Lukker- wrote: » I'd imagine it's written into Conor's contract on the UFC's end. They are granting him temporary release so they can get certain guarantees on Conor's end.
EagererBeaver wrote: » Basically if you approach this with mindset of "this is not a UFC promotion" you can't go wrong. They'll take their cut and that's it. Dana said there'll be an Embedded series for it but I'll believe it when I see it.
EagererBeaver wrote: » Fair enough. I'll still believe it when I see it.
EagererBeaver wrote: » If Showtime are the only broadcaster, given what they'll be paying for it, I imagine they'll want exclusive rights for All Access or similar.
cloudatlas wrote: » She gave them both a decent chance of winning, she didn't come out on either side. “I do think the longer the fight goes – I mean that's Mayweather's style – the longer the fight goes he really gets people's timing and really starts to pick them apart,” continued Holm. “If McGregor wins, it will be in the early rounds. If it goes longer, it goes to Mayweather. Anything can happen in that fight.”- Holly Holm
wonderfullife wrote: » Never underestimate how the general public/casual fans perceive belts.
Whelo79 wrote: » I'll enjoy the build up, enjoy studying how Conor and his team prepare, all the fight content released in advance, the walkouts, the nervous anticipation, the Buffers doing the fighter introductions, the first exchange and yeah maybe I'll be left underwhelmed by the actual fight, but I'm aware of this well in advance. However, there is always 'what if'. I'd hate to wake up the next morning to find out there was a shock result or even just a loss for Conor but there was a flash knockdown or a surprisingly competitive 3, 4, or 5 rounds before Floyd puts Conor away. I'd hate to be trying to watch it live on a dodgy stream. What's it likely to cost, €20, €30, €40? Not much between some friends. It's worth it even just for the excuse to stay up and have a few beers like a lot of UFC events.
Gamebred wrote: » you're a hater if your saying Conor has no chance.
Effects wrote: » How does this happen when the two words are so close together?
Fromvert wrote: » Schaub's already got on with Showtime to do some pieces with him 'breaking it down' so he's going to keep driving the McGregor train full steam.
walshb wrote: » Any good ideas for the tag for this match? I was thinking someone's 0 has got to go, but that's been done to death... so, what about The Con is on?
Lukker- wrote: » Money vs Money Jr
weldoninhio wrote: » Wealthy Vs Rich? Mayweather Vs Fairweather (i.e flavour of the month)? The Pinnacle Vs the Pinstripe?
Lukker- wrote: » Nouveau wealthy vs nouveau rich I wouldn't call Conor flavour of the month, he's been the biggest combat sports star going since MayPac
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Fromvert wrote: » I think you're crazy that you believe it's impossible a professional boxer in Mayweather can't KO McGregor with one shot. Even with a free shot! We're not talking about ANY professional boxer though.. nor indeed ANY mma fighter. We're specifically talking about the possibility of Mayweather being able to knock McGregor down with one punch for a standing count of ten... not happening. But I've reasoned why I think he wouldn't be able to do it.... what's your reasoning for thinking that he could?
Fromvert wrote: » I think you're crazy that you believe it's impossible a professional boxer in Mayweather can't KO McGregor with one shot. Even with a free shot!
walshb wrote: » Whether pro boxers hit harder with punches or not than MMA guys is irrelevant, as the main thing is that pro boxers are specifically trained to deliver strikes with their hands. Power is more than just taking a swing and landing. The likelihood is that in general the pro boxer will get the most out of his punches because he is trained specifically in the delivery systems for punching. Bad news for Conor really, but there is always a silver lining. Floyd is not the same punching animal that say a Thurman, Garcia or Canelo are...
yourdeadwright wrote: » Did you miss when he fought Diaz only half decent boxer he's ever fought and the straight right turned him into a panic wrestler just before he got choked...........
wonderfullife wrote: » You've put a lot of thought and effort into this, I think you're overly obsessing about this fight. Actually no I just think you've nothing better to do than troll the forum, derail threads and thank-whore anything negative to do with Conor.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Did you miss the rematch?
EagererBeaver wrote: » **** me, sensitive much?
wonderfullife wrote: » Look I've had it with you, Finglashoop, Weldoninho and the other trolls. You've got nearly 2,000 posts. You've now quoted ME or replied to ME over 700 times. Almost every single time to disagree with me and/or slag me off. Whenever I say something I know you agree with, you stay silent. Your replies have included over 400 curse words and constantly having a go. I'm tired of the constant negativity, sniping and frankly I've no idea why half of you even follow MMA as I've never actually seen any of you bring any positivity to anything. I sat down and asked some questions in that 'AMA' and numerous posters just went over there to derail the thread and slag me off. The man has better things to be doing with his time than reading that and frankly I'm done with this too.