steddyeddy wrote: » The second part is a fair point. I don't agree with the first part. As a whole the British security forces in the North didn't use conventional warfare.
Manic Moran wrote: » If you are unable to see the difference between a force generally attempting to adhere to the conventions of warfare and a force which attempts to just generally cause mayhem, we're not going to have a fruitful discussion.
flutered wrote: » stockdam wrote: » Ok by that reasoning then, I can understand. I knew idiots who joined paramilitaries and one who was arrested and put into the Maze. I had the same upbringing and "repression" but never for one minute thought of resorting to violence. Neither Adams or McGuinness nor any other paramilitary had more right than I had to feel they they needed to kill anyone.........it was just wrong. what would have been the result of things if the burning of streets of houses in nationalist areas had been allowed to continue, the b men the army etc were not interested, circumstanses alter cases, castro mandella etc, the we had the opposite from peron for one
stockdam wrote: » Ok by that reasoning then, I can understand. I knew idiots who joined paramilitaries and one who was arrested and put into the Maze. I had the same upbringing and "repression" but never for one minute thought of resorting to violence. Neither Adams or McGuinness nor any other paramilitary had more right than I had to feel they they needed to kill anyone.........it was just wrong.
Jamiekelly wrote: » Seen the BBC's report, the mainland uk one not the NI one. A reporter asked the father of a bombing victim, i think it was Parry, whether he considered McGuinness a friend? His answer was, surprise surprise, no. Top class journalism there from the BBC. The same BBC that runs numerous segments almost daily on the BBC World News channel about "What can the media do... better?/ to make people trust us again?/ to not alienate viewers? I swear the more and more I watch major news networks during big events the more I understand why Trump's "dumb media" line resonates.
Jamiekelly wrote: » Soldiers fathering entire families linked to suspected IRA members while "on deployment". Cant be to sure if he's in the RA? Well he does have a sister so its time to take one for Queen and Country and get you're weapon out.. 100 percent taxpayer funded. Got to give it to the Brits, they're pragmatic at the very least.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Here's the lovely Norman spreading aspersions about the testimony of the accusers of his mate Jimmy Saville, In fact, try and read the whole article without getting nauseous would be my challenge! :rolleyes:https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/jun/15/norman-tebbit-interview
FrancieBrady wrote: » Have to say it was great to hear Pierce Doherty put Aine English back in her box when she tried the 'man with two lives' bollixology.
andekwarhola wrote: » I roundly dislike people like Tebbit as much as the next person but his wife was left disabled after the Brighton Bombing. We're hardly going to turn to him for a balanced quote, are we? Some people in here ironically cheerleading McGuiness might be better off making the brave intellectual and political journey that he did.
cnoc wrote: » Who is Áine English?
FrancieBrady wrote: » In amongst the trite moralising there is there support for what Tebbit had to say today? Are you asking me to give him a pass because he was one of thousands of victims? Sorry, no can do.
andekwarhola wrote: » You and your ilk love griping about 'themuns'. And you'll be doing it until the grave. Thank fcuk the likes of McGuiness and Adams were in the driving seat (and not the armchair).
FrancieBrady wrote: » Identifies people as 'you and your ilk' and then rants about them going on about 'themuns' Classic. Well done. :D
andekwarhola wrote: » Thanks. Getting beered up to continue the vicarious terrorist campaign later?
My name is URL wrote: » stockdam wrote: » I had the same upbringing and "repression" but never for one minute thought of resorting to violence. Well that's your own perogative Some people will fight back when pushed beyond a certain point. Others are happy to bend over and take it.
stockdam wrote: » I had the same upbringing and "repression" but never for one minute thought of resorting to violence.
Fratton Fred wrote: » When I read your first post, I thought you were simply mistaken. when I read your second, I realised you were being deliberately obtuse. Please take time and effort to listen to the whole interview. there is another tv interview on the BBC website as wellhttp://www.bbc.com/news/uk-39337136
stockdam wrote: » You do know who Parry is? Why would he forgive McGuinness? Would you in the same position? Ok so you said immediately above that they shouldn't have asked him. I agree as anyone who has lost their 12 year old kid who was not involved would answer.....you are hardly going to be friends with the person who was involved in the organisation who killed him.
DanielODonnell wrote: » McGuinness was a true Gael, he will go down in the history books alongside the likes of Owen Roe O'Neill and Aodh O'Donnell as notorious men of Ulster. It is a great pity that fools are allowed air time on the news like the loyalists who said that it was McGuinness and IRA who caused the war and he wouldn't have had to build peace in the first place if it wasn't for the IRA. Then when you turn over to RTE you have Kenny standing in front of a painting of Michael Collins, you just have to laugh at that sort of thing.