endacl wrote: » Even the simplistic and wrong ones? :pac:
_Jamie_ wrote: » Gutted Trump won but an American girl I know posted numbers to suicide hotlines on her Facebook wall today in response to the election results. That is just daft and histrionic.
sabat wrote: » She has sex with him for money and no other reason. Why shouldn't I point out the truth?
midlandsmissus wrote: » How is that better or worse than Trump being with her for her looks, and for no other reason. Her looks were attractive to him. His money was attractive to her.
vetinari wrote: » It's quite valid to attack his supporters. It's the lack of challenging his supporters that's helped cause this. A lot of working class white men who are annoyed that the country is not as white as it used to be. They try to dress that up as nostalgia but it's clear what they mean. They don't expect Trump to bring back manufacturing jobs, no president can, they just want to feel like the white men are on top again.
anna080 wrote: » How did the opinion polls get it so wrong, again? Some are saying that a lot of those who publically endorsed Hillary were actually secret Trump voters.
jimmy blevins wrote: » While I'm no way a trump supporter I can't stand that attitude of intellectual superior complex to recent results.
anna080 wrote: » This is what people aged 18-25 said when casting their vote. Thank God they are the future.
sabat wrote: » Yes that's exactly what I said. She's a hoor; he's a john.
Iwasfrozen wrote: » Nothing wrong with calling idiots idiots.
Easy Rod wrote: » You don't understand why a source called 'Catholics for Trump' might not be approaching this subject in an objective manner? They have not provided facts just their (biased) (mis)interpretation. "But...but... he waved his arm around so he couldn't possibly be mocking him" is like saying he didn't mock someone in a wheelchair because he wasn't fully seated when he did the impression.
robindch wrote: » Unfortunately, idiots have exactly the same kind of votes which much smarter people have.
Galwayguy35 wrote: » The AAA aren't happy with the result it seems, well anything that pisses off Coppinger makes my evening.
suicide_circus wrote: » those opinions will change as they age
mansize wrote: » Ah the people-who-know-Betters We should really defer to them
lawlolawl wrote: » Classy.
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » The Polls got it wrong for Brexit and the GE in the UK back in 2015. Your second line, I think, gets to the nub of the issue. People are saying one thing, and voting the other way.
The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter." -
jmayo wrote: » Yep they are all racists.But could you please explain how Mid West rust belt states (Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Iowa) that actually backed a black man for president, twice even, are now racist because they backed Trump ? Feckin hell I guess you would say they are, you know, slow and thick :rolleyes: It took over 8 years to sink in that they were racists. They mustn't have noticed Obama was actually black when they voted for him twice :eek: If the only answer some people can find for why people voted for Trump is white man racism, then really it does reinforce how idiotic and myopic one side has become. I suppose it is the same answer as to why 20% of black people voted for him or 20% of Latinos voted for him. They must be racists like the 42% of women are sexist.