Patww79 wrote: » This post has been deleted.
lawred2 wrote: » There is 6 is them. After overheads that's not going to go too far.
Dots1982 wrote: » There's not 6 of them. Richie is not incorporated as having a role within their financial statements:http://www.solocheck.ie/Irish-Company/Second-Captains-Limited-525975#report-2
dulpit wrote: » Radio show, TV show, columns, appearances on other media orgs. They all work to increase their visibility, which will increase their revenues (hopefully at least)
duffman13 wrote: » Yes but surely that is no longer the case if Richie is now gonna be doing one show a week. I know he's trying to raise his profile but committing to a couple of hours a week is surely going to see him on the payroll now.
Dots1982 wrote: » One show a month so no not going to make much difference
bren2001 wrote: » Do Ken and Murph get paid by the Irish Times for their columns or are Second Captains paid? The first seems logical but the second seems fairer as it is tougher for Simon and Mark to find other revenue sources.
duffman13 wrote: » Dots1982 wrote: » One show a month so no not going to make much difference I thought it was once a week
duffman13 wrote: » I thought it was once a week
Dots1982 wrote: » 90% sure i read it yesterday that it somewhere it would be once a month, not able to find it now though. please accept my apologies if i turn out to be wrong.
duffman13 wrote: » Dots1982 wrote: » 90% sure i read it yesterday that it somewhere it would be once a month, not able to find it now though. please accept my apologies if i turn out to be wrong. Ah no, I just assumed it was once a week the way they were chatting about it. Your most likely right to be honest
duffman13 wrote: » I don't know but id assume the lads get paid themselves and not Second Captains.
tomwaits48 wrote: » each of the lads invoiced the Second Captains company circa 90k last year according to the accounts.
Cazale wrote: » I can't imagine it was anywhere near that on Newstalk either.
lawred2 wrote: » moot point even if it's only 5 directors - that sort of income is not going to pay the piper
Ursus Horribilis wrote: » What'll be interesting to watch is how many people will continue to pay after the first month or two.
JuanJose wrote: » True. I'd say a fair number have done the initial sign-up on the back of their ballsy move to podcast-land & the 4 years of listenership. Income streams will be more directly dependent than ever on the material they produce though. This could crash & burn or it could float quite well. Hopefully it's the latter.