plodder wrote: » What about the text when you hover over it? That would be more important imo.
grouchyman wrote: » Castleblakeney in Galway gone back to blue from green as well. The timeline is still winter/spring 2016/2017.
digiman wrote: » That's a GPON card being installed into what looks like an existing FTTC node. That is handy to already have the chassis installed, saves some time in their rollout.
Rattlehead_ie wrote: » The most hilarious thing about that is the anti-static wrist strap....Brilliant
Hank Scorpio wrote: » My exchange according to the latest map got vectored, but there's no change in the attainable's on my router. Another cabinet also got enabled and is live but according to the digiweb database, and all the previous numbers I tried surrounding that cabinet, there is also no difference in the attainable's for those houses. What gives!
yfaykya wrote: » What map shows when vectoring is enabled?
yqtwqxqm wrote: » If im on one of those blue lines on the map what can I expect? I currently have eFibre at 20 megs How do I find out if i have vectoring on?
Hank Scorpio wrote: » @ED_E Couple of days ago I think but I can't be sure. The map previously showed the exchange at 70MB/s but now it shows 100Mb/s. I seen a Eir Van working at the exchange on Tuesday.
yqtwqxqm wrote: » My exchange says "Estimated date for first Live FTTH Fibre Services with speeds up to 1000Mb/s is Winter 2016/ Spring 2017". Can that be believed?
Hank Scorpio wrote: » I'd assume it's correct, not many areas have a timeline yet for the install. FTTH is different technology to what you have currently so you won't be limited by your landline.
yqtwqxqm wrote: » Sounds great. Am I guaranteed getting it if i am on a blue line? And when they say houses will start getting it, is it possible , like with efibre that it could be years after the first person gets it that everyone else can
ED E wrote: » Hank, you said non of the houses attainables have changed, but I think you mean prequals haven't changed right? Check the line stats, they'll instantly improve when vectoring is enabled. Mainly you'll see your SNR climb significantly.
Hank Scorpio wrote: On my own router the SNR stats appear to be the same, as are the max attainable rates. I'm on the 40/10 profile, router says max DL is 56 and max UL is 17 which has always been the case.
rob808 wrote: » If your house in Amber on NBP map and your house on blue line you get FTTH.
yqtwqxqm wrote: » My house is in a blue circle about 500 meters wide surrounded by amber. Its on the blue line. I guess im out of luck then. There is a wireless provider here, well known for being unusable, so no chance of getting decent service off them and definitely not FTTH speeds.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » Rob is not correct I believe. This initial rollout by openeir is separate to the NBP so blue areas may not come into it. If you are on a blue line you should be able to order it when it rolls out.
rob808 wrote: » I was just point out if your house in Amber which is houses eir targeting for there rural FTTH because there still part of NBP.There concetrating on bring FTTH to areas that don't have FTTC access if your getting under 30mb you get FTTH.The new add houses in FTTC areas for NBP aren't in included rural rollout unless eir make some statement about it and takes some of the rural houses out of there rollout.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » Have you any official statement from Openeir that premises in rural exchange areas that may now have a FTTC service will be prevented from ordering a FTTH service even though a cable may be passing their driveway? If you have no statement from Openeir can you clarify why you are making such claims?
rob808 wrote: » There Notting to say they wouldn't more than likely people living in FTTC areas will get upgrade to FTTH at some stage but not with rural rollout unless there getting under 30mb.The good thing about FIbre going through a town or village at a later stage they would be able to upgrade them to FTTH.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » You keep repeating this as fact despite having no basis for doing so. Please stop posting misinformation. It is helping nobody.
Johnboy1951 wrote: » Do we know it is misinformation?