manual_man wrote: » Not quite accurate. Re. the injury the extent wasn't known with rumblings that it was a persistent problem along with Aké recalled. Add in that quite alot were on wildcard and Chelsea, on the back of conceding twice in both their previous league games, had some tricky upcoming fixtures. So not at all an unreasonable move to make i don't think.
FutureGuy wrote: » Mod: So I highlighted your comment last gw and asked not to post like that again. You'll get a ban next time and I'll be keeping an eye on you.
wanderer100 wrote: » This is brilliant!!! Apparently a lot of people ditched him this week which makes it even better. Go on son!!!!!!!!!!!
spock. wrote: » Pedro
dr.kenneth noisewater wrote: » Got rid of Alonso to facilitate getting in Giroud, didnt have a bad week so far but keeping him would have made it a great week. Chambers CS as his replacement is something at least
Hogey007 wrote: » Not really. 11 times in previous 14 he got 6 or more points. Wasn't as if he wasn't returning points. Injury fear was an ongoing thing that was being managed
dahat wrote: » In fairness a Snapchat of him on a physio table with a few sad and angry emoij from Alonso himself was a bit more than a media report.
jamesbere wrote: » Away all day, just checking. Alonso you great man. On 73 with potential bonuses to 81. Whoop whoop
SlickRic wrote: » Alonso is just proof that you shouldn't read too much into every report you see. I over thought it, and got burned.
ShaneU wrote: » Alonso nearly scored again
extra gravy wrote: » Thank god he only has 8% ownership...It could be worse for non owners.