lawlerp wrote: » Castleblakeney gone from Winter 2016/Spring 2017 to Early/Mid 2017.
lawlerp wrote: » openeir map now says "Estimated date for first Live Fibre Services is early/mid 2017" No mention of FTTH. How would I find out if this mean that FTTH is no more and instead it will be FTTC - which is no use to me as I'm too far away.
I would not be worried. It seems whoever updated the map has removed "FTTH" from a lot of the exchange descriptions. They all now say "first fibre" despite many of them already having live FTTC. It is another annoyance that there is no consistency in the description of updates. It seems different people make changes to the map.
scottyboi_2016 wrote: » Dunleer's gone from 'Winter 2016' to 'Winter 2016/17'
Johnboy1951 wrote: » That seems to be a reasonable correction as Winter spans late 2016 & early 2017.
Gonzo wrote: » Fiber rollout map has been updated. It doesn't surprise me that there is another run of delays including my own exchange. Dunshaughlin moved from Winter 2016 to Winter 2016/2017. Ratoath moved from Winter 2016 to early/mid 2017. Ashbourne moved from Winter/Spring to early/mid 2017. lots of exchanges delayed by at least 3 months. proof that getting another 36,000 live by end of 2016 was a pile of crap, don't believe anything you read in the papers.
Deleted User wrote: » OK we now have a date of early to mid 2017
Dr. Nick wrote: » Tara still Spring 2017, however what does the first sentence mean, those who already have some sort of b/band from the exchange will be upgraded?: TARA Estimated date for first Live Fibre Services is 23 November 2016. Estimated date for first Live FTTH Fibre Services is Spring 2017
Johnboy1951 wrote: » How about everyone being less selfish and wait until end Mar. 2017 and then get a count of how many of the 100,000 premises have been passed with eir FTTH? Naw, that would mean there would be no moaning and complaining about eir time-scale in the meantime
Nyum Nyum wrote: » When Eir want €50 p/m from me for a poor quality 3MB service (just broadband btw) yet houses three doors away from me are on a blue line, then I, for one, will be as selfish as I like, thanks.
legocrazy505 wrote: » To be honest seeing people moan over this rollout when we've been promised FTTC in the village for years, literally years, is just laughable. Be glad Eir are at least looking committed to starting improving some of our broadband connections. I await the NBP rollout now every day but we have to all remember the FTTH rollout will take time but once done it will finally fix the infrastructure for a long time to come.
Johnboy1951 wrote: » People need to realise that this particular thread is about a commercial roll out of FTTH by one company. As it is a commercial scheme that company will do whatever it decides is in ITS best interest. They will consider us and our opinions, ONLY, as customers ...... IF that commercial roll out reaches us. Those of us that are not due to avail of this commercial roll out are of little interest in this case. Those who are in the roll out area will just have to wait until the commercial decision determines when we receive the service. There are other threads about FTTH also ..... such as the SIRO thread and the NBP thread. The expectations of FTTH for all (NBP) should not be those for this commercial roll out. Neither should we expect to influence, in any material way, the commercial decisions behind this roll out.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » https://twitter.com/openeir/status/751323728491974656https://twitter.com/openeir/status/753852899461955585 This is what people are complaining about. Being misled by vastly over ambitious targets. Notice they say "will be able" not may or could be able. This is now not going to happen. Even last week we had the MD of Openeir lying about 35000 premises being passed by the end of the year. Why shouldn't people call them out on their misinformation?
long_b wrote: » Nothing to worry about folks, Gonzo will share his connection with us when he gets it next month, eh Gonzo?
Johnboy1951 wrote: » You have made two statements above ..... clear and definite. What facts can you produce to show the truth of your statements? You can see the future and know what will happen by the end of the year? *** Quite simply, most likely you as well most of us in this thread, have no real idea whether their predictions are possible/probable or not. None of us have access to the plans for the roll out nor the reasons for decisions made.When/IF they fail miserably to live up to their promises I will be one of those loudly berating them for their false promises to us all. Until then, while I can see them working on the roll out and I, like most everyone else, have no way to judge if they are on target or not, I will accept their promise on face value. Personally I expect the 100,000 date to slip, but I fully expect them to reach their 300,000 target on time.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » Fact 1: As of yesterday they have announced 2852 premises passed out of 106340 for a 2.68% completion rate of their original 100K announcement. Fact 2: Only two areas, Crosshaven and Inverin were given due dates for December, both the 14th for a possible maximum of 830 extra premises. Nowhere else has been given a due date this year. I don't think it is strange to extrapolate from this that they are not going to have 35000 premises passed by December 31st or with 128 days to go, including Christmas and New Years days, until March the 31st that it is highly unlikely that they will pass 103488 premises in that timeframe. I can only go on the data that has been released so far. You seem to be operating on blind faith.
Johnboy1951 wrote: » No, I am operating on the fact that the roll-out is not on a linear time frame regarding premises passed. The 'passing' of the premises with fibre is the last stage of meeting the 'premises passed' figure. It is also the least time-consuming when compared to the preparation needed for it to happen. Extrapolation of the time-frame Vs premises passed, as you appear to have done, does not take into account the non-linear aspect of the roll-out. That, and the fact that eir has a responsibility to its shareholders and is unlikely to deliberately lead them astray, indicates that eir is releasing information that is as accurate as it can be at the time of release.
Johnboy1951 wrote: » That, and the fact that eir has a responsibility to its shareholders and is unlikely to deliberately lead them astray, indicates that eir is releasing information that is as accurate as it can be at the time of release.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » You should offer your consulting services to Openeir as they seem not to have understood your "non-linear" theory when announcing their original deadline.
KOR101 wrote: » Eir have done nothing that would harm themselves so far. The harm would come from winning an area but losing the subsidy because they had already made connections available to some premises there. Doing preparatory work doesn't harm them at all provided they can commercially justify connecting the premises without a subsidy in preference to another company getting the connection. The preparation puts them in a good place to react to losing a particular area and also serves a warning to Government that they risk a legal case should Eir lose out.
Johnboy1951 wrote: » No, I am operating on the fact that the roll-out is not on a linear time frame regarding premises passed. That, and the fact that eir has a responsibility to its shareholders and is unlikely to deliberately lead them astray, indicates that eir is releasing information that is as accurate as it can be at the time of release.
superloopy wrote: » What's this new tack of people posting about moaning about people moaning? You do realize we are all in the same boat and that's the only reason we keep checking this thread? I think we are entitled to moan about FTTH on a thread specifically dealing with FTTH. My exchange doesn't have FTTC either. People are allowed comment about the FTTH rollout and lack of said rollout. People telling them to shut up because they have it worse!! Mental. Hit up. Eir is the problem. I was waiting for 20 years. Is that enough for a moan? My download speed is 3.50 down and 0.20 up. I can't get 4G. My 3G connection is patchy and congested. Eir gave me hope. Silly me for believing the hundreds of articles and tv ads. And me ignoring my history with Eircom.