eviltwin wrote: » I think he looked better in the before photo
Zillah wrote: » Not really. Obviously you have to have genetic potential, but a lot of people will never know what their potential is.
siblers wrote: » I never had any trouble with Tinder, it helped improve my life for the better, found it easier to get dates off Tinder/POF than in real life.
Blacktie. wrote: » Pretty sure that wasn't his point.
Sleepy wrote: » If you think he struggled to get a date in the left picture, I'd say you're wrong. I'm not one to keep up with celebrity gossip etc but while he's undoubtedly in better shape these days, he's always been a decent looking bloke and seems to have bags of charm.
BabyE wrote: » LMAO you can't study bro, you are either born with that jawline and aesthetic facial features, that handsome face is the result of genetic combination, nothing more, nothing less.
leggo wrote: » I got to meet and interview Neil Strauss, the guy who wrote that book 'The Game', a few years ago after he did a talk/book signing here. He spoke about how, no matter what country or city he did such events in, guys said that girls in that particular area were broken and things were so much better elsewhere. The grass is always greener and all that...
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » It is not even a tinder, or dating site problem I think. It's an Ireland problem. Quite simply women from other countries don't tend to have such unrealistic expectations. There are an awful lot of Bondoran standard women in Ireland who don't want to settle for anything less than a Bondi standard man. Completely deluded.
Jimmy Garlic wrote: » I have been to a lot of countries and I know from experience that women in other countries do not have the same profoundly unrealistic expectations as Irish women.. They were basically throwing themselves at me when I was in Toronto and I'm no Fassbender lookalike. Irish women expect men to do all the work and are quite smug about rejecting all the men who show an interest who don't look like the male model that they think they deserve.
midnight city wrote: » You are right. Look at this link, click into the photos so you can scroll through them one at a time. Focus on the photo of them make up free, often you'll have to look at the made up photo to recognise them. That says a lot.
LLMMLL wrote: » Yeah but that extra that the OK looking guy is bringing is usually a good personality. And not in the sense that he's super charming. Lots of women have no interest in this guy. This PARTICULAR woman particularly liked his personality. It was two individuals that met and connected. Some of the posters on here would have you believe some part of her brain that is common across human females did a calculation unawares to her.
professore wrote: » Women have an arsenal of makeup, hair products etc they can use to hide their flaws and maximise their beauty. Men not so much.
Wibbs wrote: » There's some truth to that alright, though IMH and in my experience obvious disparities in looks are more the outliers and when they occur a bit of cursory digging usually turns up a balance in other areas. IE the guy if the less physically attractive he is bringing something else to the party. In the reverse case it's often something along the lines of the guy dropping the ball in other areas. EG one chap I knew years ago, good looking man, tall and athletic. He got lots of interest from women. Initially, but he had the conversational skills of a house brick, so few pursued beyond the short term and physical. All his long termers were best described, if unkindly, as plain. I can certainly say that in my experience down the years when for example guys have told me they're shocked and consider themselves very lucky as their girlfriend is "out of their league", I don't see much of a disparity going on. As I say in my experience, YMMV.