Hunky Monster wrote: » Even good ones. The price has climbed up again due to lads wanting Altezza lookalikes but 4.5k is beyond laughable.
Hunky Monster wrote: » Ah stop, these things were making 1500euro a few years ago. Even good ones. The price has climbed up again due to lads wanting Altezza lookalikes but 4.5k is beyond laughable.
bear1 wrote: » The ad alone would convince me to part with 4.5k I'd prefer that to an altezza though.
JohnBoy26 wrote: » An altezza is a better car tbh. You'd expect to pay 4k+ for one of those. is200's aren't worth a whole pile these days
bear1 wrote: » But on a run the is would beat it no? Considering an altezza would be limited to 180. Around our way years ago the way people were doing them up put me off them. Always preferred the is.
JohnBoy26 wrote: » The beams engine in the altezza is better and offers more performance. They are limited but I think they can be delimited. Id agree about them being done up, most are done up in a tacky way and are wrecked but a nice one can look very well
punisher5112 wrote: » You would need to invest in a trailer and keep it on it. That would never pass a test. 3.5 litre tax is a tad bit more then the 2.0 €710 ha must think people are that stupid.
Patww79 wrote: » So much better looking in its previous guise.
johndaman66 wrote: » ^^ I love them cars to bits. They do have a seriously strong following in this country and it looks in good order (albeit the rear door appears to be a different shade of white in the 1st pic - but that might just be my imagination) but I can't see it fetching anything near €9k unless I'm seriously out of touch....
magentis wrote: » Shut lines around the rear light clusters don't look right either.