PeterTheNinth wrote: » I'd say Finucane hates him. His impressions of her are less than complimentary.
Oops69 wrote: » Am I hungover or are they really saying paschal o'donohoe is a potential contender for ENda's replacement ?....sweet Jesus , I GIve up on this conurty ever having a real leader again .
PeterTheNinth wrote: » It really annoys me that this is this underlying tone about all of these cosy discussions that the election of Trump and the vote for BREXIT were the WRONG things to do. Both of these were voted through democratically by the two nations. What right do a lot of well heeled Irish commentators have to question the democratic right of other sovereign nations.
PeterTheNinth wrote: » I'm curious about that as well. Did he not explicitly say that he was NOT interested in the job?
Oops69 wrote: » Am I hungover or are they really saying paschal o'donohoe is a potential contender for ENda's replacement ?....sweet Jesus , I GIve up on this country ever having a real leader again .
PeterTheNinth wrote: » What right do a lot of well heeled Irish commentators have to question the democratic right of other sovereign nations.
Brendan Bendar wrote: » I guess you must be hungover, you don't even know the guys name.
Oops69 wrote: » Easy enough common error to miss out an 'o' in a name ,is that as good as it gets from his petty childish supporters ,
Brendan Bendar wrote: » Oops, it's not quite as simple as that. You use the forum to heap odium on the political scenario, just a straightforward attack ............. And you allow the post to go out with the wrong name.!!! Posts like that have zero credibility and calling them out is neither petty or childish. It encourages posters to be a little more careful and maybe will be taken seriously when they get their act together.
foxtrot101 wrote: » Oh, the same right as you have to complain about them Peter and you do so at about the same frequency.
PeterTheNinth wrote: » Healy-Rae, an admirer of Trump. LOL. This wont fit Marion's agenda. :pac:
thedudeinthehat wrote: » It doesn't fit anyone's thinking or agenda. Generally when people say they are "for" trump it is code for "for" casual racism, anti state anti public policy or against progressivism.