patsy_mccabe wrote: » So anyway, another 3 posts. Is that right? :rolleyes:
Nekarsulm wrote: » That's not a vacuum pump though,that's a shaft driven impeller about 16 inches in width, with four vanes. Most vacuum pumps (8000 litre MEC is almost universal in agri) would take about 3 minutes to suck up 1300 gallons of slurry.
Jack the Stripper wrote: » You were always a dinger with the maths patsy.
patsy_mccabe wrote: » This setup with a hydraulic pump on the tractor and a motor on the implement is very inefficient when compared to a PTO shaft. You'd get a big drop in HP from the tractor to the implement. Could be as much as a 30% loss in power. That energy loss is through the generation of heat, so that heat has to be dissipated with a cooler.
9935452 wrote: » We looked at this for the vacuum tank. One thing we found was the hydraulic motors are specced for revolutions per litre of oil. The problem is older tractors have lower capacity pumps 30/40litres per minute . newer tractors 70/80lpm. If you go for an average motor, the older tractor will be revved flat out to get the speed up , the newer one will be running too fast at tickover.
blue5000 wrote: » I could have sworn I had one of these somewhere in the back of the jeep. So instead of driving 12 miles, I used this instead.
bogman_bass wrote: » http://www.thepoke.co.uk/2017/05/09/smallest-terrifying-rollercoaster-world/ Some top class guttering here
Muckit wrote: » You know when you've been doing something for a while and have yourself convinced that it is the only way to do things..... then you see it done another (better) way and you feel like clapping and giving that man a medal! NB... This is not about the type of fence post but the way he puts up the wire. Just watch the first 10 secs and you'll know what I mean! Only thing ld change is I'd probably put down posts on way out not back...https://youtu.be/N0Cm9DVgUN4
patsy_mccabe wrote: » I think it's easier to run the line fully first and then go back with the posts. That way the posts are in a straight line.
rangler1 wrote: » Yea it's a joke sometimes to look back when you think you've walked a straight line
Muckit wrote: » I don't have a quad and so fences put up on foot. You are holding a reel and trying to hold 8-10 pigtails. I haven't tried it but if it did work, it would seem easier to hook on reel and just pull wire out. Put as you say pedigree, in practice the polywire can tangle or find it's way off the spool even with the guide.
pedigree 6 wrote: » I don't get it Muckit! If I had to do that with the strip wires I use it wouldn't work as sometimes the the little wires get caught in one another and surely if I left the reel on the fence and walked off with one end i'd be gone 20ft and it would be stuck into one another and i'd have to go back to the reel and free it. What I do and most people i'd say is put a loop on one end and put it on a strong pigtail and then walk with the reel and stakes and do the one job as I go along (unroll and put stakes up) and then when I get to the other end wrap the wire on the metal crook on the reel and hook to fence or if there is no electric fence at the reel end to put a current in the strip wire, drop the pigtail with strip wire attached over the electric fence at the start and walk on. There should be no need to walk twice along the one stripwire. Edit: you can do the above either walking or from the quad.
Nekarsulm wrote: » When you lose the spring and cover off your strimmer, but really realhttp://imgur.com/pD8DY2S