A Little Pony wrote: » I am happy that Russia and the US will have a better relationship now and people said he would be the warmonger. Besides carrying the fight to ISIS, I doubt you will see the US invading any country or involved in more wars.
Akrasia wrote: » It's hard to know if you're serious or not.
lawlolawl wrote: » Mostly because reasonable people actually listened to his comments and realized that there isn't really anything racist about not wanting illegal immigrants and jihadists allowed into the country.
Donald Trump wrote: When Mexico sends it people, they're not sending their best. They're not sending you. They're sending people that have lots of problems, and they're bringing those problems with us. They're bringing drugs. They're bringing crime. They're rapists. And some, I assume, are good people,
Wibbs wrote: » Accelerate the process of imprisoning Americans? Ehh… You do realise that Americans make up something like 10% of people on the planet, yet Americans make up one quarter of all prisoners on the planet? Yep, 1 in 4 of all people in gaol on Earth is in an American gaol. If any nation on Earth could be called a "prison state", the US of A would be. And that's before we get to the well dodgy demographics of their prison population, never mind the private prisons making profits from free labour. Interestingly the first great US prison boom came in the south, in the wake of their civil war and freeing of the southern slaves and again the demographics were oddly skewed in favour of darker folks arrested on trumped up charges like loitering, vagrancy and being in charge of brown skin, curly hair and big lips in a built up area. So yeah, great idea, lock more of their citizens up. Jesus Christ.
Christy42 wrote: » No one has called white men idiots as far as I have seen. I am a white man and no one has called me an idiot. Trump is an out and out racist (I don't mean curbing immigration-calling Mexican's rapists and saying a judge was inappropriate because he was of Mexican heritage as a quick example). You have to wonder at the people supporting him. No one said all white men supported Trump so your claims of racism and sexism against white men is entirely unfounded. It seems Trump supporters want to receive respect without ever being respectful of others. Trump collapsed this campaign into the mud early on and his supporters cheered him for it. The minute someone points out his massive flaws they cry that they aren't respected enough. This thread shows the liberals have the tougher skin and are less likely to go for the pc police (I guess respect police for the right wing since they sub in respect for pc).
lawlolawl wrote: » Obama has deported more illegal immigrants than any other president in US history. Obama is such a horrible racist.
Guy:Incognito wrote: » You conveniently stop after saying he's going to round them up. His plan is to deport people that have no right to be in the country and send them back to their own country, not gas them. How many people were depored from America over the last 8 years?
McDermotX wrote: » Hope the Trump accelerates his plans for his massive prison gulags and chucks the whole lot of 'em in there.
Akrasia wrote: » When you have a candidate declaring that the very first thing he's going to do is round up millions of people including children, then it's a perfectly valid thing to compare them with Hitler or Stalin
learn_more wrote: » CNN are reporting anti-trump rallies in several cities. It's not being picked up on SKY or BBC. It's not like it's not happening, CNN are broadcasting live video of such.
Akrasia wrote: » When you have a candidate declaring that the very first thing he's going to do is round up millions of people including children, then it's a perfectly valid thing to compare them with Hitler or Stalin. Your embarrassment at seeing such comparisons is part of the reason why he was elected. Trump is a dangerous dangerous man. If he does even half of the things he campaigned on, then the world will be on fire when he leaves office
lawlolawl wrote: » I see the crybabies have blocked a freeway in California and injured cops in Oakland. Protesters reportedly goading and insulting police.
McDermotX wrote: » They're an absolute disgrace. Hope the Trump accelerates his plans for his massive prison gulags and chucks the whole lot of 'em in there.
DukeOfTheSharp wrote: » It also says a lot about Sanders supporters and Sanders himself. For all the bluster about change, he was really only a cult of personality candidate; once he was out, people lost interest, voted for Trump or voted for a third party candidate. Clinton got the crap end of the stick, was scrutinized unfairly, more than Trump was, and Sanders didn't rally his people behind her quick enough. The low voter turnout was awful for her too, and I think that in general it was the Sanders delusion that caused so much trouble. People don't care about policies, they care about the person, Sanders talked a big game, but never had any substance, Clinton did her homework and was qualified, but failed to reach her goal because of Sanders, electoral college and her gender. It's sad to say, but the idea of 'people power' only goes so far once you remove the personality in front of the ideology. It's the paradox of the political system, it's all flash, and any substance is lost to those blinded by it.
A Little Pony wrote: » How can that happen? You have a congress in America, checks and balances. Trump is NOT going to be Adolf Hitler or Joseph Stalin. The sooner people realize this the better. It was embarrassing seeing such comparisons during the campaign. It was as if people lived in an alternate universe and yet Trump battered her. The racist card didn't work.
tritium wrote: » Yeah respect is calling anyone who voted for the other side idiots, racists, xenophobes and in onea lovely case on here c*nts. Respect is demanding that the electoral system that was fine when it workes for your side be changed because the numbers dont work for you anymore. Respect is rioti g bwcause ypu didnt get the outcome you wanted Very respectful of the system that. Ive been clear enough in previous posts that im not a fan of either candidate. However the hypocricy of some clinton supporters post the elction is quite stunning. They spent half the campaign telling everyone how mean and bitter Trump voters were. Telling us how trump voters were racist and sexist. Now theyve lost the election w hat we get from is them a mean bitter whine about how those white men are all such idiots and c*nts and bigots to vote for Trump- pure racism and sexism that they cant even see as it sits in front of their faces. Because of course it was only redneck white sexist racists who voted for him. No one smart could have right? Rather than try to understand the wave of outrage that swept a candidate like Trump into the white house, a group who in many cases are experts on being outraged have decided they know best and theres really no issue to be looked at here. Its just the bottom feeders, nothing to see here, lets move on, democracy just didnt work! Bull**** to that, democracy actually worked as intended here and if no one in the DNC is prepared ro actually try to understand why they lost and the mistakes, miscalculations and ethically dumb moves they made then theyre likely to be facing the exact same problem in four years time
Arcade_Tryer wrote: » I wonder do they understand the difference between being respectful of the democratic system which provided the result, while simultaneously disagreeing vehemently with the result? Because you sure as hell don't seem to.
beach_walker wrote: » ...Did I say that? Yeah right on. Lemme guess you were totally on board with Iona complaining about the "homophobic" accusations on RTE and getting their pay-out. I mean they were totally entitled because of their taxes spent right? Giving a career platform to "celebs" such as (business man) Rory o'Neil on the basis of saying dumb things is wrong, right? Oh.
DukeOfTheSharp wrote: » It also says a lot about Sanders supporters and Sanders himself. For all the bluster about change, he was really only a cult of personality candidate; once he was out, people lost interest, voted for Trump or voted for a third party candidate. Clinton got the crap end of the stick, was scrutinized unfairly, more than Trump was, and The low voter turnout was awful for her too, and I think that in general it was the Sanders delusion that caused so much trouble.
People don't care about policies, they care about the person, Sanders talked a big game, but never had any substance, Clinton did her homework and was qualified, but failed to reach her goal because of Sanders, electoral college and her gender. It's sad to say, but the idea of 'people power' only goes so far once you remove the personality in front of the ideology. It's the paradox of the political system, it's all flash, and any substance is lost to those blinded by it.
A Little Pony wrote: » The racist card didn't work.
