Dawggone wrote: » Firstly, I totally agree about the ability of dairy farmers to moan, and yes the French dairy farmers would have to be world champions at it. Secondly, I just can't agree on the line about there being only 4 million people to consume the Irish dairy product. Local can become global quite easily, especially when you have the provenance that the Irish family farm has. Think Irish whiskey...started local, now global. I don't think that the consumer is demanding more milk powder, or maybe I'm wrong? The consumer is now turning into the prosumer...the prosumer will want to watch live feed of the cows in the sheds/fields/ milking parlor at any time they want. The dairy industry that latches onto the eco/soil/animal friendly brand will steal a march on the competition. I know that ye think I'm crazy, but I'll bet that the industry that opens its doors via live feed 24/7, will open the purse of the end user. This idea is already being floated by processors here. My crowd make baby formula for the Chinese market and they are actively looking for farmers to participate... Mahoney's right. Fighting over scraps every time of a little crisis is not a good plan going forward. Big market out there. Aim for the top end consumer....or just moan.
Keepgrowing wrote: » Take hi end elements and market it, dry and bag what's left and get off the island ASAP. With seasonal production that's the reality.
Buford T. Justice V wrote: Apparently, we have to wait for the area manager to fill out the form with us.
yosemitesam1 wrote: Saw iberian ham for sale today in the supermarket 85/kg...
freedominacup wrote: » Well he's a fair genius mj. The literature is ambiguous at best. You have to apply twice. Once to join the scheme and a second time for payment. Yourself and injuryprone would really want to get down off yerselves. Neither of you have provided a link to anything that confirms your posts.
kowtow wrote: » I think I'm beginning to understand the election results in Kerry.
Keepgrowing wrote: » whiskey, grain guys doing fair well out of that. Take hi end elements and market it, dry and bag what's left and get off the island ASAP. With seasonal production that's the reality.
kowtow wrote: » Jamberico mmmmmmm
Dawggone wrote: » You've been misinformed on the malt growers margins...grossly. Milk at present prices is a much better earner. Seasonal production was a major bugbear of the milk industry before the Kiwi magic formula of milk powder manufacturing. The Kiwis now openly admit to the mistake of following that line...
Dawggone wrote: » Keepgrowing wrote: » whiskey, grain guys doing fair well out of that. Take hi end elements and market it, dry and bag what's left and get off the island ASAP. With seasonal production that's the reality. You've been misinformed on the malt growers margins...grossly. Milk at present prices is a much better earner. Seasonal production was a major bugbear of the milk industry before the Kiwi magic formula of milk powder manufacturing. The Kiwis now openly admit to the mistake of following that line...
Keepgrowing wrote: » You post of whiskey being the great international market success, I mention how well (NOT) grain farmers are doing and you then repeat what we already know.
Keepgrowing wrote: » I can only assume you're deliberately missing the point??? You post of whiskey being the great international market success, I mention how well (NOT) grain farmers are doing and you then repeat what we already know. Try to keep a line of thought. You still haven't addressed Shyte caked?? Actually it's ok, don't bother
Injuryprone wrote: » Every detail I've posted is in the following dafm document. I had thought everyone would've got a copy of it in the posthttps://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/farmingsectors/dairy/voluntarysupplymanagementschemeforthedairysector/VOLUNTARY%20SUPPLY%20MANAGEMENT%20SCHEME%20FAQ.pdf
freedominacup wrote: » The only negative thread I've seen on kerrygold was centred on the fact that our cows are getting in fw terms a tiny fraction of their diet from gm sources. If we were looking at a usp for our farm produce it should be that we move to gm free. I used to think it was too difficult logistically but now I think it would be worth it. We would take a performance hit but not that huge a one. We should be emphasizing using native grains with as much synergy as possible between livestock and tillage sectors. A real all island approach.
Dawggone wrote: » freedominacup wrote: » The only negative thread I've seen on kerrygold was centred on the fact that our cows are getting in fw terms a tiny fraction of their diet from gm sources. If we were looking at a usp for our farm produce it should be that we move to gm free. I used to think it was too difficult logistically but now I think it would be worth it. We would take a performance hit but not that huge a one. We should be emphasizing using native grains with as much synergy as possible between livestock and tillage sectors. A real all island approach. +1. Bang on. I would add that there are also other issues that need to be addressed. The overuse of chemical fert, carbon sequestration, biodiversity etc etc. The majority of the Irish green image is already in the head of the rich consumer...should be easy enough to take it into the 21st century.
Mooooo wrote: » Chemical fertiliser overuse would imply water quality issues, AFAIK I don't think that is a major issue here.
Dawggone wrote: » +1. Bang on. I would add that there are also other issues that need to be addressed. The overuse of chemical fert, carbon sequestration, biodiversity etc etc. The majority of the Irish green image is already in the head of the rich consumer...should be easy enough to take it into the 21st century.
freedominacup wrote: » The chemical fert usage overall here is tiny dawg. Across the industry we'd easily be under French limits. Definitely not individually but our national usage is a lot lower than you think. 50-60 units would be the outside of it.
Dawggone wrote: » Iberico ham (sorry!)has on farm inspections regularly...a full inventory of fert/pesticide/medicine usage etc. Lamping underused mountainy land into your fert usage land base isn't going to fool an educated consumer. See I'm not saying that Ireland should/must go down this road...I'm just suggesting another route. I'm probably one of the oldest posters here, the younger posters should be much more ambitious and forward seeing, not towing the Ag industry line...there must be another Dr. Tony O Reilly out there. I wouldn't be depending on the Gov. Teagasc or the processors for guidance.
freedominacup wrote: » I didn't. There's more than enough underused lowland. The full inventory stuff wouldn't be any stretch here at this stage. Getting the correct results could be another thing.
freedominacup wrote: The chemical fert usage overall here is tiny dawg. Across the industry we'd easily be under French limits. Definitely not individually but our national usage is a lot lower than you think. 50-60 units would be the outside of it.
Waffletraktor wrote: » World stock are record highs for feed grains, you need to highest quality as thats what everyone else is aiming for unless its RR Corn. Quality is hard in ireland, though if you can get beans to yield with less pests about in ireland Beans for h/c puts everything in a hapenny place net margin wise.
kevthegaff wrote: » I thought we were one of highest in EU maybe I'm wrong
Keepgrowing wrote: » Shyte caked cows
RightTurnClyde wrote: » Tail docking.... Tut tut