CatFromHue wrote: » No, it's completely different
sonofenoch wrote: » Only different in that they're sure he'll get beat this time rather than hope
sonofenoch wrote: » Can we have a show of hands, those of you saying he'll get destroyed by Mayweather ......how many had him getting beat against Alvarez and probably every other fight going back to Mendez (or further) ......I know this is somewhat different but it's also somewhat the same
HONKEY TONK wrote: » Floyd will decide how many seconds, minutes, rounds he wants the fight to last. He will also decide what type of punishment will be dished out to McGregor.
sonofenoch wrote: » At least that's a sure and a hope....honest if nothing else
Dtp1979 wrote: » Jesus Christ imagine what this thread would turn into on the weeks building up to this fight, or even if it was announced.
riffmongous wrote: » I'm not sure why I bother checking this thread anymore
wonderfullife wrote: » UFC veteran Chris Camozzi suggested Conor should try get as far as the 6th round and then head-kick his face off. Just because.
Paully D wrote: » Unfortunately would never happen because there'll be a clause in the contract which will state if he tries anything like that he will lose his purse and more. Could you imagine if the fight starts, they touch gloves and Conor pulls a capoeira kick on him. It would be amazing. :pac: If he didn't get his head taken off from it poor Floyd would probably dive through the ropes and out of the ring. :pac:
HattrickNZ wrote: » There are lots of things that say mcG will lose.logic.stats.different sports.experience.FM defence.mcG cardio (?)..... Whereas McG has a gud left.gud under pressure. So everthing says he will probs lose but Fook it.I hope he wins just for my entertainment value and the anything is possible Ness. On a side note.I would love to see mcG doing unorthodox movements in there but within the rules.I mean if he could somehow work it to his advantage and not break the rules do some sort of a tumble leading to some offence. ...I know I am probs dreaming but like the concept.
Ultimate Seduction wrote: » Not suggesting anything like this will happen, but that tumble attack made me laugh. Would a spinning backfist be illegal in boxing?
Burial. wrote: » How is it good for any sport if some loud mouth casual comes in and luck boxes his way to victory against one of the all time greats? Would it have been good if James Toney KO'd Randy those years ago? It would be tragic. Randy taught him a lesson, and rightly so. It's like the Olympic ping pong champion coming over and beating Roger Federer at Wimbledon. Absolutely embarrassing. If this fight materialises it's a huge embarrassment, and a truly dominant beat down is the only thing that will save a little face.
wonderfullife wrote: I can't remember who made the point (maybe Kenny Florian) but basically the one saving grace in this is that when Floyd does sign a deal, it's usually to fight soon.
wonderfullife wrote: Best guess would be they get the deal signed June 16th, announced for August 19th and bang were ready to go.
Ultimate Seduction wrote: » Why June 16th?? Chael said on the same thing that August is the worst month for viewers across any sport. You never see big PPVs in August, obviously Conor v Nate last year but other than that?
wonderfullife wrote: I'm just guessing the fight is so big they could put it on during the middle of a nuclear war and still sell over 3 million PPV's.
Ultimate Seduction wrote: » Would those figures be just USA or across the globe? I'm really interested to find out which broadcaster will have it in UK and Ireland.
The Ayatolla wrote: Like for Anthony Joshua fights and the like? I've never seen them published really?
wonderfullife wrote: » I'm just guessing the fight is so big they could put it on during the middle of a nuclear war and still sell over 3 million PPV's. You're right it was Chael.