ACLFC7 wrote: » Isn't the scheduled date just for the first connections. They'd only have to pass one house to meet their goal.
damienirel wrote: » Wow you're only seeing action now? It was scheduled to be finished in Patrickswell by Q2 '17 - they have another day to meet that deadline - LOL.
snowstreams wrote: » Eir did advertise near me about a month before going live. But some disgruntled person went around crumpling up all the eir advertisements! Funnily enough the Imagine adverts were untouched.
oleras wrote: » Lots of activity down my road the last 2 weeks. Down the church road, outside Patrickswell. Proper manholes have been fitted every couple of hundred meters and they started to mark the poles also.
plodder wrote: » I see Imagine are advertising around our area, obviously trying to sign people up before the fibre arrives. I wonder why Open/eir don't advertise in the same way...
snowstreams wrote: » I finally got connected yesterday with the 150mb package. It was pretty good at first, I was getting 144mb/s and a 6ms latency but this morning the wifi signal keeps dropping! So this is why I heard the F2000 is a bad modem. I've about 20m of cat5e cable going from the ONT downstairs to the modem upstairs. Is 6ms a reasonable ping to expect over a wired connection, or could my cat5e cable going upstairs be dodgy?
Aspiring wrote: » If a package is X for the first 12 months, and Y for the remaining 6 months on an 18 month contract, after these 18 months you continue to pay the higher Y price every month for the next 18 months, is that correct?
Gwynston wrote: » I sent openeir my eircode and they replied "the current forecast date suggests that your area should be connected to the fibre network by the end of September 2017". So not quite the news I was hoping for, but at least may area is still on their radar and they will hopefully get around to finishing the remainder of Claregalway.
MunsterCycling wrote: » MikroTik was easy enough to setup, just add a VLAN 10 and attach it to the gateway inferface + DHCP client on the VLAN 10. With regards to fixed IP on FTTC, would setting the VLAN with the static IP not be the solution, I have my MikroTik on my second internet connection and that uses static and that is how I did it, albeit on the eth0 rather than VLAN 10 interface... The Tik didn't do as good as the EdgeRouter X SFP on WAN speeds though not far off but about 3-8 Mbits less, mine is a Gigabit WAN Tik so it isn't an issue there. Let us know here or in PM how you got on with the static on FTTC
The Cush wrote: » eir are launching their VoBB service in the coming months so no need for a copper connection - http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057709177&page=2. A 32 or 37mm thick walled polyethylene or 50mm PVC is recommended for the duct
pg17 wrote: » With FTTH, does eir provide VOIP as an alternative to the traditional phone on landline copper? I envisage installing a duct from the pole at the roadside to the outside of the building and continuing the duct to the planned position for the ODP, ONT and F2000 router and RJ11 outlets in the services room – a single duct would carry the fibre and traditional copper (2 pairs) – what is the minimum bend radius for the duct/fibre. What is a typical diameter for such a duct ?
ED E wrote: » Copy pasting posts is frowned upon on boards.
9726_9726 wrote: » Cool. Let us know how you get on. Mikrotik would be the one I'd be interested in. Is it the same as FTTC where you just use vlan-id=10 and DHCP client? On FTTC this works for dynamic IP but not static.
plodder wrote: » I don't think that would apply to existing installations. My 60+ year old house doesn't have one, and I presume they don't expect me to install one.