The Ayatolla wrote: » Right now he's taking some well deserved time off, blowing off some steam and about to be a father. Who should he have fought instead of Nate? He wanted to avenge a loss. The LW belt at that time was tied up and he had cleaned out the FW division.
The Ayatolla wrote: » Who should he have fought instead of Nate? He wanted to avenge a loss. The LW belt at that time was tied up and he had cleaned out the FW division.
akelly02 wrote: » jose aldo had beaten edgar for the interim? he was the obvious one
Mr. Manager wrote: » So fúcking what?
The Ayatolla wrote: » It's a competitive fight. He had lost in a roller-coaster fight that could have gone either way? The world and their mother wanted to see the fight, and both fighters wanted it? A guy he KO'd in 13 seconds that he travelled around the world promoting? I'm a huge McGregor fan and even back then a rematch against Aldo made no sense. This is prize-fighting folks, not the Olympics.
McGregor/Diaz is an anti-superfight. Total joke shop.
Mr. Manager wrote: » So fúcking what?
Mr. Manager wrote: » Ugh, I can't believe I'm talking about money making fights and not legitimate contender fights. The UFC is slowly becoming a total joke show with this sh*t
wonderfullife wrote: » 3 of Conor's last 5 fights have been for a belt. Mendes, Aldo and Alvarez. MMA fans don't know how good we have it. Bisping v GSP might annoy people. Conor v Nate might rankle. Conor skipping the queue direct to Alvarez and possibly Woodley might irritate people. You'd think we might just be a small bit appreciative of the fact these are all still amazing and competitive fights as opposed to boxing throwing in champions against outright bums to pad crazy unbeaten records. Whether people like it or not, the UFC are not going to pin a huge card on Khabib showing up fight night. The only justifiable fight to make at 155lbs is Conor v Ferguson. That'd be a great fight and I'm completely in favour of it. The UFC are still leaving tens of millions on the table putting on Conor v Ferguson instead of Conor v Woodley/GSP/Nate. You're talking about 0 title defences but I'd say you wouldn't be too impressed from a sporting perspective if he defends it against Nate either.
Gamebred wrote: » Dont believe a word Dana says proven liar over and over, his openess about it makes me think its not happening.
wonderfullife wrote: » The one thing Dana keeps emphasizing is this: "The fight doesn't make much sense from our perspective but I want to do this for Conor". If that's really his attitude he wouldn't have pulled Conor from UFC 200 if he felt the company owes Conor a solid. To me that indicates the fight is 100% happening and Dana is playing the martyr, "taking one for the team", so he can use it in future negotiations with Conor on a new contract - i.e. Remember we did the Floyd fight for you so don't get too greedy on this next deal! I'm sure the tens of millions the UFC are going to make on the Floyd fight don't come into it...... :rolleyes:
PREG1967 wrote: » Aldo-lamb to the slaughterhttp://www.punditarena.com/mmaufc/sraftery/jose-aldos-heard-trying-calm-brazilian-conor-mcgregor-fight-unseen-footage-enhanced-audio/
EagererBeaver wrote: » What a load of ****e! Just corner talk psyching him for the fight ffs
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » I love when it turns into psychoanalysis hour on here.
PREG1967 wrote: » So you dont question someones pyschological state when a massive change occurs in their usual behaviour? You need to ask more questions if thats the case
Swashbuckler wrote: » Have you looked at Aldo before any of his other fights? Tell me what was different the night of the Conor fight?
PREG1967 wrote: » [ All his actions proof he was not calm and tht is why he over stretched his team obviously sensed a change to his normal calmness
The Ayatolla wrote: » He has his head down when he got in the cage.
The Ayatolla wrote: » Knew I'd catch someone