Widdershins wrote: » I love men 'TM' ?
Connacht2KXX wrote: » She said in a recent video that criticising women for being interested in makeup is misogynistic.
Advbrd wrote: » I am a white male who happens to be straight and who happens to be reasonably well off. Sorry for having a reasonably good life. Why do I get the feeling that the longer I live, the more I am going to have to apologise for being a "White Cisgender Privileged Male". I'm getting a bit sick of all this nonsense to be honest.
suicide_circus wrote: » stay off social media and watch this problem dusappear
Advbrd wrote: » It's creeping into real life.
Mortpourvelo wrote: » I was accused of displaying "white hetero privilege" - we were discussing the benefit cap in the UK. I asked "how do you know I'm white and straight ?" Came the answer "it was obvious, only white cis-genders agree with taking money from the poor". I'm still none the wiser tbh!!
jimgoose wrote: » People like Ms. O'Neill are quite privileged as well. That's why they have the time and resources to spend most of their time on social meeja crying over being impoverished one-legged Ethiopian lesbians, in spirit.
suicide_circus wrote: » a swift "f*ck off" should deal with that
lawlolawl wrote: » A certain event happened overnight that is going to change an awful lot in our discourse as a society
jimgoose wrote: » That's why they have the time and resources to spend most of their time on social meeja crying over being impoverished one-legged Ethiopian lesbians, in spirit.
pumpkin4life wrote: » Agreed. You're going to see more people talking openly about these topics and telling the more extreme parts to fùck off. I think Donald Trump's win has collectively risen the testosterone of a lot of Western Men
py2006 wrote: » https://twitter.com/oneilllo/status/796305438547574784
Advbrd wrote: » Yeah, that or something similar is the normal response. It just goes to reaffirm my privilege.
Widdershins wrote: » It just came out of the blue. She's vicious.
ligerdub wrote: » There seems to be a recurring trend with her actions where she goes out of her way to find criticism of her, and will respond in as vicious a way as possible. I dearly hope her profile diminishes as soon as possible. It's quite juvenile. Hi Louise!!
Connacht2KXX wrote: » I don't care what you say, you're opinion comes from patriarchal brainwashing you misogynistic, transphobic, homophobic, fatphobic, cis scum
jimgoose wrote: » Quote from Ms. O'Neill: "You are a real piece of shit. Good luck" in response to a ham-fisted but reasonably harmless criticism.
demfad wrote: » Harmless? Accusing LGBT people of alienating themselves from society and wanting attention for it is a pretty horrible thing to say in fairness. He is saying that being gay etc. is an act of self-alienation and not hiding in shame amounts to 'attention seeking'. If being themselves is alienating them from society then society needs to be more tolerant. Her comment was pretty fair. Note: the poster goes on to state his position represents 'real' Americans (white presumably) Absolutely nothing harmless about that man's world view.
midnight city wrote: » I'm glad the number of women voting for Trump was much higher than expected. It shows the likes of Louise that they aren't speaking for all women, or anywhere near it. Louise would have even voted for Myra Hindley over trump id imagine such is her hatred of men.
suicide_circus wrote: » oNeill has no right to criticise that man's life experience as a gay man. she's exhibiting some disgusting straight privilege.
demfad wrote: » The number of women voting for Trump was way lower than men voting for him even amongst his core supporters.
demfad wrote: » The number of women voting for Trump was way lower than men voting for him even amongst his core supporters. You don't have to hate men to vote against a misogynist who has boasted about sexually assaulting women and may face trial for similar: possibly even the rape of a thirteen year old minor.
ligerdub wrote: » What do you have to say to get censored around here?!
A federal judge in New York has ordered counsel for Donald Trump and the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein to appear in court along with the attorney for a woman referred to only as “Jane Doe” who alleges the Republican presidential nominee raped her when she was 13. Judge Ronnie Abrams has slated an initial status conference in the civil lawsuit for 16 December in a New York district court. (Jeffrey Epstein was already convicted of underage sex crimes in 2008 )
