A Little Pony wrote: » This is the truth, Sinn Fein aren't fooling anyone with half a brain. The guy looks like he is dying, why don't they just say so, Sinn Fein don't resign over corruption or scandals as they enjoy that part of political life as much as the next party.
FreudianSlippers wrote: » SF and DUP reps on Morning Ireland this morning... I personally believe SF has the higher ground here, but they went straight in on the personal attack talking point of calling everyone "arrogant"... I just don't see how this is SF's strategy both from their posters on here and in real life! It's trolling. I mean - it totally worked this morning and the DUP representative went off the rails immediately; but it's not very mature politically. I would have firmly supported SF in relation to their decision to withdraw, but they're not winning any support by acting like children.
FrancieBrady wrote: » In fairness, the first words out of Jeffery sounded like we were back in the 70's. The problem with the DUP is arrogance. Arrogance about their past and arrogance about their so called fiscal rectitude etc when there are allegations flying around about fingers being caught in a number of very lucrative tills. They are going to be called on it and rightly so in my opinion. It is blocking any progress in the GFA and government.
FreudianSlippers wrote: » Look, I'm not saying he came across well at all - SF just needs to learn how to be more clinical in their strikes. To the average Southerner (arguably not fully clued in on all the goings on up North), I thought SF came across poorly this morning when yesterday evening I was fully supporting them.
FrancieBrady wrote: » I think it is safe to say that for some obsessives this was always going to be about SF and somehow their fault. However the reality is, when Martin retires after a long career the DUP are going to have to go to the people and answer for Arlenes suicidal Brexit gaffe and RHI not to mention the NAMA debacle. The main damage to them will not be done by SF but by other unionists.
FrancieBrady wrote: » Jeffery Donaldson sets out his stall on Morning Ireland. This is all going to be about 'Stopping a SF MLA becoming First Minister', nothing to do with issues.
A Little Pony wrote: » The DUP will still remain the largest party. I don't see Sinn Fein making up enough ground for that change, in such a short period of time.
FrancieBrady wrote: » A Little Pony wrote: » The DUP will still remain the largest party. I don't see Sinn Fein making up enough ground for that change, in such a short period of time. For what change? I said they will be damaged by other unionists. All the UUP will want here is to chip away another bit at the DUP vote and to stoke some internal fighting in the DUP.
A Little Pony wrote: » DUP won 38 seats in 2016, UUP won 16. How many are the UUP going to take off the DUP? The DUP would need an absolute collapse!
FrancieBrady wrote: » A Little Pony wrote: » DUP won 38 seats in 2016, UUP won 16. How many are the UUP going to take off the DUP? The DUP would need an absolute collapse! Which bit of 'chip away another bit' are you having bother with there?
A Little Pony wrote: » Sinn Fein can't possibly ever lose any seats then.
FreudianSlippers wrote: » Based on the last election, I'd say UUP could contest max. 4 additional seats from DUP: E. Antrim, S. Antrim, Strangford and Lagan Valley.
Jayop wrote: » DUP now have 37 to SFs 28. Should SF be able to add a few themselves and the UUP or TUV take a few from the DUP then that gap could close pretty quickly.
Danzy wrote: » I think the question for the next assembly and the 2 Governments is to look at joint authority as the default option when the Assembly is not running. Parties like the DUP will never tolerate a fenian around the place, no matter the background. Look at how they treated the SDLP. The only certainty is that through not wanting to make things work they will ensure a worse deal from their point of view in a few years time.
FrancieBrady wrote: » The two governments need to get tough here, they need to call out the footdraggers and those playing the sectarian card to thwart progress.
kbannon wrote: » What about the misogyny card?
Terrontress wrote: » Has there not been some element of electoral reform which is reducing the number of MLAs in most constituencies by one? Or reducing the number of constituencies overall? The big question might be which parties lose the fewest rather than which can gain the most.
CrabRevolution wrote: » FrancieBrady wrote: » I think it is safe to say that for some obsessives this was always going to be about SF and somehow their fault. However the reality is, when Martin retires after a long career the DUP are going to have to go to the people and answer for Arlenes suicidal Brexit gaffe and RHI not to mention the NAMA debacle. The main damage to them will not be done by SF but by other unionists. This always stuck out for me too. I've a healthy disdain for all politicians so have no allegiance to Sinn Féin or any party, but there's a huge double standard even from the media in the Republic. When Sinn Féin do anything wrong they're criticised for it. When the DUP do something, Sinn Féin are accused of "not holding them to account" or of "dancing to the DUPs tune". If Sinn Féin promote anything vaguely culturally Irish (like the language) it's "sectarian politics which alienates unionists". If the DUP support the orange order, promote creationism and oppose gay rights, it's "not what I agree with, but are delivering for their voters".
A Little Pony wrote: » Orange Order has wide spread support within Unionism. Many of them are in the Orange Order. The DUP plays to that core base, if they didn't win, they wouldn't win elections.
CrabRevolution wrote: » And the creationism? Opposing gay rights?
