davis27 wrote: » Would it be what there saying is there is no port connection on the splitter distribution point available to me (see pic boc at end of my road). presumably fibre is split in this box to the different houseshttps://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2Nnmrg6-w0IUGg0dVJkZHJsZkU/view?usp=sharing
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » How many ports on a line card? 16? So at 1:32 split if they had 512 customers on one card they would have to add another.
digiman wrote: » For GPON one port can serve up to 128 customers depending on the split ratio of the splitter, this is normally 1:32 but can be greater or less by a factor of 2. You could have a scenario where they have planned lets say 40 homes on a road of one 1:32 splitter and you are now the 33rd customer on this splitter. What would need to happen is that they would need to put in another splitter for the remaining 8 customers as the take-up was much higher than what was planned for initially. The above is pretty unlikely as it would mean they have had 80% take-up in a few weeks which would be way higher than they would have planned for. Anyway, above is just again speculation.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » Tralee has had urban FTTH for a while now. There is a scenario where if there were enough subscribers to the service between urban and rural that they could have run out of slots. It would mean the addition of another GPON line card which would be an economic decision for Openeir. The above is just speculation and not particularly likely in my opinion.
davis27 wrote: » im not aware of urban ftth in tralee, not eir anyway, siro has recently gone live but i thought the only reason for rural fibre was because siro has urban pretty much rapped up in the town.
davis27 wrote: » well pamela doesnt want to know...... Hi Pamela, sorry for the tormentation but ftth is only gone live in tralee since 8th of march, unlike current eircom fibre offerings(fibre to the cabinet) the ports in use would be copper connections. So if ftth is enabled you would expect a new (updated exchange) with available ports as my understanding is ftth wouldnt be using the fttc cabinet so i dont see how there is no ports available when it a brand new service that went live on the 8th of march. If i ordered regular broadband fttc and was told it was full id accept that as id know that all the ports in the cabinet have been taken by existing customers of fttc with copper connecting ports..... "Hi Davis27, Thanks for getting back in touch. Unfortunately, I cannot advise of this information from here as it is in relation to eir infrastructure and our planning and development department would determine this. I am sorry I could not help you any further with this."
davis27 wrote: » exactly its not making sense hence why i am continuing to push them on it.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » It is a brand new world class network. Does it seem logical to you that it would have been designed so badly that they would be struggling for capacity at launch?
davis27 wrote: » i asked pamela in eir for clarity on what they mean by exchange ports "Our cabinets and exchanges are made up of ports that supply services to our customers. There is only a certain number of ports in each exchange. In your case all the ports are in use at the moment so I'm afraid that is why we cannot offer you a service. Unfortunately, you would not have visibility of these sports as the technician would need to access the exchange in order to view these. " i was told by eir that the ftth exchange was gone live since 8th march, if this is a new exchange with ports that are supplying ftth how are they full already??
davis27 wrote: » 100% ftth broadband extreme
davis27 wrote: » I contacted eir through twitter and they told me they have to get the order before they check if there is an available port.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » Thanks. I didn't realise that. It explains the discrepancy in numbers.
knipex wrote: » Is there live FTTH in your area ? Are you on a blue line ?
davis27 wrote: » This village is 3 miles outside the town so there is a fibre line that runs from the town to the village fttc green box. My question is ftth using the existing fibre strand that runs from the green fttc to the town. Inside the green box you have a fibre connection (from the town)and also copper ports that provides existing fttc customers. From what I can see theres room for fibre ports aswell inside this green box. Are eir saying there currently no ports available for ftth yet. Or am I totally wrong and the fibre from the pole outside my house runs all the way from my house to somewhere in the town. I would have thought the logical thing would be to use the existing fibre connection that already in place that feeding the village. When referring to the exchange are we talking about this box attached?
davis27 wrote: » No I'm not mixing it up as I never mentioned copper the last mile. Let me explain my location. I live 3 miles outside a village. This village has a fttc box. This village is 3 miles outside the town so there is a fibre line that runs from the town to the village fttc green box. My question is ftth using the existing fibre strand that runs from the green fttc to the town. Inside the green box you have a fibre connection (from the town)and also copper ports that provides existing fttc customers. From what I can see theres room for fibre ports aswell inside this green box. Are eir saying there currently no ports available for ftth yet. Or am I totally wrong and the fibre from the pole outside my house runs all the way from my house to somewhere in the town. I would have thought the logical thing would be to use the existing fibre connection that already in place that feeding the village. When referring to the exchange are we talking about this box attached?
ED E wrote: » You're totally mixing up FTTC and FTTH. This is the FTTH thread, FTTC includes copper last mile and has a port limit per cab.
ACLFC7 wrote: » Portarlington was also a part of the 66 towns - https://www.eir.ie/opencms/export/sites/default/.content/pdf/IR/news/eircom_Expands_Fibre_to_the_Home_Footprint_map.pdf
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » Portarlington (Laois) was due to get 260 premises but according to the map 460 premises were passed. That may be just a typo though.