professore wrote: You're closer to the truth than a lot of men realise. And the worst of it is the women know Jack in accounts just wants a ride, including his girlfriend, but they don't care. You forgot the but where they claim some sort of mental illness or personality disorder to justify their actions.
Stealthfins wrote: » It's not you mate it's them,brats expecting Adonis.....and a body like Michael Angelo to boot. You're fcked if you don't drive a heap of **** like an Audi or BMW.... You have to be able to bring them shopping to Brown Thomas spend everything you have on their puss...and they won't let you out without wearing Aventus creed,or something similar. Then you'll feel all comfortable and at one with yourself,youll start to eat more and then you're not as hot as Jack in Accounts. Jack is a creep but she doesn't see it that way,hes a hero because he bought his girlfriend a pair of those heels with red velvet underneath and agentprovecteur lingerie.... There's a Christmas party coming up,Jack in accounts is going to be there and hell be ripped,wearing Gucci brogue shoes,nice Italian chinos,and a Paul Smith fitted shirt,he'll also have a dishy smile "glint" **** It's the era of sex love and attention addiction. I'm a Lucky bastrd because I'm like a cross between Richard Gere and George Clooney. I'm a so called salt n pepper silver fox at 41 5"11 and toned. My son is nearly 17 I'm successful,have a nice house, and never was married or intend to. But if all came to all I'd much prefer a nice attractive country or towny woman than one of those glamour puss from Tinder They'll end up fckn you over anyway, POF is full of them..... I've no intention of settling down Because I'm worth it ðŸ˜
blacklilly wrote: » I don't get the mass generalisation that Irish women are overly picky.
blacklilly wrote: » I along with a few of my friends are single, I'd consider us all to be friendly, good looking, successful women but we cannot meet a genuine, sound, decent guy.
blacklilly wrote: » In this age of dating, people are considered disposable and there's very little respect left out there. God forbid you want to know where you stand with someone after a couple of months of dating. If you dare ask you're seen as clingy or desperate!
blacklilly wrote: » It's a total mind field out there, now more than ever we have more choice and it seems that people are afraid to give anything a proper go with someone cause they feel there may be someone better in the tinder swipping world.
blacklilly wrote: » I'm not for one second suggesting that people should settle but we really do need to take a look at how tinder and other online platforms are making us behave.
Dr Jakub wrote: » Time save up and head to Asia!
Alpha_zero wrote: » Tinder is a hook up app that is a fact, if you do meet a girl from it in person for drinks, odds are she is looking for a hook up just the same as you, hence the nature of the app.
Sonics2k wrote: » I was only arguing with that one line "There was never anywhere, in any time, where there were loads of girls looking to simply hook up for casual sex." because it's just wrong.
Dr Crayfish wrote: » Of course you do, but my original post was opposing the view that Tinder is there for "hook ups", by which he meant meeting up purely for sex. I would have thought most people out trying to score are usually looking for a little more than that, perhaps I'm naiive.
Dr Crayfish wrote: » I'm not whinging!? I never said women don't send messages if they're not good looking, you had said previously that you don't get responses from men so I asked if you were good looking and that seemed to cause offence so I'm sorry about that.
Surreptitious wrote: » Erra quit whinging. Women don't send messages then they're not good looking. Can't find sex, not looking for sex. Plenty of wans up for it if you walk the streets at 3 am scouring the joint.
Sonics2k wrote: » Neither am I, I've been in a relationship these past 5 years, but you'd be mad to think there aren't plenty of places where you'll find a tonne of girls on nights out looking to hook up with someone.
Dr Crayfish wrote: » I'm not looking particularly looking for casual sex
Sonics2k wrote: » You need to get out more, or at least go to other places.
Dr Crayfish wrote: » I've never used it but I'm pretty sure this is absolute nonsense. There was never anywhere, in any time, where there were loads of girls looking to simply hook up for casual sex. Unless you were paying for it. Before anyone says Coppers etc. If that was the case why aren't the guys moaning about Tinder and jaw lines in here in Coppers every week picking up chicks?
BabyE wrote: » Nah man its the western world. Its the same everywhere!
Surreptitious wrote: » It's a meet you there in ten minutes job. Pure hook ups.
Alpha_zero wrote: » Tinder has nothing to do with dating, it is a hook up app people looking for casual sex.
mzungu wrote: » Aye, there does seem to be a recurring theme in the thread of women only going for the 5% super hunks out there while the remaining 95% are consigned to live the single life. If this were true, there would be next to nobody hooking up, ever. Problem is that Tinder is being used as a metric to judge all relationships, and that is a hiding to nothing.
ongarboy wrote: » I have to dispute some of the entrenched opinions being spouted around here that seemed to be filled with resentment and bitterness. Some guys here seem to resent that girls have the upper hand in online dating but can any one of those guys say that if they were average looking yet had loads of women giving them attention, that they also wouldn't be selecting the cream of the crop and swiping left to any girl that wasn't 9/10 or more? I think it's hypocritical to condemn women for doing this when in fact men would do the exact same? I also have to dispute this notion that women only go for successful, alpha male rugby types. I have many good looking female friends, relatives and sisters and I've seen the attention they always got from guys whenever they were on nights out but I can't single out anyone of them that ended up or married this south side, fee paying school educated rugby player type that no one apart from this forum (and possibly the Sunday Independent) seems to put on a pedestal of male ideal. Any of the guys my friends hooked up with may in some cases be considered handsome or in decent jobs but it was their personalities that was their main selling point. Incidentally, none of them met their OHs through online dating so what does that say?
BabyE wrote: » Anyone have success off it, why do standards seem to be through the roof nowadays. You got to have the good facial looks, the immaculate hair, amazing body, height, charisma and all the trappings of high status and wealth and then maybe, just maybe you might snag yourself a ticket using the rebound card. What is it? Are we seeing a breathing out of the average male? Is a men only as good as his worse attribute to a women? So you might have a ripped well maintained body but by god if you are below 6 foot or that face isn't as symmetrical as it ought to be then you may as well sign out of the dating game.
The_Captain wrote: » Chris Pratt is a terrible example since he's still hot in his ugly stage. He went from hot to ridiculously good looking
Pat Mustard wrote: » Is that you Jay Cartwright?
Rakish Paddy wrote: » was knee-deep in clunge the entire time
