Jan_de_Bakker wrote: » I think he means that they are assuming men will be a danger to women unless they take this class to teach them not to rape basically. I would worry what would happen to students that would refuse to take it - especially students doing serious courses (STEM) ... not all students go to college to toss of and do arts for 3 years...
maregal wrote: » Sorry that you feel that way mate but you're letting females control your emotions. Forget about them altogether and focus on self-improvement. Go to the gym and eat right to get into the best physical shape of your life. Work hard at your job, stash your cash and get that promotion. Read philosophy to understand the world and find inner peace. I suggest starting with the works of Stefan Molyneux for a dose of the red pill. I guarantee you'll feel happier and you'll learn to laugh at the betas bending over backwards to please an ungrateful female.
cantdecide wrote: » love, romance and the pursuit thereof gives me a shiver. Approaching women in bars and online is soul destroying to me.
orubiru wrote: » For me most of the MGTOW movement seems to be characterised by bitterness towards women and a lot of MGTOWs I've seen online are actual misogynists. There's seems to be a lot of "I am so sick of women and so sick of society favouring women and so scared I'll sleep with a lady and then be accused of rape so I am done". There's not a lot of "Meh, I've had enough so i'm just going to play games and watch football until I die. See ya!" It's less Men Going Their Own Way and more Men Who Rant About Hating Women. That's my view anyway. Maybe that's a common criticism of MGTOW though?
Kal El wrote: » Im not sure what this MGTOW is but it seems everything that goes against the norm towards women is viewed as guys being misogynists and hating women
mzungu wrote: » The short version: Lads annoyed at not being able to pick up women, so have decided to create a "philosophy" whereby they remove themselves from the dating sphere in order to reassert their masculinity. The long in-depth version: Lads annoyed at not being able to pick up women, so have decided to create a "philosophy" whereby they remove themselves from the dating sphere in order to reassert their masculinity.
FloatingVoter wrote: » That's the Japanese eejits.
The results of the survey, which was conducted in June of last year, say that 69 percent of male respondents and 59 percent of women respondents do not have an opposite-sex kōsai aite, a term that translates directly as “interaction partner.” And of these respondents in total, 30 percent say they have no “hope” for such a relationship. Moreover, 42 percent of both sexes remain virgins.
The author has argued that the concept of “female friend” has changed over time, which has contributed to the confusion. Thirty years ago, when the government's survey was conducted for the first time, men believed that all relationships with women were potentially sexual and this is no longer the case
maregal wrote: » Education system favours the female brain. Universities are packed with more females than males. SJW and politically correct dogma is shoved down your throat at these institutions.
BrianD3 wrote: » Funny that - when I search thejournal.ie for Female AND CEO I get 21000 hits. Whereas if I search for just CEO (a much less restrictive search) I get 32000 hits. I suspect that you have willfully misunderstood my point or simply don't understand what sort of result you will get if you search for the term CEO on a media website. There are more male CEOs than women CEOs. If you just search for CEO you'll get articles that mention CEOs in passing. Many of these CEOs will be men. Many will be women. This doesn't alter that fact that there are thousands of hits on the topic of employment/careers from various media organizations bemoaning that there aren't enough female CEOS or else glorifying those women that make CEO. Which was my point. Which is why you are the one talking nonsense.
Owryan wrote: » Really not sure what to make of the opening post. Robin Williams had depression before he got married. Women are just as much affected by the jobs situation. I routinely hold my kids hands in the park and on the town without being labeled a paedo. I ve also worked with vulnerable children without being accused of same. Society changes maybe that's the reason.
A_Sober_Paddy wrote: » https://www.google.ie/amp/www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/36322279?client=ms-android-motorolahttps://www.theguardian.com/books/2013/aug/18/will-self-reported-suspected-paedophile
Aurum wrote: Higher education was designed entirely by and for men. It’s only in the last century that women were allowed to attend universities, and only in the last 50-ish years that they did so in statistically significant numbers. According to the Irish Universities Association the gender balance between males and females attending undergraduate courses is 50:50, though there are more female postgrads. Also, in Irish universities, more males than females get firsts. Nothing here even hints at a systemic bias against men.
Wanderer78 wrote: » Our educational systems are designed to create 'worker drones' of both males and females, whereby participants follow orders, not question piers, listen and repeat, and do not encourage self development or awareness. they effectively are 'factories', whereby, 'one size' fits all, which has no resemblance on reality. They are examples of what I call 'hyper competitive' systems which are destructive for society as a whole
Owryan wrote: » 2 instances don't make an argument. I could post hundreds of random photos of men holding their child's hand without being labeled a paedo which the op suggested was a regular occurrence. Actually I ll be bringing my kids to the pool after, I ll prob see them naked, should I expect the gardai to swoop in and arrest me?
eviltwin wrote: MGTOW are a different breed however. They have to make a big deal of it. Their reasons tend to be a blanket judgment that all women are bitches who are out to get you. They are smug and seem to think they have a better insight than men in relationships. They seem unable to accept that some men can be happy and fulfilled in a relationship.
Mr Arrior wrote: » Blanket judgement right there if I ever saw one. Who says they are all like that. Do you know them all?
eviltwin wrote: » Anyone who has to publicly announce that they are avoiding women like anyone cares and who subscribes to this red pill rubbish is a bit of an idiot. You'd do well to avoid that kind of nonsense.
Colser wrote: » And they are so vocal about it that I actually don't believe a word of it...he who protests too much etc.
Thelomen Toblackai wrote: There's plenty of vocal assholes with chips on their shoulder in every group\organisation\movement\advocates of a concept etc. Doesn't mean we should go labeling everyone or defining everything based on the comments of a few.
Colser wrote: » True I suppose..I still think they'd take the ride if they got it though..just my opinion anyway.
Thelomen Toblackai wrote: » That's the problem though, you only hear the ones who go on about it. And those who are inclined to go on about it are the ones with the chips on their shoulders and want to get attention. Meanwhile there's probably a lot of people who identify with the concept, live the way they do because it's just the life they fell into and are comfortable with. But then people make blanket statements about something labeling everyone who's related to is as women haters or pathetic saddos who can't get laid. There's plenty of vocal assholes with chips on their shoulder in every group\organisation\movement\advocates of a concept etc. Doesn't mean we should go labeling everyone or defining everything based on the comments of a few.
