El_Duderino 09 wrote: » I'm classing all 4 as victims to some extent or another.
kfallon wrote: » El_Duderino 09 wrote: » We all pay lip service to mental health but when the rubber meets the road, it's a different story. I should think anyone can see that the mad wasn't in his right mind when he did it. All 4 are victims of mental health. I'm just glad this issue didn't affect me but I don't see the point in slagging off any one of the victims in this tragedy. Who slagged off the 'victims' in this tragedy?
El_Duderino 09 wrote: » We all pay lip service to mental health but when the rubber meets the road, it's a different story. I should think anyone can see that the mad wasn't in his right mind when he did it. All 4 are victims of mental health. I'm just glad this issue didn't affect me but I don't see the point in slagging off any one of the victims in this tragedy.
jimmycrackcorm wrote: » political analyst wrote: Considering that the priest who said the funeral Mass was a friend of Hawe, wasn't it a conflict of interest for him to say the Mass? Shouldn't he have passed on the responsibility to another priest? Was it public knowledge at the time that Hawe was a wife beater? AFAIR metal health issues was assumed asset the time and it only came out after this want the case. There are lots of other cases of filicide for example where there is empathy due to underlying mental health issues.
political analyst wrote: Considering that the priest who said the funeral Mass was a friend of Hawe, wasn't it a conflict of interest for him to say the Mass? Shouldn't he have passed on the responsibility to another priest?
kfallon wrote: » murpho999 wrote: » No I'm not just don't think there's all this need for calling him scumbag etc, and reading comments on other fora for him to be thrown in the sea or dumped. Just find that OTT. Yeah tbh scumbag is a bit much for a man who butchered his helpless wife & children alright :rolleyes:
murpho999 wrote: » No I'm not just don't think there's all this need for calling him scumbag etc, and reading comments on other fora for him to be thrown in the sea or dumped. Just find that OTT.
livedadream wrote: » ''you said what was he doing to them'' the post you commented on sais he was abusing them, i wasnt aware you needed the ins and outs of what abuse is.... The inquest was put on hold, there is no offical final answer but her mother and sister have been very clear in the interviews they have done and the requests they have made.
robbiezero wrote: » livedadream wrote: » did you read the post? he was abusing his wife and controlling the kids allegedly in regards to religion. her family have asked for donations and more awareness be made of domestic violence and domestic issues other than just violence (things like controlling finances, access to own phones free time etc) Yes I read the post. The questions I asked were not answered in it. I am just interested. I have not really read that much in a long while about the case and I had not realized that they had established the reasons behind the murders.
livedadream wrote: » did you read the post? he was abusing his wife and controlling the kids allegedly in regards to religion. her family have asked for donations and more awareness be made of domestic violence and domestic issues other than just violence (things like controlling finances, access to own phones free time etc)
biZrb wrote: » Such a heartbreaking case. I do feel for Alans family (not anymore than I do for Clodagh's), I'm sure it must horrible knowing a family member was such a monster.
robbiezero wrote: » January wrote: » It came out pretty soon after the murders that it wasn't his mental health that lead him to murder his wife and children but that he was an abuser and murdered them because he was about to be exposed as the vile human being he actually was and not the 'pillar of society' everyone thought he was. It's a crying shame that he was even labelled as mentally unstable. What was he doing to them? Who was going to out him?
January wrote: » It came out pretty soon after the murders that it wasn't his mental health that lead him to murder his wife and children but that he was an abuser and murdered them because he was about to be exposed as the vile human being he actually was and not the 'pillar of society' everyone thought he was. It's a crying shame that he was even labelled as mentally unstable.
political analyst wrote: » Considering that the priest who said the funeral Mass was a friend of Hawe, wasn't it a conflict of interest for him to say the Mass? Shouldn't he have passed on the responsibility to another priest?
murpho999 wrote: » Was a stupid decision to bury them together in the first place. Either way all the comments about 'rot in hell' and him being cowardly and disgusting actually show a complete misunderstanding of mental health issues which he clearly suffered from and no I'm not making excuses for him.
Toots wrote: » Most likely to be buried elsewhere or cremated and have the ashes scattered or buried elsewhere. AFAIK it was the local priest who recommended the joint funeral and burial.
The Parish Priest. wrote: » I actually know someone who was Taught by that gimp almost 20 years ago, he used to tease certain boys, one boy he used to mock his accent and other boy he used to mock his weight. He uesd to put his legs up on his desk and he'd read the sun newspaper in clsss.
The Parish Priest. wrote: » I actually know someone who was Taught by that gimp almost 20 years ago, he used to tease certain boys, one boy he used to mock his accent and other boy he used to mock his weight. He uesd to put his legs up on his desk and he'd read the sun newspaper in class.
murpho999 wrote: » I'm not naive, I like most people here, do not fully know the full circumstances despite what people think they know because they have read stuff on the internet so just don't get into over the top reactions. Simple as that.
kfallon wrote: » No set of circumstances can absolve or justify a man from killing his own wife & children, especially as it was premeditated!
murpho999 wrote: » I'm not naive, I like most people here, do not fully know the full circumstances despite what people think they know because they have read stuff on the internet so just don't get into over the top reactions.
mikeoneilly wrote: » It's actually you who is naive