end of the road wrote: » it shows nothing of the sort. this is nothing to do with sinn fein. sinn fein are still a very credible party and are the only ones who can now be trusted to run the country.
ToddyDoody wrote: » I have to say I'm happy with this result... Dragging down the good name of Sinn Fein with this type of behaviour is reprehensible IMHO.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Very rare that such a long sentence is applied to anything. Be real about it. Some life sentences amount to this. Although I know they are on "license" for life forever. This is not similar. Judges cannot be called out on their sentencing, except in the court of appeal. All very fine for you to say what you did, so my voice is mute, except for a rant on places like this really. What recourse does any joe or josie have really can you tell me.
Syphonax wrote: » Sinn Fein are a credible party but its a choice between blue collar and white collar crime and no one in their right mind wants the anarchy that would come with Sinn Fein in power.
bubblypop wrote: » Its exactly because its rare that we should be happy a real sentence has been applied. Im not sure why anyone would try to say otherwise? If people have a problem with other sentences being too lenient, then those are the sentences they need to complain about.this was a good sentence, you must remember he was a public representative engaged in torture
smurgen wrote: » Smashing a glass in someones face ala Sean Conlon (Fine Gael) is not white collar crime.
Spanish Eyes wrote: » Until it is appealed. At our expense. Remember other sentences for brutal crimes did not get 12 years or anything like it. And if you could advise how one could appeal a lenient sentence I am all ears. Only the accused can do this am I right? And I would be amazed if an accused would appeal a lenient sentence. So how do I as a law abiding citizen either complain against a tough or lenient sentence applied by the judge? I bet the families and loved ones of the perpetrators would really love to know this. It does not happen. Thanks for the heads up there anyway. FWIW
LordSutch wrote: » The good name of Sinn Fein I presume you're being sarcastic.
ToddyDoody wrote: » Would any shinner disagree?
Spanish Eyes wrote: » I have no time for SF or their hangers on at all. Will always have a whiff of cordite about them and just beyond criminality etc. for me. But anyway, I cannot help but think that 12 years is a long sentence, when you think of rapists and child abusers and the devil and all getting much softer sentences that many a thread here comments on WRT to the leniency of sentencing. Seems a long sentence by comparison to me. Just thinking out loud here.
FrancieBrady wrote: » All armies everywhere have their share of members who are there because they enjoy the thuggery that goes with the job. Speak to the military police or resident of a garrison town. The IRA were no different. This guy obviously wasn't able to leave it behind him unlike most of those who joined SF. He left or got thrown out of the party. Post conflict parties have these issues.
Allinall wrote: » Are SF an army now?
Your Face wrote: » Shinnerbots assemble!
FrancieBrady wrote: » No, the IRA were structured as one unless you wish to be pointlessly pedantic.
Allinall wrote: » I'm all for pedantics. What was the point of your post? You didn't explain.
FrancieBrady wrote: » My point was, why be surprised that a former member of an army who could find no place in a political party, would be involved in thuggery? Members of armies and former members do stuff like this all the time. What was your point?
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » Was he in the ira? He was in sinn fein.
FrancieBrady wrote: » He said he was.
ceegee wrote: » But he had a place in a political party. He was a serving SF councillor at the time this happened. Plus he's 40, what f**king war was he fighting in Dublin in the late 90s?
Wheeliebin30 wrote: » But the ira ceased to exist 20 years ago? What are you smoking man?
Syphonax wrote: » My opinion on Sinn Fein has softened in recent years to the point that ive actually considered voting for them (perhaps its just years of been dismayed with the other main parties) but this news of this waterboarding just goes to show their true colours and how they truly operate out of view of the cameras.