect as a boxer he needs to beat Floyd on points?

If he KOs or beats Floyd in any legal manner he would get respect.

Same if Floyd stepped into the Octagon and beat Conor.

Burial. wrote: »

Why are ye even wasting your time lads...spare your sanity.

Nobody is forcing anyone here to debate/discuss. If it's not your cup of tea.........?

maximoose wrote: »

How many times across how many threads are you two going to have the same argument. Over and over and over again, it's getting painful.

Maybe it doesn't read too well sorry

I'd be interested in the reverse discussion too - what would Floyd have to do in an Octagon to earn my respect in that field. I'm thinking if he defended a few takedown attempts or checked a few leg kicks, I would think "wow he did far better than I thought from limited training".

wonderfullife wrote: »

No you don't.

All you have are assumptions, no evidence.

Ok so to get your respect as a boxer he needs to beat Floyd on points?

I have the strongest piece of evidence that is possible . He is not a boxer . Im better than Rory McIlroy at golf . Prove me wrong you have nothing to back it up with