Trimm Trabb wrote: » Kane and Hazard in for Aguero and Coutinho. Aguero out is a wrench but allows me get Kane this week and Costa next week for their good runs of fixtures. Once Chelsea's run is over can get rid of Alonso and Costa and get Sergio back.
FHFC wrote: » I've quite a similar team and took a few hits lately to get it (-24 over 5 weeks). Karius/Pickford Brunt, Cedric, Holebas, Amat, Cameron Sanchez, Hazard, Firmino, Snodgrass, Capoo. Aguero, Kane, Austin. I'm tempted to go the same way and drop Sanchez to Theo, or Haz to Pedro to enable a bettee balanced midfield and fit in Siggy who I always wanted from GW15 and now cant afford due to Kane. Is Walcott gonna continue to be nailed I wonder? As if so I think sacrificing Sanchez, with a 'Winter Break' on the horizon, and enabling upgrading Snoddy and Holebas to Siggy and Alonso for example, would be worthwhile. I don't think Sanchez, Aguero, Kane and Haz in the same team is sustainable coming into Xmas. Anyone think different?
Mr.Prodston wrote: » Some Sunday night pondering has me thinking this for -4: Lukaku -> Kane Walcott -> Pedro Williams -> Cedric It leaves 0.0 in the bank though so would need to do it tonight and a week is a long time in FPL. Firminho yellow flagged is also a concern.
COH wrote: » Coutinho to: A - Walcott B - Pedro C - Alli Thoughts? Have Hazard, Firmino and Siggy already with Fletcher as bench fodder.
wanderer100 wrote: » Lukaku or Coutinho out? Only got the 1 FT
Fant11 wrote: » Need to make changes tonight due to price changes. Zaha, Allen or Moses for 4th mid next few weeks?
Mr.Prodston wrote: » Michael Dawson or Erik Pieters? Mid term defensive option. Or anyone under 4.5 that isn't Swansea or Watford or Evans? Dawson has potential goals while Pieters could have clean sheets.
iroced wrote: » BTW, why Alli gametime was managed in his last couple of games? Is he back from injury? Rotated because of EL?
FHFC wrote: » I don't think Sanchez, Aguero, Kane and Haz in the same team is sustainable coming into Xmas. Anyone think different?
Fant11 wrote: » Alli had a knee injury a few weeks back so has been managed back into the team which poch is notorious for doing. Kane looked close to back to his best already yest so would advise some Spurs coverage next few weeks for sure.
Ace2007 wrote: » don't see the love for Theo or Ali at all, Pedro I believe is value as long as he keeps his place. Son is better value than Ali
iroced wrote: » Alli has 3 great home fixtures in the next 4. Walcott is more a long term prospect. Pedro would double Chelsea away to City. I'm facing a similar conundrum to help out my missus. She just has Sanchez for your Firmino. With Firmino uncertainty, I'm thinking of a Spurs mid for those fixtures. Getting Kane sounds better but it'd require a £5.1m mid and she already has DeRoon. Now it's Alli, Eriksen or Son...
COH wrote: » All that's left to decide now is whether or not its worth a -4 to axe Williams for Cedric
iroced wrote: » So would you really favour Kane over Alli or any other Spurs mid even if it means -4 or -8? Have not seen Spurs playing for a while bar their non-game in Monaco...
Benimar wrote: » Thanks, I'm leaning the same way. I think Sanchez is more essential than Hazard. I like Defoe but need the transfer to Austin to fund the rest...unless I do Cech to Forster?
ballyargus wrote: » Coutinho in
shineon23 wrote: » Thinking Hazard and Coutinho out Sanchez and Pedro in Would like to get rid of Gundagen but I can't spend another day like day behind the couch fearing Sanchez.
greedygoblin wrote: » Considering the same move myself. It would be for a -4 also. 3 of the next 4 fixtures are away though...