Parliament is on lockdown after gunshots were heard outside the Palace of Westminster.
Depp wrote: you can be perfectly mentally healthy and still fall victim to indoctrination/brainwashing
pangbang wrote: » That's an excellent point! Sarcasm aside, do you dispute any of those things? I mean to say, if you take immigration out of the equation, do you dispute our reduced infrastructural ability, less jobs, more debt, unaffordable housing etc? Now add in immigration. Is immigration adding to the problems, or ameliorating the problems? Its simply pragmatism. Brutal and harsh, and admittedly sad, but still reality nonetheless.
snowflaker wrote: » Have you read any of my other posts?
donkeykong5 wrote: » Cheers. That made me laugh out loud.
coco0981 wrote: » Charming
snowflaker wrote: » Hello 100% brand new poster welcome to boards, got settled into this thread quickly!
Omackeral wrote: » They're mostly whataboutery to be honest.
gitzy16v wrote: » Im not here to charm anyone thanks
snowflaker wrote: » You can't abuse posters either.
snowflaker wrote: » donkeykong5 wrote: » Cheers. That made me laugh out loud. You laugh at people being abusive to others? Charming.
Omackeral wrote: » Why would anyone bother when this is the type of tripe you come out with? All you did was stick a txdr (I assume you meant tldr) after his post. He then again tried to engage you by asking questions.
coco0981 wrote: » Well obviously not given your post, care to add to the debate rather than throwing abuse around?
coco0981 wrote: » If you are simply talking in economic terms then Europe as a whole needs immigration to balance out its aging population
pangbang wrote: » to snowflaker (because I don't get the quoting system yet), I'd imagine your insinuation is that I'm some other member on here pretending to be someone else. I'm not. Like a lot of people, I imagine, I don't bother commenting on these things. But as I mentioned in my first post, its getting ridiculous and I was pissed off enough to just join in on the this conversation/debate/argument. Simple as that.
snowflaker wrote: » Do you just recycle the same few words when you haven't a cogent argument?
Yourself isit wrote: » No it doesn't. If you use immigration to fix the pension crisis then you need even more immigration to fix the pebsion crisis causes by the immigrants aging.
gitzy16v wrote: » No Id like to read both sides of the argument without clowns dragging it down like always
Omackeral wrote: » I think you'll find I've argued both for and against different elements of the Muslim world and Islamic issues actually. Don't see what's been unclear in any of my posts either to be quite honest. Meanwhile, all you've done is snipe at people really and make half points. Rhetorical questions are another calling card of yours it would seem.
snowflaker wrote: » no, too xenophobic, didnt read
pangbang wrote: » to coco0891.....ive heard it all, but never bothered commenting. The idea of replacement people is a pyramid scheme. To use a simplified example.... 1 person is alive and works in a country. They retire having not had any children. You need to import 2 people to make up for the original guy when he retires, one to continue on the original job, and another to "look after" the retired person (contribute to pensions, what have you) Now comes the genius part....those 2 new people will retire eventually. And each of them will require two people each (that's 4 people, for the mathematically disinclined)....... see where that leads to? Its a pyramid scheme that is based on infinite resources. In other words, a scam.
snowflaker wrote: » So you joined boards, tonight, to specifically join this discussion. I acknowledged you were a new poster btw. I just find it bizarre this is where you "jump in"
coco0981 wrote: » Gives out about clowns dragging down argument but yet first post is to tell someone to f**k off, irony
gitzy16v wrote: » Only asked for what he said he was doing earlier....if you got a problem pm me instead of trying to act big on the internet